Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T20:02:30.750Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Robert Pinker, the Idea of Welfare and the Study of Social Policy: On Unitarism and Pluralism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2012

JOHN OFFER
JOHN OFFER*
Affiliation:
Professor of Social Theory and Policy, School of Criminology, Politics and Social Policy, University of Ulster, Coleraine, N. Ireland, BT52 1SA email: j.offer@ulster.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article reappraises the distinction upon which Robert Pinker has insisted since the 1970s between the heuristic and the normative dimensions of concepts and theories associated with ‘welfare’ in social policy studies, a distinction prompted by, for instance, the writings of Richard Titmuss. It discusses Pinker's differentiation of forms of study which seek to account for the likenesses and unlikenesses within and between the welfare systems of different countries from forms of study aiming to establish moral criteria by which one system of welfare can be deemed superior to another. In particular, it highlights his emphasis on the need for social policy as a subject to attend to: (a) the reality of everyday ideas of social welfare and ‘faring well’ in general; (b) how everyday ideas of ‘faring well’ are exhibited in what he has called ‘conditional altruism’, whether exercised within families, towards strangers or across nations; (c) the practices undertaken by individuals and families to attain freedom and security as well as to meet those of their needs commonly taken within social policy studies to be the components of ‘welfare’; (d) the difficulties, moral, political, social and economic, associated with Titmussian welfare unitarism, in contrast to welfare pluralism. The article thus provides a review of aspects of Pinker's many published papers as well as his influential Social Theory and Social Policy and The Idea of Welfare.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , July 2012 , pp. 615 - 634
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allan, G. (1983), ‘Informal networks of care: issues raised by Barclay’, British Journal of Social Work, 13: 417–33.Google Scholar
Barclay Report (1982), Social Workers: Their Role and Tasks, London: Bedford Square Press.Google Scholar
Berger, P. and Luckmann, T. (1966), The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Garden City, New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Brewer, C. and Lait, J. (1980), Can Social Work Survive? London: Temple Smith.Google Scholar
Bulmer, M. (1986), Neighbours: The Work of Philip Abrams, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carrier, J. and Kendall, I. (1973), ‘Social policy and social change: explanations of the development of social policy’, Journal of Social Policy, 2: 3, 209–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrier, J. and Kendall, I. (1977), ‘The development of welfare states: the production of plausible accounts’, Journal of Social Policy, 6: 3, 271–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cecil, R., Offer, J. and St Leger, F. (1987), Informal Welfare, Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
Collins, A. H. and Pancoast, D. L. (1976), Natural Helping Networks, Washington: National Association of Social Workers.Google Scholar
Daly, M. (2011), Welfare, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Deacon, A. and Mann, K. (1999), ‘Agency, modernity and social policy’, Journal of Social Policy, 28: 3, 413–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deacon, R., Lipton, N. and Pinker, R. (2010), Privacy and Personality Rights: Commercial Exploitation and Protection, Bristol: Jordans.Google Scholar
Dean, H. (2010), Understanding Human Need, Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dingwall, R. (1976), Aspects of Illness, London: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
Douglas, J. (ed.), Deviance and Respectability: The Social Construction of Moral Meaning, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Finlayson, G. (1994), Citizen, State and Social Welfare in Britain 1830–1990, Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froland, C., Pancoast, D. L., Chapman, D. J. and Kimboko, P. J. (1981), ‘Linking formal and informal support systems’, in Gottlieb, B. (ed.), Social Networks and Social Support, Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Green, D. (1993), Reinventing Civil Society: The Rediscovery of Welfare without Politics, London: Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
Griffiths Report (1988), Community Care: Agenda for Action. A Report to the Secretary of State for Social Services by Sir Roy Griffiths, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Harris, J. (2002), ‘From poor law to welfare state? A European Perspective’, in Winch, D. and O'Brien, P. K. (eds.), The Political Economy of British Historical Experience 1688–1914, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 409–38.Google Scholar
Hewison, R. (1995), Culture and Consensus, London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Ignatieff, M. (1984), The Needs of Strangers, London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
Johnson, J., Rolph, S. and Smith, R. (2010), Residential Care Transformed: Revisiting ‘The Last Refuge’, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, P. (1972), ‘Review, Robert Pinker, Social Theory and Social Policy’, Journal of Social Policy, 1: 1, 91–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leventhal, F. M. (1990), ‘“The best for the most”: CEMA and state sponsorship of the arts in wartime, 1939–1945’, Twentieth Century British History, 1: 3, 289–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Low, E. (2000), ‘Class and the conceptualization of citizenship in twentieth-century Britain’, History of Political Thought, 21: 1, 114–31.Google Scholar
Mann, K. (2009) ‘Remembering and rethinking the social divisions of welfare 50 years on’, Journal of Social Policy, 38: 1, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcuse, H. (1964), One-Dimensional Man, Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Marshall, T. H. (1972), ‘Value problems of welfare-capitalism’, Journal of Social Policy, 1: 1, 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, K. (1963), Karl Marx: Selected Writings in Sociology and Social Philosophy, edited by Bottomore, T. B. and Rubel, M., Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Offer, J. (1999), ‘Idealist thought, social policy and the rediscovery of informal care’, British Journal of Sociology, 50: 3, 467–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Offer, J. (2006), ‘“Virtue”, “citizen character” and “social environment”: social theory and agency in social policy since 1830’, Journal of Social Policy, 35: 2, 283–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, G. (1990), With Due Care and Attention, London: Family Studies Policy Centre.Google Scholar
