Religious Studies


symposium on Divine Discourse
Reply

Response to Helm, Quinn, and Westphal


NICHOLAS  WOLTERSTORFF  a1
a1 Yale University Divinity School, 409 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT 06511

Abstract

Before beginning my response, let me express the honour I feel in having these three friends and distinguished philosophical colleagues comment so thoughtfully on my ideas in Divine Discourse. I warmly thank them for their ‘labours’.

I propose mirroring the general structure of the book itself in my response. First, I'll consider what Helm says about my delineation of the topic, second, what Quinn says about my discussion of God speaking; third, what Westphal says about my discussion of interpreting for God's speech; and last, what Quinn says about my discussion of the epistemology of believing that God speaks.