Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T11:38:49.463Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

TYPES OF NYMPHULINAE, SCOPARIINAE, CYBALOMIINAE, ODONTIINAE, EVERGESTINAE, AND PYRAUSTINAE (LEPIDOPTERA: PYRALIDAE) IN THE ZOOLOGICAL INSTITUTE, ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE USSR, LENINGRAD, WITH SELECTIONS OF LECTOTYPES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Eugene Munroe
Eugene Munroe
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Institute, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Holotypes, lectotypes, and syntypes of pyralid moths of the subfamilies Nymphulinae, Scopariinae, Cybalomiinae, Odontiinae, Evergestinae, and Pyraustinae studied by the author at the Zoological Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR in Leningrad in 1964 are catalogued. Types of 93 names are discussed; lectotypes are designated for 54 nominal species; 13 nominal species are listed for which type material could not be located. Four names are considered to be nomina nuda.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 102 , Issue 8 , August 1970 , pp. 1025 - 1035
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alpheraki, S. 1877. Lepidoptera Caucasi septentrionalis. . Trud. Russk. ent. Obschch. Τρудьɪ ρусскаго әнтомолοгичесκаго Общеϲтва 10: 1–34.Google Scholar
Bremer, O. 1864. Lepidopteren Ost-Siberiens, insbesondere des Amur-Landes, gesammelt von den Herren G. Radde, R. Maack und P. Wulffius. Mém. Acad. imp. Sci. St. Pétersbourg (7) 8: 1–103.Google Scholar
Bremer, O., and Gray, W.. 1853. Beiträge zur Schmetterlings-Fauna des noerdlichen China's. St. Petersburg.Google Scholar
Caradja, A. 1929. Evergestis ostrogovichi nov. spec. Acad. Romana, Bull. Sect. scient. 12(6):1.Google Scholar
Christoph, H. 1862. Vier neue südrussische Schmetterlinge. Stettin. ent. Ztg 23: 220–224.Google Scholar
Christoph, H. 1873. Weiterer Beitrag zum Verzeichnisse der im Nord-Persien einheimischen Schmetterlinge. Hor. Soc. ent. ross. 10: 1–53.Google Scholar
Christoph, H. 1877. Sammelergebnisse aus Nordpersien, Krasnowodsk in Turkmenien und dem Daghestan. Hor. Soc. ent. ross. 12: 180–299. [pp. 180–196 were published in December 1876 and pp. 197 et seq., containing the species cited here, were published in January 1877.]Google Scholar
Christoph, H. 1881. Neue Lepidopteren des Amurgebietes. Bull. Soc. imp. Nat. Moscou 56: 1–80.Google Scholar
Christoph, H. 1882. Einige neue Lepidoptera aus Russisch-Armenien. Hor. Soc. ent. ross. 17: 104–122.Google Scholar
Christoph, H. 1885. Lepidoptera aus dem Achal-Tekke-Gebiete. Zweiter Theil. Romanoff Mém. Lép. 2: 119–166.Google Scholar
Christoph, H. 1887. See Romanoff, N.M., 1887.Google Scholar
Christoph, H. 1887 a. Lepidoptera aus dem Achal-Tekké-Gebiete. Dritter Theil. Romanoff Mém. Lép. 3: 50–125.Google Scholar
Christoph, H. 1887 b. Diagnosen neuer Lepidopteren aus Tekké. Stettin. ent. Ztg 48: 162–167.Google Scholar
Christoph, H. 1888. Diagnosen zu einigen neuen Lepidopteren des palaearktischen Gebietes. Hor. Soc. ent. ross. 22: 308–321.Google Scholar
Erschoff, N. 1877. Diagnosen neuer Lepidopteren aus den verschiedenen Provinzen des russischen Reiches. Hor. Soc. ent. ross. 12: 336–348.Google Scholar
Eversmann, E. 1842. Quaedam Lepidopterorum species novae, in Rossia orientali observatae, nunc descriptae et depictae. Bull. Soc. imp. Nat. Moscou 15: 543–565.Google Scholar
Eversmann, E. 1843. Quaedam Lepidopterorum species novae, in montibus uralensibus et altaicis habitantes, nunc descriptae et depictae. Bull. Soc. imp. Nat. Moscou 25: 535–555.Google Scholar
Eversmann, E. 1844. Fauna lepidopterologica volgo-uralensis. Kazan.Google Scholar
Eversmann, E. 1851. Description de quelques nouvelles espèces de Lépidoptères de la Russie. Bull. Soc. imp. Nat. Moscou 24: 610–644.Google Scholar
Eversmann, E. 1852. Mittheilung Über einige neue Falter Russland's. Bull. Soc. imp. Nat. Moscou 25: 148–169.Google Scholar
Filipjev, N. N. 1924. Microheterocera des Minussinsk Bezirks. Jahrb. Martijanov. Staatsmus. Minussinsk 2(3): 1–61.Google Scholar
Filipjev, N. N. 1925. Lepidopterologische Notizen. I. Einige neue russische Kleinschmetterlinge. Rev. russe d'Ent. 19: 47–52.Google Scholar
Filipjev, N. N. 1927. Microheterocera des Minussinsk Bezirks. Nachtrag II. Jahrb. Martijanov. Staatsmus. Minussinsk 5: 1–32.Google Scholar
Filipjev, N. N. 1931. Lepidoptera, in: Abhandl. Pamir Exped. 1928, Leningrad 8: 143–174.Google Scholar
Filipjev, N. N. 1934. Lepidopterologische Notizen. XIV. Einige neue Schmetterlinge von wirtschaftliche Bedeutung. Trav. Inst. zool. Acad. Sci. URSS 2: 15.Google Scholar
Gerasimov, A. 1930. Zur Lepidopteren-Fauna Mittel-Asiens. I. Microheterocera aus dem Distrikt Kaschka-Darja (S.O. Buchara). Ann. Mus. Zool. Akad. Leningrad 31: 21–48.Google Scholar
Kṷznetzov, V. I. 1958. Zwei Arten der Gattung Evergestis Hb. (Lepidoptera, Pyralididae) aus West Kopet-Dagh (Turkmenia). Ent. Obozr. Энт Обозр 37: 929–932.Google Scholar
Popescu-Gorj, A. 1964. Catalogue de la collection de Lépidoptères “Prof. A. Ostrogovich” du Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle “Grigore Antipa” Bucarest. Bucarest.Google Scholar
Romanoff, N.M. 1887. Les Lépidoptéres de la Transcaucasie. Troisième partie. Romanoff Mém. Lép. 3: 1–49. (With descriptions of new species by H. Christoph.)Google Scholar
Staudinger, O. 1859. Diagnosen nebst kurzen Beschreibungen neuer andalusischer Lepidopteren. Stettin. ent. Ztg 20: 214–259.Google Scholar
Staudinger, O. 1892, 1893. Beschreibungen neuer palaearktischer Pyraliden. Dt. ent.Z. Iris 5, pl. 3; 6: 71–82.Google Scholar
Wocke, M.F. 1854. Ueber seltene oder für Schlesien neue Falter-Arten. Arbeit. schles. Gesellschaft vaterl. Kultur (1854): 94–98.Google Scholar