Parker, R. A. (1974), ‘Social administration in search of generality’, New Society, 6 June, 566–8.Google Scholar
Pinker, R. A. (1966), English Hospital Statistics, 1861–1938, London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Pinker, R. A. (1971), Social Theory and Social Policy, London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Pinker, R. A. (1973), The Welfare State: A Comparative Perspective, London: Bookstall Publications.Google Scholar
Pinker, R. A. (1974), ‘Social policy and social justice’, Journal of Social Policy, 3: 1, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, R. A. (1979), The Idea of Welfare, London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Pinker, R. A. (1981), ‘The contribution of T. H. Marshall’, in The Right to Welfare and Other Essays, by T. H. Marshall, London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Pinker, R. A. (1982a), ‘Theory and ideology in social welfare’, SWRC Reports and Proceedings, 26, Social Welfare Research Centre: University of New South Wales.Google Scholar
Pinker, R. A. (1982b), ‘An alternative view’, Appendix B in the Barclay Report (1982), pp. 236–62.Google Scholar
Pinker, R. A. (1984), ‘Populism and the social services’, Social Policy and Administration, 18: 1, 89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, R. A. (1985), ‘Social policy and social care: divisions of responsibility’, in Yoder, J. A., Jonker, J. M. L. and Leaper, R. A. B. (eds.), Support Networks in a Caring Community, Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 103–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, R. A. (1986), ‘Social welfare in Japan and Britain: A Comparative view’, in Øyen, E. (ed.), Comparing Welfare States and Their Futures, Aldershot: Gower, pp. 114–28.Google Scholar
Pinker, R. A. (1990), Social Work in an Enterprise Society, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pinker, R. A. (1992), ‘Making sense of the mixed economy of welfare’, Social Policy and Administration, 26: 4, 273–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, R. A. (1995a), ‘The place of freedom in the concept of welfare’, in Barker, E. (ed.), Freedom, London: University College Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, R. A. (1995b), ‘Golden ages and welfare alchemists’, Social Policy and Administration, 29: 2, 78–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, R. A. (2000), Review of J. T. Godbout in collaboration with A. Caille, The World of the Gift, 1998, in Journal of Social Policy, 29: 1, 150–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, R. A. (2004, unpublished), ‘The idea of welfare in a globalized world’, paper presented at the conference ‘Globalization of the Welfare State?’, Hanse Institute for Advanced Study, Delmenhorst, Germany, 6–8 February 2004.Google Scholar
Pinker, R. A. (2006a), ‘From gift relationships to quasi-markets: an odyssey along the policy paths of altruism and egoism’, Social Policy and Administration, 40: 1, 10–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, R. A. (2006b), ‘Citizenship, civil war and welfare: the making of modern Ireland’, 21st Century Society, 1: 1, 23–38.Google Scholar
Pinker, R. A. (2008), ‘Richard Titmuss and the making of British social policy studies’, Sosiologisk tidsskrift (Journal of Sociology), 16: 2, 167–84, Oslo: Universitets Forlaget.Google Scholar
Pinker, R. A. (2011), ‘Social inequality, poverty and social redistribution’, Journal of the National Centre for Social Research (Athens), Special Issue on Contemporary Social Inequalities, Psimmenos, I. (ed.), 13: 136, 9–23.Google Scholar
Plant, R., Lesser, H. and Taylor-Gooby, P. (1980), Political Philosophy and Social Welfare: Essays on the Normative Basis of Welfare Provision, London, Basingstoke and Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Reisman, D. (1977), Richard Titmuss: Welfare and Society, London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Rex, J. and Moore, R. (1967), Race, Community and Conflict: A Study of Sparkbrook, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rowntree, B. S. (1941), Poverty and Progress, London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Rowntree, B. S. and Lavers, G. R. (1951), English Life and Leisure, London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Runciman, W. G. (1972), Relative Deprivation and Social Justice, Harmondsworth: Penguin (first published in 1966).Google Scholar
Specht, H. (1981), ‘British social services under siege: an essay review’, Social Service Review, 55: 4, 593–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, H. (1910/1893), The Principles of Ethics, Vol. II, New York: Appleton (the two volumes of Ethics were first published in London by Willians and Norgate in 1892 and 1893).Google Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. and Dale, J. (1981), Social Theory and Social Welfare, London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Titmuss, R. M. (1956), ‘The social division of welfare’, in his Essays on the Welfare State, London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Titmuss, R. M. (1970), The Gift Relationship, London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Titmuss, R. M. (1974), Social Policy, London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Townsend, P. (1979), Poverty in the United Kingdom, Harmondsworth: Penguin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twigg, J. (1994), ‘Carers, families, relatives: socio-legal conceptions of care-giving relationships’, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 16: 3, 279–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warham, J. (1970), Social Policy in Context, London: Batsford.Google Scholar
Warham, J. (1973), ‘Social administration and sociology’, Journal of Social Policy, 2: 3, 193–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warham, J. (1978), ‘Social policy and social services’, in Introduction to Welfare: Iron Fist and Velvet Glove’, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Wilding, P. (1983), ‘The evolution of social administration’, in Bean, P. and McPherson, S. (eds.), Approaches to Welfare, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar