Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T06:44:26.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

INTRODUCTION

High-Level L2 Acquisition, Learning, and Use

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2012

Kenneth Hyltenstam  and
Niclas Abrahamsson
Kenneth Hyltenstam
Affiliation:
Stockholm University
Niclas Abrahamsson*
Affiliation:
Stockholm University
*
*Address correspondence to: Kenneth Hyltenstam, Centre for Research on Bilingualism, Stockholm University, SE 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden; e-mail: kenneth.hyltenstam@biling.su.se.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
ARTICLES
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 34 , Special Issue 2: High-Level L2 Acquisition, Learning, and Use , June 2012 , pp. 177 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abrahamsson, N. (in press). The critical period. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of SLA. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2008). The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 481–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2009). Age of L2 acquisition and degree of nativelikeness: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 59, 249–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2000). Tense and aspect in second language acquisition: Form, meaning, and use. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bartning, I. (1997). L’apprenant dit avancé et son acquisition d’une langue étrangère [The advanced learner and foreign language acquisition]. AILE, 9, 9–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartning, I., & Schlyter, S. (2004). Itinéraires acquisitionnels et stades de développement en français L2 [Developmental sequences and stages of development in L2 French]. Journal of French Language Studies, 14, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bijvoet, E., & Fraurud, K. (2011). Language variation and varieties in contemporary multilingual Stockholm: An exploratory pilot study of young people’s perceptions. In Källström, R. & Lindberg, I. (Eds.), Young urban Swedish: Variation and change in multilingual settings (pp. 1–34). Gothenburg, Sweden: University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Birdsong, D. (1992). Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition. Language, 68, 706–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdsong, D. (2009). Age and the end state of second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. & Bhatia, T. (Eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 401–424). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Block, D. (2003). The social turn in second language acquisition. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Block, D. (2007). Second language identities. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Bongaerts, T. (1999). Ultimate attainment in L2 pronunciation: The case of very advanced late L2 learners. In Birdsong, D. (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 133–159). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bylund, E. (2011). Language-specific patterns of event conceptualization: Insights from bilingualism. In Pavlenko, A. (Ed.), Thinking and speaking in two languages (pp. 108–142). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, M., Murcia Serra, J., Watorek, M., & Bendiscioli, A. (2000). The relevance of information organization to second language acquisition studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 441–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, V. (1999). Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 33, 185–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppieters, R. (1987). Competence differences between natives and near-native speakers. Language, 63, 544–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, A. (2003). The native speaker: Myth and reality. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In Doughty, C. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313–348). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R., & Larson-Hall, J. (2005). What does the critical period really mean? In Kroll, J. F. & De Groot, A. M. B. (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 499–533). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., & Skehan, P. (2003). Individual differences in second language acquisition. In Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 589–630). Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C. J., & Long, M. H. (Eds.) (2003a). The handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C. J., & Long, M. H. (2003b). The scope of inquiry and goals of SLA. In Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 3–16). Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1999). Age of learning and second language speech. In Birdsong, D. (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 101–132). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gass, S. (2009). A historical survey of SLA research. In Ritchie, W. & Bhatia, T. (Eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 3–28). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Haglund, C. (2005). Social interaction and identification among adolescents in multilingual suburban Sweden: A study of institutional order and sociocultural change. Stockholm: Centre for Research on Bilingualism, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Han, Z. H. (2004). Fossilization in adult second language acquisition. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harley, B., & Hart, D. (1997). Language aptitude and second language proficiency in classroom learners of different starting ages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 379–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidelberger Forschungsprojekt: Pidgin-Deutsch. (1975). Sprache und Kommunikation ausländischer Arbeiter. Analysen, Berichte, Materialen. Monographien Lingvistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft [Foreign workers’ language and communication. Analyses, descriptions, materials. Monographs in Linguistics and Communication Studies]. Kronberg/Ts.: Scriptor Verlag.Google Scholar
Hopp, H. (2009). The syntax-discourse interface in near-native L2 acquisition: Off-line and on-line performance. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 463–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopp, H. (2010). Ultimate attainment in L2 inflection: Performance similarities between non-native and native speakers. Lingua, 120, 901–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2003). Incidental and intentional learning. In Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 349–381). Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyltenstam, K. (1978). Progress in immigrant Swedish syntax: A variability analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of General Linguistics, Lund University, Sweden.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, K. (1992). Non-native features of near-native speakers: On the ultimate attainment of childhood L2 learners. In Harris, R. J. (Ed.), Cognitive processing in bilinguals (pp. 351–368). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyltenstam, K. (2010). Critical periods. In Hogan, P. C. (Ed.), The Cambridge encyclopedia of the language sciences (pp. 238–240). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, K., & Abrahamsson, N. (2003). Maturational constraints in SLA. In Doughty, C. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 539–588). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, K., Bylund, E., Abrahamsson, N., & Park, H.-S. (2009). Dominant-language replacement: The case of international adoptees. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 121–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioup, G., Boustagui, E., El Tigi, M., & Moselle, M. (1994). Reexamining the critical period hypothesis: A case study of successful adult SLA in a naturalistic environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 73–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Källström, R., & Lindberg, I. (Eds.). (2011). Young urban Swedish: Variation and change in multilingual settings. Gothenburg, Sweden: University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Kotsinas, U.-B. (1998). Language contact in Rinkeby, an immigrant suburb. In Androutsopoulos, J. K. & Scholz, A. (Eds.), Jugendsprache (pp. 125–148). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lambert, M. (1997). En route vers le bilinguisme [Towards bilingualism]. AILE, 9, 147–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (2003). Stabilization and fossilization in interlanguage development. In Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 487–535). Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (2007). Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2005). A unified model of language acquisition. In Kroll, J. & de Groot, A. (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 49–67). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. M., Clahsen, H., & Pienemann, M. (1981). On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 3, 109–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L. (2009). Understanding second language acquisition. London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
Paradis, M. (2009). Declarative and procedural determinants of second languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavlenko, A., & Blackledge, A. (Eds.) (2004). Negotiation of identities in multilingual contexts. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perdue, C. (Ed.). (1993). Adult language acquisition: Crosslinguistic perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Perdue, C. (2000). Organizing principles of learner varieties. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 299–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M. (1998). Language processing and second language development: Processability theory. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rampton, B. (1995). Crossing: Language and ethnicity among adolescents. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ritchie, W. C., & Bahtia, T. K. (Eds.). (2009). The new handbook of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (2005). Aptitude and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistic, 25, 46–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, J. (1990). On the issue of completeness in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 6, 93–124.Google Scholar
Schmiedtová, B., von Stutterheim, C., & Carroll, M. (2011). Language-specific patterns in event construal of advanced second language speakers. In Pavlenko, A. (Ed.), Thinking and speaking in two languages (pp. 66–107). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumann, J. (1978). The pidginization process: A model for second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Sebba, M. (1997). Contact languages. London: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. (1998). Near-nativeness, optionality and L1 attrition. In Lambropoulou, S. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics: Vol. 1. Papers on Theoretical Linguistics (pp. 17–35). Thessaloniki, Greece: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
Sorace, A. (2003). Near-nativeness. In Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 130–151). Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ventureyra, V., Pallier, C., & Yoo, H. (2004). The loss of first language phonetic perception in adopted Koreans. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 17, 79–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. (2003). On the nature of interlanguage representation: Universal grammar in the second language. In Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 19–42). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
White, L. (2009). Grammatical theory: Interfaces and L2 knowledge. In Ritchie, W. C. & Bahtia, T. K. (Eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition (2nd ed., pp. 49–68). Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar