Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T16:09:18.829Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Environmental Effects Upon Reproduction of a Mushroom-infesting Cecid Fly, Mycophila speyeri (Barnes) (Diptera: Ceciodomyiidae)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Shiu-Ling Chung  and
Robert Snetsinger
Shiu-Ling Chung
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania
Robert Snetsinger
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mycophila speyeri Barnes is presently the most important mushroom-infesting cecid fly in Pennsylvania. Larval paedogenesis is the main means of reproduction (used by this species). Adult cecid fiies and sexual reproduction arc rarely observed in mushroom growing houses. The higher temperatures of spawn-run (70 ° to 75 °F.) are very favorable to paedogenetic reproduction of M. speyeri. Under these conditions, a generation is completed in about one week and about ten daughter-larvae per mother-larva are produced. The quantity of malt in the culture medium, the age of the spawn, and strain differences in spawn also play roles in the length of a generation and the number of young produced by a mother-larva. The lower temperatures (55 ° to 60 °F.), normal during mushroom cropping, approximately triple the time required to complete a generation. Prevention of cecid infestations during the spawn-run and sanitation to prevent spread, once larvae are present, are important considerations in the control of M. speyeri. Adult cecid flies occur only when populations become crowded on old growing media.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 97 , Issue 12 , December 1965 , pp. 1318 - 1323
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Davis, A. C. 1938. Mushroom pests and their control. U.S. Dept. Agric. Circ. 457: 1–21.Google Scholar
Felt, E. P. 1911. A generic synopsis of Itonididae. J. N.Y. ent. Soc. 19: 31–62.Google Scholar
Foote, R. H., and Thomas, C. A.. 1959. Mycophila fungicola Felt: A redescription and review of its biology (Diptera, Itonididae). Ann. ent. Soc. Amer. 52: 331–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussey, N. W., and Wyatt, I. J.. 1962. The interaction between mushroom mycelium and insect pest populations. Musbroom Sci. 5: 509–517.Google Scholar
Pritchard, A. E. 1953. The gall midges of California. Bull. California Insect Surv. 2: 125–150.Google Scholar
Thomas, C. W. 1942. Mushroom insects: their biology and control. Pennsylvania Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. 419: 1–43.Google Scholar
Wyatt, I. J. 1960. Cecidomyiidae as pests of cultivated mushrooms. Ann. appl. Biol. 48: 430–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyatt, I. J. 1961 Pupal paedogenesis in the Cecidomyiidae (Diptera). I. Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (A) 36: 133–143.Google Scholar