Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T00:14:25.482Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A TAXONOMIC CONSPECTUS OF THE BLONDELIINI OF NORTH AND CENTRAL AMERICA AND THE WEST INDIES (DIPTERA: TACHINIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

D. M. Wood
Get access

Abstract

The species of the tribe Blondeliini of North and Central America and the West Indies (including Trinidad) are grouped into 55 genera. Included is an illustrated key to the genera, a diagnosis of each genus, a list of all generic synonyms, and a taxonomic catalogue of all species recorded from these regions, including their New World synonyms. Type status, type locality, and depository of primary type material is given for each nominal species. One hundred and seventy-seven new generic-level synonyms, 67 new species-level synonyms, and 321 new combinations are proposed. Didyma fuliginipennis Wulp, belonging to the tribe Eryciini, was assigned to the genus Ametadoria (see under lectotype designation of Didyma volucris Wulp). Three new species are described: Ligeria latigena n. sp., from Yukon; Policheta crassisetosa n. sp., from Oregon; and Steleoneura novemmaculata n. sp., from Yukon, Banks Island, and Victoria Island. Lectotypes are designated for 93 nominal species.

Résumé

Les espèces de la tribu Blondeliini d'Amérique du Nord, d'Amérique Centrale et des Antilles (Trinité compris) sont regroupées en 55 genres. L'ouvrage comprend une clé illustrée des genres, une diagnose de chaque genre, une liste synonymique des genres, et un catalogue taxonomique de toutes les espèces mentionnées de ces regions, avec leurs synonymes du Nouveau Monde. Le statut du specimen-type, la localite-type, et l'institution où est conservé le specimen-type sont indiqués pour chaque espèce nominale. Cent soixante-quatorze nouveaux synonymes de niveau générique, 67 nouveau synonymes de niveaux spécifique et 321 nouvelles combinaisons sont proposées. Didyma fuliginipennis Wulp, appartenant à la tribu des Eryciini, est transférée au genre Ametadoria (voir sous la désignation du lectotype de Didyma volucris Wulp). Trois nouvelles espèces, Ligeria latigena n. sp. du Yukon, Policheta crassisetosa n. sp. de l'Oregon, et Steleoneura novemmaculata n. sp. du Yukon et des îles de Banks et de Victoria, sont décrites. Des lectotypes sont designés pour 93 espèces nominales.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada , Volume 117 , Supplement S132 , 1985 , pp. 3 - 130
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, J. M. 1923 a. Two Asiatic muscoid flies parasitic upon the so-called Japanese beetle. Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus. 63(6): 1–4.Google Scholar
Aldrich, J. M. 1923 b. A new parasitic fly bred from the bean beetle. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 25: 95–96.Google Scholar
Aldrich, J. M. 1925. Two new species of the tachinid genus Lixophaga, with notes and key (Diptera). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 27: 132–136.Google Scholar
Aldrich, J. M. 1926. Descriptions of new and little known Diptera or two-winged flies. Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus. 69(22): 1–26.Google Scholar
Aldrich, J. M. 1927 a. Notes on muscoid synonymy. Bull. Brooklyn ent. Soc. 22: 18–25.Google Scholar
Aldrich, J. M. 1927 b. A new species of Oedematocera reared from the tropical migratory locust (Diptera). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 29: 17–18.Google Scholar
Aldrich, J. M. 1928. A new species of Oedematocera with notes on Schistocercophaga Townsend (Dipt.: Thchinidae). Ent. News 39: 301–304.Google Scholar
Aldrich, J. M. 1929. Notes on synonymy of Diptera, No. 3. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 31: 32–36.Google Scholar
Aldrich, J. M. 1931 a. North American two-winged flies of the genus Spathimeigenia, with descriptions of five new species. Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus. 80(11): 1–10.Google Scholar
Aldrich, J. M. 1931 b. Notes on the tachinid gents Chaetonodexodes, with one new species. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (10)8: 205–207.Google Scholar
Aldrich, J. M. 1932. Records of dipterous insects of the family Tachinidae reared by the late George Dimmock, with description of one new species and notes on the genus Anetia Robineau-Desvoidy. Proc. U.5. Natl. Mus. 80(20): 1–8.Google Scholar
Aldrich, J.M., and Webber, R.T.. 1924. The North American species of parasitic two-winged flies belonging to the genus Phorocera and related genen. Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus. 63(17): 1–90.Google Scholar
Arnaud, P.H. Jr,1963. Types of the Thchinidae (Diptera) in the American Museum of Natural History. Bull. Am. nat. Hist. 125: 101–138.Google Scholar
Arnaud, P.H. Jr,. 1973. Meigenielloides cinereus (Diptera: Thchinidae) reared from Gamarotettix bilobatus (Orthoptera: Gryllacrididae). Pan-Pacif. Ent. 49: 82–83.Google Scholar
Arnaud, P.H. Jr,. 1978. A host-parasite catalog of North American Tachinidae (Diptera). Misc. Publ. No. 1319, Sci. Educ. Admin., U.S. Dep. Agric. 860 pp.Google Scholar
Baker, C.F. 1904. Diptera Reports on Californian and Nevadan Diptera, I. Invertebr. Pacif. 1: 17–39.Google Scholar
Bigot, J.M.F. 1889. Diptères nouveaux on peu connus, 34e partie, XLII. Diagnoses de nouvelles espèces. Ann. Soc. ent. Fr. (6)8 (1888): 253–270.Google Scholar
Bouché, P.F. 1834. Naturgeschichte der Insekten, besonders in Hinsicht ihrer ersten Zustände als Larven und Puppen. Lief. I, Berlin. 216 pp.Google Scholar
Brauer, F., and von Bergenstamm, J.E.. 1889. Die Zweiflügler des Kaiserlichen Museums zu Wien. IV. Vorarbeiten zu einer Monographie der Muscaria Schizometopa (exclusive Anthomyidae). Pars I. Denkschr. Akad. Wiss. Wien 56: 69–180 (1–112).Google Scholar
Brauer, F., and von Bergenstamm, J.E.. 1891. Die Zweiflügler des Kaiserlichen Museums zu Wien. V. Vorarbeiten zu einer Monographie der Muscaria Schizometopa (exclusive Anthomyidae). Pars II. Denkschr. Akad. Wiss. Wien 58: 305–446 (1–142).Google Scholar
Brauer, F., and von Bergenstamm, J.E.. 1893. Die Zweiflügler des Kaiserlichen Museums zu Wien. VI. Vorarbeiten zu einer Monographie der Muscaria Schizometopa (exclusive Anthomyidae). Pars III. Denkschr. Akad. Wiss. Wien 60: 89–240 (1–152).Google Scholar
Brauer, F., and von Bergenstamm, J.E.. 1894. Die Zweiflügler des Kaiserlichen Museums zu Wien. VII. Vorarbeiten zu einer Monographie der Muscaria Schizometopa (exclusive Anthomyidae). Pars IV. Denkschr. Akad. Wiss. Wien 61: 537–624 (1–88).Google Scholar
Brooks, A.R. 1945. New Canadian Diptera (Thchinidae). Can. Ent. 77: 78–96.Google Scholar
Burgess, A.F. 1897. Notes on certain Coleoptera known to attack the gypsy moth. pp. 412–431, pls. 3–5 of appendix in Wood, E.W., Stetson, S.S., Avery, J.G., Pratt, A., Sargent, F.W., and Sessions, W.R. (Eds.), Report of the State Board of Agriculture on the work of extermination of the gypsy moth. Mass. State Bd. Agric. A. Rep. Sec. (1896) 44: 349–434, pl. 1, 3 photos, pls. 1–5 of appendix.Google Scholar
Bussart, J. E. 1937. The bionomics of Chaetophleps setosa Coquillett (Diptera: Tachinidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 30: 285–293 + 2 pls.Google Scholar
Byers, G.W., Blank, F., Hanson, W.J., Beneway, D.F., and Frederickson, R.W. 1962. Catalogue of the types in the Snow Entomological Museum. Part III (Diptera). Kans. Univ. Sci. Bull. 43: 131–181.Google Scholar
Clausen, C. P. 1956. Biological control of insect pests in the continental United States. U. S. Dep. Agric. Tech. Bull. 1139. i–vi, 151 pp.Google Scholar
Clausen, C.P., and King, J.L.. 1927. The parasites of Popillia japonica in Japan and Chosen (Korea), and their introduction into the United States. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric 1429. 55 pp.Google Scholar
Coquillett, D.W. 1889. The corn worm ot boll worm in California. Insect Life 1: 331–332.Google Scholar
Coquillett, D.W. 1890. The dipterous parasite of Diabroticu soror. Insect Life 2: 233–236.Google Scholar
Coquillett, D.W. 1895 a. Descriptions of new genera and species. pp. 307–319 in Johnson, C.W. (Ed.), Diptera of Florida. Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad. 1895: 303–340.Google Scholar
Coquillett, D.W. 1895 b. Notes and descriptions of Thchinidae. J.N.Y ent. Soc. 3: 49–58.Google Scholar
Coquillett, D.W. 1895 c. New genera and species of Tachinidae. J.N.Y. ent. Soc. 3: 97–107.Google Scholar
Coquillett, D.W. 1897. Revision of the Taihinidae of America north of Mexico. A family of parasitic two-winged insects. U.S. Dept. Agric. Div. Ent., Tech. Ser. 7: 1–156. (Some copies lack the complete index and the errata, and consist of only 154 pp.)Google Scholar
Coquillett, D.W. 1898. Additions to my synopsis of the Tachinidae. Can. Ent. 30: 233–237.Google Scholar
Coquillett, D.W. 1899. New genera and species of Dexidae. J. N.Y. ent. Soc. 7: 218–222.Google Scholar
Coquillett, D.W. 1900. Report on a colleition of dipterous insects from Puerto Rico. Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus. 22: 249–270.Google Scholar
Coquillett, D.W. 1902. New Diptera from North America. Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus. (1903) 25: 83–126.Google Scholar
Coquillett, D.W. 1905. A new dexiid parasite of a Cuban beetle. Can. Ent. 37: 362.Google Scholar
Coquillett, D.W. 1910 a. New genera and species of North American Diptera. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 12: 124–131.Google Scholar
Coquillett, D.W. 1910 b. The type-species of the North American genera of Diptera. Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus. 37: 499–647.Google Scholar
Cortés, R. 1968. Thquínidos chilenos (Dipt., tchinidae) parásitos de Phásmidos (Phasmoidea). Bol. Soc. biol. Concepción (1965–1966) 40: 101–111.Google Scholar
Crosskey, R.W. 1973. A conspectus of the Tachinidae (Diptera) of Australia, including keys to the supraspecific taxa and taxonomic and host catalogues. Bull.Br.Mus.nat.Hist.(Ent.) Suppl. 21. 221 pp.Google Scholar
Crosskey, R.W. 1976. A taxonomic conspectus of the Thchinidae (Diptera) of the Oriental Region. Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (Ent.) Suppl. 26. 357 pp.Google Scholar
Crosskey, R.W. 1977. Family Tachinidae. pp. 586–697 in Delfinado, M.D., and Hardy, D.E. (Eds.), A catalog of the Diptera of the Oriental Region. Vol. III. Suborder Cylorrhapha (exclusive ofDivision Aschiza). Univ. Press of Hawaii, Honolulu. 854 pp.Google Scholar
Crosskey, R.W. 1980. [Chapter] 93. Family Thchinidae. pp. 822–882, in Crosskey, R.W. (Ed.), Catalogue of the Diptera of the Afrotropical Region. British Museum (Natural History), London, 1437 pp.Google Scholar
Curran, C.H. 1925 a. New Tachinidae in the Canadian National Collection (Diptera). Can. Ent. 57: 150–156.Google Scholar
Curran, C.H. 1925 b. Some apparently new nearctic Thchinidae (Diptera). Can Ent. 57: 281–286.Google Scholar
Curran, C.H. 1926 a. The Canadian species of the tachinid genera Cryptomeigenia B.B. and Tachinomyia Tns. (Dipt.). Trans. R. Soc. Can. Sect. V. Biol. Sci. pp. 155–171, 2 pls.Google Scholar
Curran, C.H. 1926 b. Descriptions of new Canadian Diptera [concl.]. Can. Ent. 58: 211–218.Google Scholar
Curran, C.H. 1926 c. Appendix. New Diptera from Jamaica. pp. 102–114, In Gowdey, C.C. (Ed.), Catalogus insectorum jamaicensis. Ent. Bull. Dep. Agric. Jamaica 4(1/2):1–114.Google Scholar
Curran, C.H. 1927 a. Studies in Canadian Diptera—III. The species of the tachinid genera related to Lydella, as represented in the Canadian National Collection. Can. Ent. 59: 11–24.Google Scholar
Curran, C.H. 1927 b. Some new North American Diptera. Can. Ent. 59: 290–303.Google Scholar
Curran, C.H. 1927 c. Some new American Tachinidae (Diptera). Bull. Brooklyn ent. Soc. 22: 144–154.Google Scholar
Curran, C.H. 1927 d. New West Indian Tachinidae. Am. Mus. Novit. 260. 15 pp.Google Scholar
Curran, C.H. 1928. Records antl descriptions of Diptera, mostly from Jamaica. Ent. Bull. Dep. Agric. Jamaica 4(3): 29–45.Google Scholar
Curran, C.H. 1929. New Syrphidae and Tachinidae. Ann ent. Soc. Am. 22: 489–510.Google Scholar
Curran, C.H. 1930 a. Report on the Diptera collected at the station for the Study of Insects, Harriman Interstate Park, N.Y. Bull. Am. Mus. nat. Hist. (1931) 61: 21–115.Google Scholar
Curran, C.H. 1930 b. A new tachinid parasitic on a sawfly. Can. Ent. 62: 246–247.Google Scholar
Curran, C.H. 1932. New North American Diptera, with notes on others. Am. Mus. Novit. 526. 13 pp.Google Scholar
Curran, C.H. 1934 a. The families and genera of North American Diptera. Ballou Press, New York. 512 pp.Google Scholar
Curran, C.H. 1934 b. Review of the tachinid genus Calodexia van der Wulp (Diptera). Am. Mus. Novit. 685. 21 pp.Google Scholar
Curran, C.H. 1934 c. Article III — The Diptera of Kartabo, Bartica District, British Guiana, with descriptions of new species from other British Guiana localities. Bull. Am. Mus. nat. Hist. 66: 287–532.Google Scholar
Curran, C.H. 1935. New American Diptera. Am. Mus. Novit. 812. 24 pp.Google Scholar
Curran, C.H. 1937. Two new Tachinidae (Diptera) parasitic on Polybia species (Hymenoptera). Am. Mus. Novit. 923. 4 pp.Google Scholar
Fallén, C.F. 1810. Försök att bestämma de i Sverige funne Flugarter, som kunna föras till Slägtet Tachina. K. svenska VetenskAkad. Handl. [2] 31: 253–287.Google Scholar
Fallén, C.F. 1820. Monographia Muscidum sveciae. Lund. pp. 1–12, 13–24, 25–40.Google Scholar
Giglio-Tos, E. 1893. Diagnosi di nuovi generi e di nuove specie di Ditteri IX. Boll. Musei Zool. Anat. comp. R. Univ. Torino 8(158): 1–14.Google Scholar
Gistl, J. 1848. Naturgeschichte des Thierreichs. Für höhere Schulen. Stuttgart. xvi + 216 pp.Google Scholar
Greene, C.T. 1934. Tachinid flies with an evanescent fourth vein, including a new genus and five new species. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 36: 27–40.Google Scholar
Guimarães, J.H. 1971 [Part] 104. Family Tachinidae (Larvaevoridae). In A catalogue of the Diptera of the Americas south of the United States. Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo. 333 pp.Google Scholar
Guimarães, J.H. 1977. Host–parasite and parasite–host catalogue of South American Tachinidae (Diptera). Archos Zool. Est. S Paulo 28(3): 1–131.Google Scholar
Guimarães, J.H. 1978. Note on neotropical Oedematocerini, with a new genus and species from Brazil (Diptera, Tachinidae). Papeis Dep. Zool. S Paulo 31: 299–305.Google Scholar
Hardy, D.E. 1981. Diptera: Cyclorrhapha IV, Series Schizophora Section Calyptratae. Insects Hawaii 14: 1–491.Google Scholar
Harris, T.W. 1835. [Part] VIII. Insects. pp. 553–602 in Hitchcock, E. (Ed.), Report on rhe geology, mineralogy, botany, and zoology of Massachusetts. Ed. 2, Amherst, Massachusetts. 702 pp., 104 figs., + Atlas, 17 pls.Google Scholar
Hartig, T. 1838. Über die parasitischen Zweiflügler des Waldes. Jber. Fortschr. forsiwiss. Forst. Naturk 1: 275–306.Google Scholar
Herting, B. 1960. Biologie der westpaläearktischen Raupenfliegen Dipt., Tachinidae. Monogrn angew. Ent. 16: 1–188.Google Scholar
Herting, B. 1963. Ein ungewöhnlich adaptierter Eilegeapparat bei den Raupenfliegen der Gattung Phorocera R.D. (Dipt., Thchinidae). Stuttg. Beit. Naturk. 117: 1–6.Google Scholar
Herting, B. 1969. Notes on European Tachinidae (Dipt.) described by Rondani (1856–1868). Memorie Soc. ent. ital. 48: 189–204.Google Scholar
Herting, B. 1972. Die Typenexemplare der von Meigen (1824–1838) beschriebenen Raupenfliegen. Stuttg. Beit. Naturk. 243. 1–15.Google Scholar
Herting, B. 1974. Revision der von Robineau-Desvoidy beschriebenen europaischen Tachiniden und Rhinophorinen (Diptera). Stuttg. Beitr. Naturk. (A) 264: 1–46.Google Scholar
Jacentkovsky, D. 1937. Contribution à l'étude de la défense biologique contre les ravageurs des forêts. [In Czech. with French summary]. Bull. Inst. nat. agron. Brno (D) 24: 1–54.Google Scholar
Kelleher, J.S. 1966. The parasite Doryphorophaga doryphorae (Diptera: Tachinidae) in relation to populations of the Colorado potato beetle in Manitoba. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 59: 1059–1061.Google Scholar
Lederhouse, R.C., Morse, R.A., Ambrose, J.T., Burgett, D.M., Conner, W.E., Edwards, L., Fell, R.D., Rutowski, R., and Turell, M.. 1976. Crepuscular mating aggregations in certain Ormia and Sitophaga. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 69: 656–658.Google Scholar
Lioy, P. 1864. I ditteri distribuiti secondo un nuovo metodo di classificazione naturale. Atti Ist. veneto Sci. (3) 9: 187–236 [cont.].Google Scholar
Macquart, J. 1843. Diptères exotiques nouveaux ou peu connus. 2 (3). Mém. Soc. Sci. Agric. Lille 1843: 162–460 (5–304).Google Scholar
McAlpine, J.F. 1981. Morphology and terminology — adults [chapter] 2. pp. 9–63 in McAlpine, J.F., Peterson, B.V., Shewell, G.E., Teskey, H.J., Vockeroth, J.R., and Wood, D.M. (Eds.), Manual of Nlarctic Diptera. Vol. 1. Agric. Can. Monogr. 27. Queen's printer, Ottawa. 679 pp.Google Scholar
Meade, R.H. 1894. Supplement to annotated list of British Tachiniidae [sic]. Ent. mon. Mag. 30 [: ser 2, 5]. 69–73, 107–110, 156–160.Google Scholar
Meigen, J.W. 1824. Systematische Beschreibung der bekannten europdischen zweifliigeligen Insekten. Hamm. 4, xii + 428 pp.Google Scholar
Meigen, J.W. 1838. Systematische Beschreibung der bekannten europaischen zweiflugeligen Insekten. Hamm. 7, xii + 434 pp.Google Scholar
Mesnil, L.P. 1939. Essai sur les Tachinaires (Larvaevoridae). Monogrs cent. natn. Rech. agron. 7: 1–61 [ + v].Google Scholar
Mesnil, L.P. 1953. Note synonymique. Bull. Soc. ent. Fr. 58: 50.Google Scholar
Mesnil, L.P. 1960. Larvaevorinae (Tachininae). In Linder, (Ed.), Fliegen palaeark. Reg. 64g. pp. 609–656.Google Scholar
Mesnil, L.P. 1961. Larvaevorinae (Tachininae). In Linder, (Ed.), Fliegen palaeark. Reg. 64g. pp. 657–704.Google Scholar
Mesnil, L.P. 1962. Larvaevorinae (Tachininae). In Linder, (Ed.), Fliegen palaeark. Reg. 64g. pp. 705–800.Google Scholar
Messina, F.J. 1981. Aggregation behavior of Aplomyiopsis xylota (Dipteru: Tachinidae). J. N.Y. ent. Soc. 89: 197–201.Google Scholar
Pandellé, L. 1896. Études sur les Muscides de France (2e partie) (suite). Revae Ent. 15: 109–156.Google Scholar
Perris, E. 1852. Seconde excursion dans les Grandes-Landes. Ann. Soc. Linn. Lyon 1850/1852: 145–216.Google Scholar
Reinhard, H.J. 1923. New Tachinidae from Texas (Diptera). Ent. News 34: 266–269.Google Scholar
Reinhard, H.J. 1924. New muscoid Diptera. Ent. News 35: 269–274.Google Scholar
Reinhard, H.J. 1930 a. On the genus Viviania with the description of two new species from Texas. (Tachinidae, Diptera). Bull. Brooklyn ent. Soc. 25: 102–107.Google Scholar
Reinhard, H.J. 1930 b. Two new North American species of muscoid flies (Tachinidae, Diptera). Bull. Brooklyn ent. Soc. 25: 199–202.Google Scholar
Reinhard, H.J. 1934. New North American Tachinidae. Bull. Brooklyn ent. Soc. 29: 186–195.Google Scholar
Reinhard, H.J. 1935 a. New genera and species of American muscoid flies (Tachinidae:Diptera). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 28: 160–171.Google Scholar
Reinhard, H.J. 1935 b. North American two-winged flies of the genus Doryphorophaga (Tachinidae, Diptera). J. N.Y. ent. Soc. 43: 381–394.Google Scholar
Reinhard, H.J. 1937. New North American muscoid Diptera. Bull. Brooklyn ent. Soc. 32: 62–74.Google Scholar
Reinhard, H.J. 1942. A new species of Oedematocera with notes and key (Tachinidae, Diptera). Ent. News 53: 106–108.Google Scholar
Reinhard, H.J. 1943 a. New genera of North American muscoid Diptera. Can. Ent. 75: 163–169.Google Scholar
Reinhard, H.J. 1943 b. New Tachinidae from northeastem United States (Diptera). Bull. Brooklyn ent. Soc. 38: 78–90.Google Scholar
Reinhard, H.J. 1945. New genera and species of North American Thahinidae (Diptera). Can. Ent. 77: 28–36.Google Scholar
Reinhard, H.J. 1947. New genera and species of muscoid Diptera. J. Kans. ent. Soc. 20: 15–24.Google Scholar
Reinhard, H.J. 1952. New genera and species of muscoid Diptera. Bull. Brooklyn ent. Soc. 47: 1–12.Google Scholar
Reinhard, H.J. 1953 a. New Mexican Thahinidae (Diptera). J. Kans. ent. Soc. 26: 95–102.Google Scholar
Reinhard, H.J. 1953 b. Notes on muscoid synonymy with descriptions of three new species (Diptera). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 55: 243–247.Google Scholar
Reinhard, H.J. 1955. New genera and species of North American Tachinidae (Diptera). J. Kans. ent. Soc. 28: 123–130.Google Scholar
Reinhard, H.J. 1958 a. New American Tachinidae (Diptera). Ent. News 69: 233–242.Google Scholar
Reinhard, H.J. 1958 b. New genera and species of North American Tachinidae (Diptera). J. Kans. ent. Soc. 31: 225–232.Google Scholar
Reinhard, H.J. 1958 c. North American Tachinidae (Diptera). J. Kans. ent. Soc. 31: 277–284.Google Scholar
Reinhard, H.J. 1958 d. Notes on Spathimeigenia with descriptions of four new species (Diptera, Tachinidae). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 60: 207–212.Google Scholar
Reinhard, H.J. 1959 a. New nearctic Tachinidae (Diptera). Pan-Pacif. Ent. 35: 157–163.Google Scholar
Reinhard, H.J. 1959 b. New North American Tachinidae (Diptera). Ent. News 70: 225–234.Google Scholar
Reinhard, H.J. 1961. New American Tachinidae and Sarcophagidae (Diptera). J. Kans. ent. Soc. 34: 204–213.Google Scholar
Reinhard, H.J. 1962. New North American Tachinidae (Diptera). Pan-Pacif. Ent. 38: 215–224.Google Scholar
Reinhard, H.J. 1964. North American Tachinidae (Diptera). J. Kans. ent. Soc. 37: 35–51.Google Scholar
Reinhard, H.J. 1967. New Nearctic and Neotropical muscoidean Diptera (Sarcophagidea and Thahinidae). J. Kans. ent. Soc. 40: 94–110.Google Scholar
Reinhard, H.J. 1974. New genera and species of American Tachinidae (Diptera). Can. Ent. 106: 1155–1170.Google Scholar
Rettenmeyer, C.W. 1961. Observations on the biology and taxonomy of flies found over swarm raids of army ants (Diptera: Tachinidae, Conopidae). Kans. Univ. Sci. Bull. 42: 993–1066.Google Scholar
Riley, C.V. 1869. First annual report on the noxious, beneficial and other insects ofthe State of Missouri. Mo. State Bd. Agric. A. Rep. (1868) 4 (spec. pagination): 1–181, 98 figs.Google Scholar
Robineau-Desvoidy, J.B. 1830. Essai sur les Myodaires. Mém. prés. div. Sav. Acad. Sci. Inst. Fr. 2: 1–813.Google Scholar
Robineau-Desvoidy, J.B. 1863 a. Histoire naturelle des Diptères des environs de Paris. Tome premier. Paris. xii + 1143 pp.Google Scholar
Robineau-Desvoidy, J.B. 1863 b. Histoire naturelle des Diptères des environs de Paris. Tome second. Paris. 920 pp.Google Scholar
Rondani, C. 1856. Genera italica ordinis Dipterorum ordinatim disposita et distincta et in familias et stirpes aggregata. Dipterologiae italicae prodromus 1. 226 pp [ + 2 pp. unnumbered]. Parma.Google Scholar
Rondani, C. 1859. Species italicae ordinis Dipterorum in genera characteribus definita, ordinatim collectae, methodo analitica distinctae, et novis vel minus cognitis descriptis. (Part 2 Muscidae Siphoninae et (partim) Tachininae.) Dipterologiae italicae prodromus 3. 243 pp [+ 1 p. unnumbered]. Parma.Google Scholar
Rondani, C. 1861. Species italicae ordinis Dipterorum in genera characteribus definita, ordinatim collectae, methodo analatica [sic] distinctae, et novis vel minus cognitis descriptis. (Part 3 Muscidae Tachininarum complementum.) Dipterologiae italicae prodromus 4. 174 pp. Parma.Google Scholar
Sabrosky, C.W. 1981. A partial revision of the genus Eucelatoria (Diptera, Tachinidae), including important parasites of Heliothis. Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. 1635. 18 pp.Google Scholar
Sabrosky, C.W., and Arnaud, P. H. Jr, 1965. Family Tachinidae (Larvaevoridae). In Stone, A. et al. . (Ed. ), A catalog of the Diptera of America north of Mexico. U.S. Dep. Agric. Handb. 276. 1696 pp.Google Scholar
Schiner, J.R. 1861. Vorläufiger Commentar zum dipterologischen Theile der “Fauna Austriaca”. III. Wien. Ent. Monatschr. 5: 137–144 [cont.]. [Schiner's first initial was I, but appeared in his publications as J].Google Scholar
Schiner, J.R. 1868. Diptera. pp i–vi + 3–388in Reise der österreichischen Fregatte Novara um die Erde in den Jahren 1857, 1858, 1859, unter den Befehlen des Commodore B. von Wüllerstorf-Urbair. Zool. 2, 1 (B). Vienna.Google Scholar
Sellers, W.F. 1943. The nearctic species of parasitic flies belonging to Zenillia and allied genera. Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus. 93: 1–108.Google Scholar
Shimer, H. 1871. Additional notes on the striped squash beetle. Am. Nat. 5: 217–220.Google Scholar
Silvestri, F. 1910. Contribuzioni alla conoscenza degli Insetti dannosi e dei loro simbionti. Galerucella luteola. Portici Boll. Lab. Zool. 4: 246–289.Google Scholar
Smith, H.E. 1916. New Tachinidae from North America. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 18: 94–98.Google Scholar
Smith, H.E. 1917. Five new species of North American Tachinidae. Psyche 24: 137–141.Google Scholar
Strobl, G. 1910. Die Dipteren von Steiermark. II. Nachtrag. Mitt. Naturw. Ver. steierm. 46: 45–293.Google Scholar
Thompson, W.R. 1963. The tachinids of Trinidad. II. Echinornyiines, Dexiines, and allies. Can. J. Zool. 41: 335–576.Google Scholar
Thompson, W.R. 1964. The tachinids of Trinidad. VI. The larviparous goniines of the carceliine type (Diptera, Tachinidae). Studia Ent. 7: 97–151.Google Scholar
Thompson, W.R. 1968 The tachinids of Trinidad. VIII. Phorocerines. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 56: 1–207.Google Scholar
Thomson, C.G. 1869. 6. Diptera. Species novas descripsit. pp. 443–614, pl. 9 (= h. 12, n 2) in Svenska, K.Vetenskaps-Akademien, Kongliga svenska fregatten Eugenies resa omkring jorden. Pt. 2. Zoologie [Sec.] 1: Insekter. 617 pp., 9 pls. Stockholm, “1868”.Google Scholar
Tothill, J.D. 1922. The natural control of the fall webworm (Hyphantria cunea Drury) in Canada together with an account of its several parasites. Bull. Can. Dep. Agric. [n. ser.] 3: 1–107.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1891. Notes on North American Tachinidae sens. str. with descriptions of new genera and species. Paper II. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 18: 349–382.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1892 a. Notes on North American Tachinidae sens. str., with descriptions of new genera and species. Paper III. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 19: 88–132.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1892 b. Notes on Nortb American Tachinidae, with descriptions of new species. — Paper VII. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 19: 284–289.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1892 c. New North American Tachinidae. Ent. News 3: 80–81.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1892 d. New North American Tachinidae [concl.] Ent. News 3: 129–131.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1893. Hosts of North American Tachinidae, etc., I. Psyche 6: 466–468.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1908. The taxonomy of the muscoidean flies, including descriptions of new genera and species. Smithson. misc. Coll. 51 [No. 1803]: 1–138.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1909. Descriptions of some new Tachinidae. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 2: 243–250.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1911. Announcement of further results secured in the study of muscoid flies. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 4: 127–152.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1912 a. Foundation of some new genera and species of muscoid flies mainly on reproductive and earlystage characters. J. N.Y. ent. Soc. 20: 107–119.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1912 b. Descriptions of new genera and species of muscoid flies from the Andean and Pacific Coast regions of South America. Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus. 43: 301–367.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1912 c. Six new genera of nearctic Muscoidea. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 14: 163–166.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1915 a. Proposal of new muscoid genera for old species. Proc. biol. Soc. Wash. 28: 19–23.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1915 b. Phyllophilopsis, new name. Can. Ent. 47: 78.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1915 c. New neotropical muscoid flies. Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus. 49: 405–440.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1915 d. New western and southwestern Muscoidea. J. N.Y. ent. Soc. 23: 216–234.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1915 e. New genera of muscoid flies from the Middle Atlantic States. Insecutor Inscit. menstr. 3: 97–104.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1916 a. Diagnoses of new genera of muscoid flies founded on old species. Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus. 49: 617–633.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1916 b. Elucidations of New England Muscoidea. Insecutor Inscit. menstr. 4: 17–33.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1916 c. Some new North American muscoid forms. Insecutor Inscit. menstr. 4: 73–78.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1916 d. Description of two new tachinids (Dip.). Ent. News 27: 217.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1916 e. New genera and species of muscoid flies. Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus. 51: 299–323.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1916 f. Designations of muscoid genotypes, with new genera and species. Insecutor Inscit. menstr. 4: 4–12.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1917 a. Miscellaneous muscoid notes and descriptions. Insecutor Inscit. menstr. 4 (1916): 121–128.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1917 b. Second paper on Brazilian Muscoidea collected by Herbert H. Smith. Bull. Am. Mus. nat. Hist. 37: 221–233.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1917 c. New genera and species of American muscoid Diptera. Proc. biol. Soc. Wash. 30: 43–50.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1919 a. New muscoid genera, species and synonymy (Diptera) [concl.]. Insecutor Inscit. menstr. 6 (1918): 157–182.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1919 b. New genera and species of muscoid flies. Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus. 56: 541–592.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1926 a. New Holarctic Muscoidea (Diptera). Insecutor Inscit. menstr. 14: 24–41.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1926 b. Fauna sumatrensis. Diptera Muscoidea II. Supplta ent. 14: 14–42.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1927 a. Synopse dos generos muscoideos da região humida tropical da America, com generos e especies novas. Revta Mus. paul. 15: 203–385.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1927 b. Errata to “Synopse dos generos muscoideos da região humida tropical da America, com generos e especies novos [sic]”. Privately printed, Lima, Peru. [1–12 pp].Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1927 c. New muscoid flies in the collection of the Deutches Entomologisches Institut in Berlin. Ent. Mitt. 16: 277–287.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1928 a. New Muscoidea from humid tropical South America. Wien. ent. Ztg. 44: 143–154.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1928 b. Schistocercophaga, new genus of locust parasites (Larvaevoridae) (Dipt.: Tachinidae). Ent. News 39: 152.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1931. New genera and species of American oestromuscoid flies. Revta Ent. Rio de J. 1: 437–479.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1932. Notes on Old-World oestromuscoid types. — Part 1. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (10) 9: 33–57.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1933. New genera and species of Old World oestromuscoid flies. J. N.Y. ent. Soc. 40 (1932): 439–479.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1934 a. New neotropical oestromuscoid flies. Revta Ent., Rio de J. 4: 201–212.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1934 b. New neotropical oestromuscoid flies. Revta Ent., Rio de J. 4: 390–406.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1935. New South American Oestroidea (Dipt.). Revta Ent., Rio de J. 5: 216–233.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1936. Manual of Myiology in twelve parts. Part IV. Oestroid classification and habits. Dexiidae and Exoristidae. Townsend & Filhos, São Paulo. 303 pp.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1939. Seven new genera of Brazilian oestromuscarian flies. Revta Ent., Rio de J. 10: 446–452.Google Scholar
Villeneuve, J. 1911. Description de deux nouveau Diètdres. Wien ent. Ztg. 30: 81–84.Google Scholar
Villeneuve, J. 1920. Diptères inédits. Bull. Soc. ent. Fr. (1919): 353–355.Google Scholar
Villeneuve, J. 1933. Description de Aplomyiopsis galerucellae n. gen., n. sp. (Tahinidae), parasite de Galerucella luteola (F. Müll.)en Amérique du Nord. Portici, R. Ist. Super. Agr., Lab. Zool. Gen. e Agric. Bol. 27: 125–126.Google Scholar
Villeneuve, J. 1934. Notes diptérologiques. Revue fr. Ent. 1: 180–183.Google Scholar
Walker, F. 1837. Descriptions, etc, of the insects collected by Cpt. P.P King, R.N.F.R.S., in the Survey of the Straits of Magellan, Diptera. Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond. 17: 331–359.Google Scholar
Walker, F. 1849. List of the specimens of dipterous insects in the collection of the British Museum. 4: 689–1172. London.Google Scholar
Walker, F. 1852. Diptera (Part III). pp. 157–252 in Insecta Saundersiana: or characters of undescribed insects in the collection of William Wilson Saunders, Esq., F.R.S., F.L.S., &c. 1: 1–474. London (“1856”).Google Scholar
Walker, F. 1853. Diptera (Part IV). pp. 253–414 in Insecta Saundersiana: or characters of undescribed insects in the collection of William Wilson Saunders, Esq., F.R.S., F.L.S., &c. 1: 1–474. London (“1856”).Google Scholar
Walker, F. 1860. Characters of undescribed Diptera in the collection of W.W. Saunders, Esq., F.R.S., &c [part]. Trans. ent. Soc. Lond. (n.s.) [= 2nd series] 5: 268–296.Google Scholar
Walton, W.R. 1912. A new species of Tachinidae from Porto Rico (Plate X.) Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 14: 198–200.Google Scholar
Walton, W.R. 1913. New North American Tachinidae (Dipt.). Ent. News 24: 49–52. 1 pl.Google Scholar
Walton, W.R. 1914 a. A new tachinid parasite of Diabrotica vittata. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 16: 11–14, 1 pl.Google Scholar
Walton, W.R. 1914 b. Four new species of Tachinidae from North America. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 16: 90–95.Google Scholar
Walton, W.R. 1918. Three new tachinid parasites of Eleodes. Proc. ent. Soc Wash. (1917) 19: 22–26.Google Scholar
West, L.S. 1925. New Phasiidae and Tachinidae from New York State. J. N.Y. Ent. Soc. 33: 121–135.Google Scholar
Wiedemann, C.R.W. 1830. Aussereuropäische zweiflügetige Insekten. Vol 2. Hamm. xii + 684 pp.Google Scholar
Williston, S.W. 1896. XI. On the Diptera of St. Vincent (West Indies). Trans. ent. Soc. Lond. 1896: 253–446.Google Scholar
Wulp, F.M. van der. 1890. Fam. Muscidae. pp. 41–208, in Godman, F.D., and Salvin, O. (Eds.), Biologia cent. -am. (Zool.), Insecta, Diptera 2. 489 pp.Google Scholar
Wulp, F.M. van der. 1891. Fam. Muscidae. pp. 209–264 in Godman, F.D., and Salvin, O. (Eds.), Biologia cent. -am. (Zool.), Insecta, Diptera 2. 489 pp.Google Scholar
Wulp, F.M. van der. 1892. Diasnoses of new Mexican Muscidae. Tijdschr. Ent. 35: 183–195.Google Scholar