Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T17:25:07.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Licensing by modification: The case of French de nominals1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2012

ÉRIC MATHIEU
ÉRIC MATHIEU*
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa
*
Author's address: Department of Linguistics, University of Ottawa, 70 Laurier Avenue East, Ottawa, K1N6N5, Canadaemathieu@uottawa.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to provide an analysis of the positive effect that modification has on the distribution of noun phrases in otherwise illicit environments. I focus on de nominals in French. By focusing on these nominals, whose distribution is altered by the addition of modifiers, the paper shows that modifiers can do much more than simply modify: they can change the syntactic and semantic status of a noun phrase. The licensing property of modifiers is an intriguing topic and has not been greatly discussed in the literature. I argue that modifiers can come to play the role of determiners in French as long as they are accompanied by a head de, which is the spell-out of a Cardinal head (see Lyons 1999). My proposal goes back to an old idea put forward by Damourette & Pichon (1911–1940) according to which, in modified contexts, de functions as one half of the article while the adjective functions as the other half. More generally, articles in French are seen as dual entities comprising of a specifier and a head. In the absence of the determiner les, an adjective can raise to the specifier of CardinalP. This is achieved via phrasal rather than head movement.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , July 2012 , pp. 389 - 426
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[1]

I wish to thank two anonymous JL referees for very helpful comments. Funding from SSHRC (Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada) is gratefully acknowledged (#410-2005-1781 awarded to Éric Mathieu).

References

REFERENCES

Abeillé, Anne & Godard, Danièle. 1999. La position de l'adjectif épithète en français: le poids des mots. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 28, 9–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Haegeman, Liliane & Stavrou, Melita. 2007. Noun phrase in the generative perspective. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. 1992. A-Morphous morphology. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Androutsopoulou, Antonia. 2000. On the (in)ability of pre-nominal attributive adjectives to take complements. WCCFL (West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics) 19, 29–42. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Androutsopoulou, Antonia & Echevarría, Manuel Español. 2003. D-raising and Asymmetric Agreement in French. In Griffin, William E. (ed.), The role of agreement in natural language: TLS 5 Proceedings (Texas Linguistics Forum 53), 35–40.Google Scholar
Anscombre, Jean-Claude. 1996. Partitif et localisation temporelle. Langue française 109, 80–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark C. 1988. Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Judy B. 1993. Topics in the syntax of nominal structure across Romance. Ph.D. dissertation, City University of New York.Google Scholar
Blinkenberg, Andreas. 1933. L'ordre des mots en français moderne: deuxième partie. Copenhagen: Levin & Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2005. In name only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bouchard, Denis. 1998. The distribution and interpretation of adjectives in French: A consequence of Bare Phrase Structure. Probus 10, 139–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, Denis. 2002. Adjectives, number and interfaces. Oxford: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brugè, Laura. 2002. The positions of demonstratives in the extended nominal projection. In Cinque, (ed.), 15–53.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998. Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6, 339–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Martin, Roger, Michaels, David & Uriagereka, Juan (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Kenstowicz, Michael (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1993. On the evidence for partial N-movement in the Romance DP. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 3, 21–40.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1994. On the evidence for partial N-movement in the Romance DP. In Cinque, Guglielmo, Koster, Jan, Pollock, Jean-Yves, Rizzi, Luigi & Zanuttini, Raffaella (eds.), Paths towards Universal Grammar: Studies in honor of Richard S.Kayne (Georgetown Studies in Romance Linguistics), 85–110. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A crosslinguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo (ed.). 2002. Functional structure in DP and IP: The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 1, 54–90. Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clédat, Léon. 1901. La préposition et l'article partitif. Revue de philologie française et de literature 15, 81–131.Google Scholar
Contreras, Heles. 1986. Spanish Bare NPs and the ECP. In Bordelois, Ivonne, Contreras, Heles & Zagona, Karen (eds.), Generative studies in Spanish syntax, 25–49. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Curat, Hervé. 1999. Les déterminants dans la référence nominale et les conditions de leur absence. Genève: Librairie Droz.Google Scholar
Damourette, Jacques & Pichon, Édouard. 1911–1940. Des mots à la pensée: essai de Grammaire de la langue française, 7 vols. Paris: D'Artrey.Google Scholar
Dayal, Veneeta. 1995. Licensing any in non-negative/non-modal contexts. In Simons, Mandy & Galloway, Teresa (eds.), SALT (Semantics and Linguistic Theory) V, 54–71.Google Scholar
Dayal, Veneeta. 1998. Any as inherently modal. Linguistics & Philosophy 21, 433–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dayal, Veneeta. 2004. Licensing by modification. Ilha do Desterro Florianópolis 47, 217–238.Google Scholar
Déchaine, Rose-Marie. 1993. Predicates across categories: Towards a category-neutral syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Delfitto, Denis & Schroten, Jan. 1991. Bare plurals and the number affix in DP. Probus 3, 155–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demonte, Violeta. 1999. A minimal account of Spanish adjective position and interpretation. In Franco, Jon A., Landa, Alazne & Martin, Juan (eds.), Analyses in Basque and Romance linguistics, 45–76. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dimitrova-Vulchanova, Mila & Giusti, Giuliana. 1998. Fragments of Balkan nominal structure. In Alexiadou, Artemis & Wilder, Chris (eds.), Possessors, predicates and movement in the determiner phrase, 333–361. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen & Laca, Brenda. 2003. Les noms sans déterminant dans les langues romanes. In Godard, Danièle (ed.), Les langues romanes – Problèmes de la phrase simple, 235–281. Paris: Éditions du CNRS.Google Scholar
Frei, Henri. 1960. Tranches homophones: à propos de l'article partitif. Word 3, 317–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galmiche, Michel. 1986a. Référence indefinite, événements, proprétés et pertinence. In David, Jean & Kleiber, Georges (eds.), Déterminants: syntaxe et sémantique, 41–71. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Galmiche, Michel. 1986b. Notes sur les noms de masse et le partitif. Langue française 72, 40–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giusti, Giuliana. 1997. The categorial status of determiners. In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.), The new comparative syntax, 95–124. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Giusti, Giuliana. 2002. The functional structure of noun phrases: A bare phrase structure approach. In Cinque, (ed.), 54–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1978. How does a language acquire gender markers. In Greenberg, Joseph H., Ferguson, Charles A. & Moravcsik, Edith A. (eds.), Universals of human language, vol. 3, 47–82. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Gross, Maurice. 1967. Sur une règle de cacophonie. Langages 7, 105–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1995. Diachronic sources of ‘all’ and ‘every’. In Bach, Emmon, Jelinek, Eloise, Kratzer, Angelika & Partee, Barbara H. (eds.), Quantification in natural languages, 363–382. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Heyd, Sophie. 2003. L'interprétation des syntagmes nominaux en ‘des’ et ‘de’ en position sujet et objet – généricité, habitualité et incorporation sémantique. Ph.D. dissertation, Université de Strasbourg 2.Google Scholar
Heyd, Sophie & Mathieu, Éric. 2005. The semantics of [de N] structures, incorporation and referential intentions. Presented at Indefinites and Weak Quantifiers, Marie Haps Institute and the Royal Flemish Academy for Sciences and Arts, Brussels, 6–8 January.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus. 2001. Articles. In Haspelmath, Martin, König, Ekkehard, Oesterreicher, Wulf & Raible, Wolfgang (eds.), Language typology and language universals: An international handbook, vol. 1, 831–841. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 2000. Scandinavian stylistic fronting: How any category can become expletive. Linguistic Inquiry 31, 445–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Philip & Hinchliffe, Ian. 1994. Swedish: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jones, Michael Allan. 1996. Foundations of French syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamp, Hans & Ryle, Uwe. 1993. From discourse to logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 1975. French syntax: The transformational cycle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 1984. Connectedness and binary branching. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Klavans, Judith. 1985. The independence of syntax and phonology in cliticization. Language 61, 95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knittel, Marie Laurence. 2005. Some remarks on adjective placement in the French NP. Probus 17, 185–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupferman, Lucien. 2004. Le mot de: domains prépositionnels et domaines quantificationnels. Bruxuelles: de Boeck.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laenzlinger, Christopher. 2005. French adjective ordering: Perspectives on DP-internal movement types. Lingua 115, 645–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamarche, Jacques. 1991. Problems for N-movement to NumP. Probus 3, 215–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, Idan. 2007. EPP Extensions. Linguistic Inquiry 5, 485–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legendre, Géraldine. 2000. Positioning Romanian verbal clitics at PF: An Optimality-theoretic analysis. In Gerlach, Birgit & Grijzenhout, Janet (eds.), Clitics in phonology, morphology, and syntax, 219–254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Legrand, Jean. 1975. Or and any:The syntax and semantics of two logical operators. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle. 1992. Deconstructing morphology: Word formation in syntactic theory. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1994. Reference and proper names: A theory of N-movement in syntax and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 25, 609–665.Google Scholar
Lyons, Christopher. 1999. Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathieu, Éric. 2004. The mapping of form and interpretation: The case of optional WH movement in French. Lingua 114, 1090–1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, Jean-Claude. 1978. De la syntaxe à l'interprétation: Quantités, insultes, exclamations. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Panagiotidis, Phoevos. 2000. Demonstrative determiners and operators: The case of Greek. Lingua 110, 717–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 1997. Quantifier scope: How labor is divided between QR and Choice Functions. Linguistics and Philosophy 20, 335–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.), Elements of grammar: Handbook in generative syntax, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadler, Louisa & Arnold, Douglas. 1994. Pre-nominal adjectives and the phrasal/lexical distinction. Journal of Linguistics 30, 187–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shlonsky, Ur. 2004. The form of the Semitic noun phrase. Lingua 114, 1465–1526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spector, Benjamin. 2003. Plural indefinite DPs as plural-polarity items. In Quer, Josep, Schroten, Jan, Scorretti, Mauro, Sleeman, Petra & Verheugd, Els (eds.), Romance languages & linguistic theory 2001, 295–313. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Andrew. 2000. Verbal clitics in Bulgarian: A Paradigm–Function approach. In Gerlach, Birgit & Grijzenhout, Janet (eds.), Clitics in phonology, morphology and syntax, 355–386. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Starke, Michal. 2001. Move dissolves into Merge: A theory of locality. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Geneva.Google Scholar
Stowell, Tim. 1981. Origins of phrase structure. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Valois, Daniel. 1991a. The internal syntax of DP and adjective placement in French and English. NELS (North East Linguistic Society) 21, 367–382.Google Scholar
Valois, Daniel. 1991b. The syntax of DP. Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Vogeeler, Svetlana & Tasmowski, Liliane. 2005. Les N, un N et des N en lecture générique. In Vogeleer, Svetlana & Tasmowski, Liliane (eds.), Déterminants indéfinis en français. Travaux de linguistique 50, 53–78.Google Scholar
Vogeeler, Svetlana & Liliane, Tasmowski. 2006. Introduction. In Vogeleer, Svetlana & Tasmowski, Liliane (eds.), Non-definiteness and plurality, 1–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Robert Léon & Jacqueline, Pinchon. 1962. Grammaire du français classique et moderne. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Wilmet, Marc. 1986. La détermination nominale. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Wolter, Lynsey. 2007. Situation variables and licensing by modification in opaque demonstratives. In Puig-Waldmüller, Estela (ed.), Sinn und Bedeutung 11, 612–626. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. 1977. On clitics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar