Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T11:06:01.364Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Contesting discourses of blood in the ‘red shirts’ protests in Bangkok

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2012

Abstract

The spilling of blood in modern political protest is an exceptional event. This article discusses the deployment of blood as a means of struggle by the members of an extra-parliamentary movement, known as the ‘red shirts’, in March 2010, in the course of their prolonged attempt to topple the government of the Thai prime minister Abhisit Vejjajiva. Two contesting discourses of blood are discussed: the symbolic discourse of blood as a self-sacrificial act deployed by the protesters to curse their enemies, and the medical counter-discourse deployed by the authorities, in an effort to neutralise the protesters' act. Several issues raised by the blood-spilling act are examined: its perceived appropriateness, its ritual roots and its disputed effectiveness as a curse. In conclusion, it is suggested that the blood ritual constitutes a reflective move to counter the prevailing ‘regime of images’ in Thai society.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The National University of Singapore 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Goffman, Erwin, Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience (New York: Harper & Row, 1974).Google Scholar

2 DeLuca, Kevin M., Image politics: The new rhetoric of environmental activism (New York: Guilford Press, 1999).Google Scholar

3 Meyer, Melissa L., Thicker than water: The origins of blood symbol and ritual (New York and London: Routledge, 2005), p. 2.Google Scholar

4 Douglas, Mary, Purity and danger: An analysis of the concepts of pollution and taboo (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 Seeman, Don, ‘“One people, one blood”: Public health, political violence and HIV in an Ethiopian-Israeli setting’, Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 23, 2 (1999): 159–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Hoffman, Lawrence A., Covenant of blood: Circumcision and gender in rabbinic Judaism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996).Google Scholar

7 Titmuss, Richard M., The gift of blood (London: Allen and Unwin, 1987).Google Scholar

8 Seeman, ‘“One people, one blood”’.

9 Meyer, Thicker than water.

10 Aretxaga, Begona, ‘Dirty protest: Symbolic overdetermination and gender in Northern Ireland ethnic violence’, Ethos, 23, 2 (1995): 123–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gustainis, J.J. and Hahn, D.F., ‘While the whole world watched: Rhetorical failures of anti-war protest’, Communication Quarterly, 36, 3 (1988): 203–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11 Vujović, Sreten, ‘Protest as an urban phenomenon’, in Protest in Belgrade: Winter of discontent, ed. Lazić, Mladen (Budapest: Central European University Press, 1999), pp. 193207.Google Scholar

12 Meadows, M., Hippocratis, C. and van Vuuren, K., ‘Targeting the media: Comparing print and television news coverage of indigenous affairs’, Australian Journalism Review, 19, 2 (1997): 7387Google Scholar; Vujović, ‘Protest’.

13 Jon Henley, ‘Thailand's blood protest: What does it actually mean?’, The Guardian, 16 Mar. 2010, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/mar/16/thailand-human-blood-protest 2010 (last accessed 6 June 2011).

14 Hope, Marjorie, ‘The reluctant way: Self-immolation in Vietnam’, Antioch Review, 27, 2 (1967): 149–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Moyar, Mark, ‘Political monks: The militant Buddhist movement during the Vietnam War’, Modern Asian Studies, 38, 4 (2004): 749–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15 Tambiah, Stanley J., Buddhism and the spirit cults in North-east Thailand (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970)Google Scholar; Terwiel, Barend J., Monks and magic: An analysis of religious ceremonies in central Thailand, 3rd ed. (Bangkok: White Lotus, 1994).Google Scholar

16 Guelden, Marlene P., Thailand: Into the spirit world (Singapore: Times Editions, 1995)Google Scholar; Kitiarsa, Pattana, ‘Beyond syncretism: Hybridization of popular religion in contemporary Thailand’, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 36, 3 (2005): 461–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17 Klima, Alan, The funeral casino: Meditation, massacre and exchange with the dead in Thailand (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18 Jackson, Peter A., ‘The Thai regime of images’, Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, 19, 2 (2004): 181218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

19 Ibid., p. 181.

20 Legitimacy crisis in Thailand, ed. Askew, Marc (Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books, 2010).Google Scholar

21 Saying the unsayable: Monarchy and democracy in Thailand, ed. Iversson, Søren and Isager, Lotte (Copenhagen: NIAS Press, 2010)Google Scholar; McCargo, Duncan, ‘Network monarchy and legitimation crises in Thailand’, Pacific Review, 18, 4 (2005): 499519CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Dressel, Björn, ‘When notions of legitimacy conflict: The case of Thailand’, Politics and Policy, 38, 3 (2010): 445–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

22 Pye, Oliver and Schaffer, Wolfram, ‘The 2006 anti-Thaksin movement in Thailand: An analysis’, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 38, 1 (2008): 3861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

23 Nostitz, Nick, Red vs Yellow: Vol. 1: Thailand's crisis of identity (Bangkok: White Lotus, 2009), pp. 710.Google Scholar

24 Ockey, James, ‘Thailand in 2006: Retreat to military rule’, Asian Survey, 47, 1 (2007): 133–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

25 Cohen, Erik and Neal, Mark, ‘Coinciding crises and tourism in contemporary Thailand’, Current Issues in Tourism, 12, 5 (2010): 455–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Prasirtsuk, Kitti, ‘Thailand in 2009: Colored by turbulence’, Asian Survey, 50, 1 (2010): 203–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

26 Emma Chanlett-Avery, Political turmoil in Thailand and U.S. interests, Congressional Research Service 7-570, Report for Congress R40605, 26 May 2009, pp. 1–2; Nostitz, Red vs Yellow, p. 13.

27 Kitti, ‘Thailand in 2009’.

28 Surasak Glahan, ‘Court finds Thaksin used office to enrich family’, Bangkok Post, 27 Feb. 2010; ‘Guilty verdict’, The Nation, 27 Feb. 2010.

29 ‘Up to 80,000 rally, ready for high noon’, Bangkok Post, 14 Mar. 2010; ‘Game on’, The Nation, 14 Mar. 2010; ‘Curtain goes up on political drama’, The Nation, 14 Feb. 2010.

30 ‘Abhisit dismisses call to dissolve the house’, Bangkok Post, 16 Mar. 2010; Casandra James, ‘Red shirts (UDD) splash blood on street and curse Government House in Bangkok, Thailand’, in Asia Travel Examiner, 16 Mar. 2010, http://www.examinr.com/x-2667-Asia-Travel-Examiner~y2010m3d16-Red-shirtsUDD (last accessed 10 June 2010).

31 Maximilian Wechsler, ‘Inside the red city’, Bangkok Post, Spectrum, 16 May 2010.

32 ‘True blood?’, The Nation, 16 Mar. 2010, pp. 1A–2A.

33 Tulsathit Taptim, ‘Bloody politics’, The Nation, 17 Mar. 2010, p. 1A.

34 ‘Nat puan krung sau ni [Accord to disturb city this Saturday]’, Naew Na, 18 Mar. 2553 (2010), p. 1.

35 ‘True blood?’, p. 1A.

36 Anucha Charoenpo, ‘UDD says blood flowed freely’, Bangkok Post, 17 Mar. 2010, p. 4.

37 ‘Lui baan “Mark” [Rallying at “Mark's” house]’.

38 Anucha, ‘UDD says blood flowed freely’.

39 ‘True blood?’

40 ‘Abhisit dismisses call’.

41 Pongphon Sarnsamak, ‘Blood campaign is dangerous: Experts’, The Nation, 16 Mar. 2010, p. 15A.

42 Pongphon Sarnsamak, ‘Reds come good on pledge to splatter Govt House’, The Nation, 17 Mar. 2010, 16A.

43 Ibid.; see also photograph in ‘“Leuad” nong [Puddle of “blood”]’, Baan Muang, 17 Mar. 2553 (2010), p. 1.

44 Anucha, ‘UDD says blood flowed freely’.

45 ‘Lui baan “Mark” [Rallying at “Mark's” house]’.

46 Anucha, ‘UDD says blood flowed freely’, p. 1.

47 Krajog, ‘Blood collection by the bloody-minded REDS is a ritual in Khmer book of black magic’, Free Speech Forum, 16 Mar. 2010, http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/oldguard/2010/03/16/etry-1 (last accessed 10 June 2010).

48 Pongphon, ‘Reds come good on pledge’.

49 Henley, ‘Thailand's blood protest’; see also photographs in ‘“Leuad” nong [Puddle of “blood”]’; ‘Saad leuad baan Mark [Spilling blood at Mark's house]’, p. 1; and ‘Officials move in quickly to scrub off blood’, The Nation, 17 Mar. 2010, 16A.

50 Krajog, ‘Blood collection’.

51 Henley, ‘Thailand's blood protest’.

52 Ibid.; see also photograph in ‘Red shirt Brahman sentenced to 8 months in jail for violating Emergency Decree’, Prachatai, 6 Aug. 2010, http://prachatai.com/english/node/1968 (last accessed 6 June 2011).

53 Henley, ‘Thailand's blood protest’.

54 See ‘New photos of the blood ritual’, GJBKK Blog, 22 Mar. 2010, http://gjbkk.wordpress.com/2010/03/22/new-photos-of-the-blood-ritual (last accessed 11 June 2010); and photograph in Robert Horn, ‘In Thailand, a little black magic is politics as usual’, 20 Mar. 2010, http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1973871,00.html (last accessed 11 June 2011).

55 Pongphon, ‘Reds come good on pledge’.

56 ‘Lui baan “Mark” [Rallying at “Mark's” house]’; ‘Saad leuad baan Mark [Spilling blood at Mark's house]’, Thai Post, 17 Mar. 2553 (2010), p. 1.

57 ‘Red shirts turn up heat in capital and provinces’, Bangkok Post, 16 Mar 2010, p. 1.

58 ‘Saad leuad baan Mark [Spilling blood at Mark's house]’, p. 12.

59 ‘Lui baan “Mark” [Rallying at “Mark's” house]’.

60 Surasak Glahan, ‘UDD takes blood fight to Abhisit and Prem’, Bangkok Post, 18 Mar. 2010, p. 3.

61 Ibid. They could not dump the blood at his house because the police had blocked the approaches to it.

63 ‘Paintings in red blood’, Paknam Web (21 Mar. 2010), http://www.thaiphotoblogs.com/index.php?blog=5&title=paintings-in-red-blood (last accessed 6 June 2011).

64 Pongphon Sarnsamak, ‘Artists create a gory message’, The Nation, 22 Mar. 2010, 14A.

65 See photograph in ‘Blood spill tops strange list’, Bangkok Post, 22 Mar. 2010, p. 3.

66 Richard Ehrlich, ‘Round-up of images from last week's blood painting’, Thailand Media, 140 (2010), http://thailand.media140.org/Bangkok/?p=788 (last accessed 10 June 2010).

67 Pongphon, ‘Artists create a gory message’.

68 ‘Leuad daeng [red blood]’, Khao Sod, 17 Mar. 2553 (2010), p. 14.

71 Supot Wancharoen and Lamphai Intathep, ‘Government “cursed” as UDD protest turns bloody’, Bangkok Post, 17 Mar. 2010.

72 ‘Officials move in quickly to scrub off blood’.

73 Supot and Lamphai, ‘Government “cursed”’.

75 ‘Officials move in quickly’.

76 ‘Thai protesters change tactics’, Wall Street Journal, 16 Mar. 2010; see also photograph in ‘Lui baan “Mark” [Rallying at “Mark's” house]’.

77 ‘Blood tested at three hospitals’, The Nation, 6 Apr. 2010, p. 11A.

78 Apiradee Treerutkuarkul and Aekarach Sattaburuth, ‘Doctors say HIV found in red shirts' splattered blood’, Bangkok Post, 2 Apr. 2010, p. 1.

80 Apiradee Treerutkuarkul and Aekarach Sattaburuth, ‘No proof “bad blood” was UDD's’, Bangkok Post, 2 Apr. 2010, p. 3.

81 ‘Doctors' group under fire over claims about red-shirt blood’, The Nation, 2 Apr. 2010, p. 15A.

82 Apiradee and Aekarach, ‘No proof “bad blood” was UDD's’.

83 ‘Blood tested at three hospitals’.

85 Apiradee and Aekarach, ‘Doctors say HIV found’.

87 Quoted in ‘Blood spill tops strange list’, Bangkok Post, 22 Mar. 2010, p. 3.

88 Nattaya Chetchotiros, ‘Non-violent protest with bloody twist, seen fizzling out’, Bangkok Post, 18 Mar. 2010, p. 9.

89 Thomas Fuller, ‘Protesters dump blood at Thai government site’, New York Times, 17 Mar. 2010, http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/17/world/asia/17thai.html (last accessed 6 June 2011).

90 Nattaya, ‘Non-violent protest’.

91 Suranand Vejjajiva, ‘What's next, after UDD's non-violent blood-letting?’, Bangkok Post, 19 Mar. 2010, p. 7.

92 Nophakun Limsamarnphun, ‘Give peace a chance’, The Nation, 20 Mar. 2010, p. 8A.

93 ‘Thai protesters change tactics’.

94 Quoted in Nattaya, ‘Non-violent protest’.

95 Winichakul, Thongchai, ‘The quest for “siwilai”: A geographical discourse of civilizational thinking in late nineteenth and early twentieth-century Siam’, Journal of Asian Studies, 59, 3 (2000): 528–49.Google Scholar

96 Jackson, ‘The Thai regime of images’, p. 200.

97 Surasak, ‘UDD takes blood fight’.

98 Jonathan W. Peter, ‘A filthy protest that subverts its intent [Letter to the editor]’, The Nation, 18 Mar. 2010, p. 12A.

99 Somtow Sucharitkul, ‘Blood boils over voodoo ritual [Letter to the editor]’, The Nation, 17 Mar. 2010, p. 12A.

100 Thanong Khanthong, ‘Both sides must act to prolong the peace’, The Nation, 26 Mar. 2010, p. 14A.

101 ‘Only bloody fools will believe this voodoo nonsense [Editorial]’, The Nation, 19 Mar. 2010, p. 12A.

102 Yankeleh, ‘Loss of blood and face [Letter to the editor]’, Bangkok Post, 17 Mar. 2010, p. 8.

103 Gub, ‘Get paid, go home [Letter to the editor]’, Bangkok Post, 20 Mar. 2010, p. 8.

104 DeLuca, Image politics, pp. 14–15.

105 ‘Officials move in quickly to scrub off blood’, p. 16A.

106 Supot and Lamphai, ‘Government “cursed”’.

107 Anucha Charoenpo and Aekarach Sattaburuth, ‘Blood rites spark off holy row’, Bangkok Post, 18 Mar. 2010, p. 3.

108 ‘Officials move in quickly to scrub off blood’.

109 Supot and Lamphai, ‘Government “cursed”’.

110 Anucha and Aekarach, ‘Blood rites spark off holy row’.

111 Pattana, ‘Beyond syncretism’, p. 473.

112 Anucha and Aekarach, ‘Blood rites spark off holy row’.

113 Ibid.

114 Ibid., emphasis added.

115 Henley, ‘Thailand's blood protest’.

116 Ibid.

117 Krajog, ‘Blood collection’.

118 Henley, ‘Thailand's blood protest’.

119 Kamol Hengkietisak, ‘Red shirts opt for psychological warfare’, Bangkok Post, 27 Mar. 2010, p. 11.

120 Pongphon, ‘Artists create a gory message’.

121 Vaudine England, ‘Symbolism and belief behind Thai blood protest’, Ajarn Forum, 18 Mar. 2010, http://www.ajarnforum.net/vb/thailand-news-clipping/48772 (last accessed 12 June 2010).

122 Nanuam, Wassana, Lap luang phrang phak phisadan [Secrets, trickery and camouflage: The improbable phenomena] (Bangkok: Post Books, 2009).Google Scholar

123 Craig Reynolds, ‘Book review: Wassana Nanuam, Lap luang phrang [Secrets, trickery and camouflage]’, New Mandala, 6 Nov. 2009, http://asiapacific.anu.edu.au/newmandala/2009/11/6/review-of-wassana (last accessed 6 June 2011).

124 ‘Book exposes dark side of Thai politics’, Bangkok Post, 15 Oct. 2009, p. 3.

125 Reynolds, ‘Book review: Lap luang phrang’.

126 England, ‘Symbolism and belief’.

127 Horn, ‘In Thailand’.

128 See, for example, photograph in Aekarach Sattaburuth, Manop Thip-Osod and Wassana Nanuam, ‘Political parties seek that added intervention’, Bangkok Post, 16 July 2010, p. 1.

129 Pradit Ruangdit, ‘Radicals yet to show their hand’, Bangkok Post, 18 Mar. 2010, p. 3.

130 Supot and Lamphai, ‘Government “cursed”’.

131 Ibid.

132 Simon Roughneen, ‘Thailand's blood-red course’, The Irrawady, 17 Mar. 2010.

133 Aekarach, Manop and Wassana, ‘Political parties’.

134 Anucha Charoenpo, ‘Democrats pin hope on feng shui’, Bangkok Post, 26 June 2010, p. 3.

135 ‘Red shirts back rite to withdraw curse’, Bangkok Post, 8 Sept. 2011, p. 2.

136 ‘Symbolism and beliefs behind Thai blood protest’, BBC News, 18 Mar. 2010, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/8574225.stm (last accessed 6 June 2011).

137 Aretxaga, ‘Dirty protest’; Gustainis and Hahn, ‘While the whole world watched’.

138 Quoted in Olivia Ward, ‘Thai protesters spill own blood’, The Star, 17 Mar. 2010.

139 Suranand, ‘What's next’.

140 Jackson, ‘The Thai regime of images’.