Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T19:22:45.567Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DOES FIRST LANGUAGE MAINTENANCE HAMPER NATIVELIKENESS IN A SECOND LANGUAGE?

A Study of Ultimate Attainment in Early Bilinguals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2012

Emanuel Bylund ,
Niclas Abrahamsson  and
Kenneth Hyltenstam
Emanuel Bylund*
Affiliation:
Stockholm University and University of the Western Cape, South Africa
Niclas Abrahamsson
Affiliation:
Stockholm University
Kenneth Hyltenstam
Affiliation:
Stockholm University
*
*Address correspondence to: Emanuel Bylund, Centre for Research on Bilingualism, Stockholm University, SE 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden; e-mail: manne.bylund@biling.su.se.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Within the field of SLA, the incidence of nativelikeness in second language (L2) speakers has typically been explained as a function of age of acquisition. An alternative interpretation, however, is that L2 learners do not attain nativelike proficiency because of first language (L1) maintenance. This interpretation has nevertheless remained mostly theoretical due to the lack of empirical evidence. This study sets out to address the role of L1 proficiency in L2 ultimate attainment by examining L1 and L2 proficiency in 30 early L1 Spanish–L2 Swedish bilinguals. Language proficiency was assessed through grammaticality judgment tests and cloze tests, and additional data on language aptitude were collected through the Swansea Language Aptitude Test (v.2.0; Meara, Milton, & Lorenzo-Dus, 2002). The results showed positive correlations between nativelike L1 and L2 behavior. Additionally, it was found that language aptitude was positively correlated with nativelike L1 and L2 performance. In view of these findings, it is suggested that (a) L1 maintenance does not hamper L2 nativelikeness and (b) language aptitude is an important factor for bilingual ultimate attainment.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 34 , Special Issue 2: High-Level L2 Acquisition, Learning, and Use , June 2012 , pp. 215 - 241
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2008). The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 489–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2009). Age of L2 acquisition and nativelikeness: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 59, 249–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asher, J., & García, G. (1969). The optimal age to learn a foreign language. Modern Language Journal, 38, 334–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E. (2002). On the reliability of robustness: A reply to DeKeyser. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 481–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Bot, K., & Clyne, M. (1994). A 16-year longitudinal study of language attrition in Dutch immigrants in Australia. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 15, 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bylund, E. (2009a). The effects of age of L2 acquisition on L1 event conceptualization principles. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 305–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bylund, E. (2009b). Maturational constraints and first language attrition. Language Learning, 59, 687–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bylund, E. (2011). Ultimate attainment of event conceptualization patterns in speakers of L2 Swedish. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8, 29–53.Google Scholar
Bylund, E., Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2010). The role of language aptitude in first language attrition: The case of prepubescent attriters. Applied Linguistics, 31, 443–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1981). Twenty-five years of research in foreign language aptitude. In Diller, K. (Ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude (pp. 83–118). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Carroll, J., & Sapon, S. (1959). Modern Language Aptitude Test. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Cook, V. (2003). Effects of the second language on the first. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, V. (2011). Relating language and cognition: The speaker of one language. In Cook, V. & Bassetti, B. (Eds.), Language and bilingual cognition (pp. 3–22). New York: Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, J. (1981). Bilingualism and minority language children. Toronto, Canada: OISE Press.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (in press). Language learning across the lifespan. In Gass, S. & Mackey, A. (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R., Alfi-Shabtay, I., & Ravid, D. (2010). Cross-linguistic evidence for the nature of age effects in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 413–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C., Campbell, S., Bunting, M., Bowles, A., & Haarmann, H. (2007). The development of the high-level language aptitude battery. College Park, MD: Center for the Advanced Study of Language.Google Scholar
Dunkel, H. (1948). Second language learning. Boston: Ginn.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, W. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1999). Age of learning and second language speech. In Birdsong, D. (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 101–132). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Frieda, E. M., & Nozawa, T. (1997). Amount of native-language (L1) use affects the pronunciation of an L2. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 169–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardell, I. (1979). A Swedish study on intercountry adoptions: A report from Allmänna Barnhuset. Stockholm, Sweden: Allmänna barnhuset.Google Scholar
Gauthier, K., & Genesee, F. (2011). Language development in internationally-adopted children: A special case of early second language learning. Child Development, 82, 887–901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grosjean, F. (1998). Studying bilinguals: Methodological and conceptual issues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 131–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakuta, K., & D’Andrea, D. (1992). Some properties of bilingual maintenance and loss in Mexican background high-school students. Applied Linguistics, 13, 72–99.Google Scholar
Hansegård, N.-E. (1968). Tvåspråkighet eller halvspråkighet? [Bilingualism or semilingualism?] Stockholm: Aldus.Google Scholar
Harley, B., & Hart, D. (1997). Language aptitude and second language proficiency in classroom learners of different starting ages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 379–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hene, B. (1993). Utlandsadopterade barns och svenska barns ordförståelse: En jämförelse mellan barn i åldern 10–12 år [Word comprehension in international adoptees and Swedish children: A comparison between children aged 10–12 years] (SPRINS-gruppen 41). Gothemburg University.Google Scholar
Hernández, A., Li, P., & MacWhinney, B. (2005). The emergence of competing modules in bilingualism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 220–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herschensohn, J. (2007). Language development and age. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, C. (1991). An introduction to bilingualism. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, K. (1977). Implicational patterns in interlanguage syntax variation. Language Learning, 27, 383–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyltenstam, K. (1992). Non-native features in near-native speakers: On the ultimate attainment of childhood L2 learners. In Harris, R. (Ed.), Cognitive processing in bilinguals (pp. 351–368). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyltenstam, K., & Abrahamsson, N. (2000). Who can become native-like in a second language? All, some or none? Studia Linguistica, 54, 150–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyltenstam, K., & Abrahamsson, N. (2003). Maturational constraints in SLA. In Doughty, C. & Long, M. (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 351–368). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, K., Bylund, E., Abrahamsson, N., & Park, H.-S. (2009). Dominant language replacement: The case of international adoptees. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 121–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyltenstam, K., & Stroud, C. (1982). Halvspråkighet—ett förbrukat slagord [Semilingualism—a dissipated slogan]. Invandrare & Minoriteter, 3, 10–13.Google Scholar
Jia, G., & Aaronson, D. (2003). A longitudinal study of Chinese children and adolescents learning English in the United States. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 131–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J., & Newport, E. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kohnert, K. J., Bates, E., & Hernandez, A. E. (1999). Balancing bilinguals: Lexical-semantic production and cognitive processing in children learning Spanish and English. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 1400–1413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Köpke, B., & Schmid, M. (2004). Language attrition: The next phase. In Schmid, M., Köpke, B., Keijzer, M., & Weilemar, L. (Eds.), First language attrition: Interdisciplinary perspectives on methodological issues (pp. 1–43). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Krashen, S., Scarcella, R., & Long, M. (Eds.). (1980). Child-adult differences in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, E. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, P., & Farkas, I. (2002). A self-organizing connectionist model of bilingual processing. In Heredia, R. & Altarriba, J. (Eds.), Bilingual sentence processing (pp. 59–85). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipski, J. (2004). La lengua española en los Estados Unidos: Avanza a la vez que retrocede [The Spanish language in the United States: Progressions and regressions]. Revista Española de Lingüística, 33, 231–260.Google Scholar
Long, M. (1990). Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 251–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. (1993). Second language acquisition as a function of age. In Hyltenstam, K. & Viberg, Å. (Eds.), Progression and regression in language (pp. 196–221). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Long, M. (2005). Problems with supposed counter-evidence to the critical period hypothesis. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 43, 287–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. (2007). Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
López Ornat, S. (Ed.). (1994). La adquisición de la lengua española [Acquisition of the Spanish language]. Madrid: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
MacKay, I., Flege, J. E., & Imai, S. (2006). Evaluating the effects of chronological age and sentence duration on degree of perceived foreign accent. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 157–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (1997). Second language acquisition and the competition model. In Kroll, J. & de Groot, A. (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism (pp. 113–140). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2005). A unified model of language acquisition. In Kroll, J. & de Groot, A. (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 49–67). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martin-Jones, M., & Romaine, S. (1986). Semilingualism: A half-baked theory of communicative competence. Applied Linguistics, 7, 26–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayberry, R. (1993). First-language acquisition after childhood differs from second-language acquisition: The case of American Sign Language. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 51–68.Google ScholarPubMed
Mayberry, R. (2007). When timing is everything: Age of first-language acquisition effects on second-language learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 537–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayberry, R., & Lock, E. (2003). Age constraints on first versus second language acquisition: Evidence for linguistic plasticity and epigenesis. Brain and Language, 87, 369–384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNamara, T. (2000). Language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meara, P. (2005). LLAMA Language Aptitude Tests: The manual. Swansea: University of Wales.Google Scholar
Meara, P., Milton, J., & Lorenzo-Dus, N. (2002). Swansea language aptitude tests (LAT) v2.0. Swansea: Lognostics.Google Scholar
Merino, B. (1983). Language loss in bilingual Chicano children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 10, 477–494.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. (2002). Incomplete acquisition and attrition of Spanish tense/aspect distinctions in adult bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5, 39–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. (2004a). The acquisition of Spanish: Morphosyntactic development in monolingual and bilingual L1 acquisition and adult L2 acquisition. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. (2004b). Subject and object expression in Spanish heritage speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 125–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. (2008). Incomplete acquisition in bilingualism: Re-examining the age factor. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyama, S. (1976). A sensitive period for the acquisition of a non-native phonological system. Psycholinguistic Research, 5, 261–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pallier, C., Dehaene, S., Poline, J.-B., LeBihan, D., Argenti, A.-M., Dupoux, E., et al. . (2003). Brain imaging of language plasticity in adopted adults: Can a second language replace the first? Cerebral Cortex, 13, 155–161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paradis, M. (2004). A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patkowski, M. (1980). The sensitive period for the acquisition of syntax in a second language. Language Learning, 30, 449–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penfield, W., & Roberts, L. (1959). Speech and brain mechanisms. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pulvermüller, F., & Schumann, J. (1994). Neurobiological mechanisms of language acquisition. Language Learning, 44, 681–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruben, R. (1997). A time frame of critical/sensitive periods of language development. Acta Otolaryngologica, 117, 202–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruben, R. (1999). Persistency of an effect: Otitis media during the first year of life with nine years follow-up. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 49, 115–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002a). E-Prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.Google Scholar
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002b). E-Prime reference guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.Google Scholar
Seliger, H., & Vago, R. (1991). The study of first language attrition: An overview. In Seliger, H. & Vago, R. (Eds.), First language attrition (pp. 3–26). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C. (1994). Language contact and change: Spanish in Los Angeles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (2002). Theorizing and updating aptitude. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 69–93). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, C. E., & Hoefnagel-Höhle, M. (1977). Age differences in the pronunciation of foreign sounds. Language & Speech, 20, 357–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stroud, C. (1978). The concept of semilingualism. Lund Working Papers in Linguistics, 16, 153–172.Google Scholar
Tabachnik, B., & Fidell, L. (1989). Using multivariate statistics. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Uylings, H. B. (2006). Development of the human cortex and the concept of “critical” or “sensitive” periods [Supplement 1]. Language Learning, 56, 59–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Benati, A. (2010). Key terms in second language acquisition. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Ventureyra, V., Pallier, C., & Yoo, H. (2004). The loss of first language phonetic perception in adopted Koreans. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 17, 79–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeni-Komshian, G., Flege, J., & Liu, S. (2000). Pronunciation proficiency in the first and second languages of Korean-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3, 131–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar