Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-09T03:28:23.263Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

THE EFFECT OF TILLAGE REGIME ON EMERGENCE OF ROOT MAGGOTS (DELIA SPP.) (DIPTERA: ANTHOMYIIDAE) FROM CANOLA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

L.M. Dosdall
Affiliation:
Alberta Research Council, PO Bag 4000, Vegreville, Alberta, Canada T9C 1T4
M.J. Herbut
Affiliation:
Alberta Research Council, PO Bag 4000, Vegreville, Alberta, Canada T9C 1T4
N.T. Cowle
Affiliation:
Alberta Research Council, PO Bag 4000, Vegreville, Alberta, Canada T9C 1T4
T.M. Micklich
Affiliation:
Alberta Research Council, PO Bag 4000, Vegreville, Alberta, Canada T9C 1T4

Abstract

The effect of four tillage regimes on the emergence of root maggots (Delia spp.) (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) was determined on experimental plots seeded the previous year to either Brassica rupa L. or Brassica napus L. The tillage regimes evaluated comprised no tillage, tillage in the spring only, tillage in the fall only, and tillage in both the fall and the spring. Emergence trap collections of Delia radicum (L.) and Delia floralis (Fallén) were made from the experimental plots from early May to mid-July of 1991 and 1992. In both years, emergence from untilled plots significantly exceeded that from plots subjected to any other tillage treatment. Tillage resulted in a decrease in emergence of 55–64% for D. radicum, and reduction of 53–72% for D. floralis. For D. floralis, greatest reductions in emergence following a tillage treatment occurred in plots tilled only in the fall or in plots tilled in both the fall and the spring; however for D. radicum, tillage in the fall, the spring, and in both the fall and the spring reduced emergence to approximately the same extent. Results of our study indicated that canola growers in regions of high population densities of root maggot should cultivate infested fields, preferably in fall, to reduce the emergence success of Delia spp.

Résumé

Les effets de quatre régimes différents de labours sur l’émergence de Delia spp. (Diptera : Anthomyiidae) ont été étudiés dans des champs expérimentaux semés de Brassica rapa L. ou de Brassica napus L. au cours de l’année précédente. Il s’agissait de champs non labourés, de champs labourés au printemps seulement, de champs labourés à l’automne seulement ou de champs labourés au printemps et à l’automne. Les adultes de Delia radicum (L.), la Mouche du chou, et de Delia floralis (Fallén), la Mouche du navet, ont été récoltés dans les champs expérimentaux au moyen de pièges à émergence du début de mai au milieu de juillet, en 1991 et 1992. Au cours des 2 années, significativement plus d’insectes ont émergé dans les champs non labourés que dans tous les autres champs échantillonnés. Les labours ont entraîné une réduction de 56–64% des D. radicum et de 53–72% des D. floralis. Dans les champs cultivés, les D. floralis ont diminué surtout dans les champs labourés à l’automne et dans les champs labourés à l’automne et au printemps; dans le cas de D. radicum, les trois régimes de labours ont eu à peu près les mêmes effets. Les résultats de l’étude indiquent donc que les producteurs de colza dans les régions où abondent les larves de Delia spp. devraient labourer leurs champs infestés, de préférence à l’automne, pour réduire l’abondance des anthomyies à l’émergence.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dent, D. 1991. Insect Pest Management. C.A.B International, Wallingford, Oxon, United Kingdom. 604 pp.Google Scholar
Dosdall, L.M., Herbut, M.J., and Cowle, N.T.. 1994. Susceptibilities of species and cultivars of canola and mustard to infestation by root maggots (Delia spp.) (Diptera: Anthomyiidae). The Canadian Entomologist 126: 251260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dosdall, L.M., Herbut, M.J., Cowle, N.T., and Micklich, T.M.. 1995. The effect of plant density on root maggot (Delia spp.) (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) infestations in canola. Proceedings of the Ninth International GCIRC Rapeseed Congress (Cambridge, U.K.) 4: 13061308.Google Scholar
Finch, S. 1989. Ecological considerations in the management of Delia pest species in vegetable crops. Annual Review of Entomology 34: 117137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finch, S., and Skinner, G.. 1975. Dispersal of the cabbage root fly. Annals of Applied Biology 81: 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finch, S., and Skinner, G.. 1980. Mortality of overwintering pupae of the cabbage root fly (Delia brassicae). Journal of Applied Ecology 17: 657665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, K.A., and Gomez, A.A.. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY. 680 pp.Google Scholar
Griffiths, G.C.D. 1986 a. Phenology and dispersion of Delia radicum (L.) (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) in canola fields at Morinville, Alberta. Quaestiones Entomologicae 22: 2950.Google Scholar
Griffiths, G.C.D. 1986 b. Relative abundance of the root maggots Delia radicum (L.) and D. floralis (Fallén) (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) as pests of canola in Alberta. Quaestiones Entomologicae 22: 253260.Google Scholar
Griffiths, G.C.D. 1991 a. Economic assessment of cabbage maggot damage in canola in Alberta. Proceedings of the Eighth International GCIRC Rapeseed Congress (Saskatoon, Canada) 2: 528535.Google Scholar
Griffiths, G.C.D. 1991 b. Anthomyiidae. Flies of the Nearctic Region 8 (2), no. 7: 9531048.Google Scholar
Jensen, T., and Timmermans, J.. 1991. Conservation Tillage. Agdex 516-3, Alberta Agriculture, Edmonton, Alberta.Google Scholar
Lindwall, W. 1989. Seed and Fertilizer Placement for Minimum Tillage. Weekly Letter No. 2913, Agriculture Canada, Lethbridge, Alberta.Google Scholar
Liu, H.J., and Butts, R.A.. 1982. Delia spp. (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) infesting canola in Alberta. The Canadian Entomologist 114: 651653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews-Gehringer, D., and Hough-Goldstein, J.. 1988. Physical barriers and cultural practices in cabbage maggot (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) management on broccoli and Chinese cabbage. Journal of Economic Entomology 81: 354360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, R.S., and Sears, M.K.. 1992. Assessment of larval feeding damage of the cabbage maggot (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) in relation to oviposition preference on canola. Journal of Economic Entomology 85: 957962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millar, K.V., and Isman, M.B.. 1988. The effects of a spunbonded polyester row cover on cauliflower yield loss caused by insects. The Canadian Entomologist 120: 4547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, D.C. 1991. Design and Analysis of Experiments, 3rd ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY. 649 pp.Google Scholar
SAS Institute. 1990. SAS System for Personal Computers. Release 6.04. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Skinner, G., and Finch, S.. 1986. Reduction of cabbage root fly (Delia radicum) damage by protective discs. Annals of Applied Biology 108: 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stinner, B.R., and House, G.J.. 1990. Arthropods and other invertebrates in conservation-tillage agriculture. Annual Review of Entomology 35: 299318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turnock, W.J., Jones, T.H., and Reader, P.M.. 1985. Effects of cold stress during diapause on the survival and development of Delia radicum (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) in England. Oecologia 67: 506510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turnock, W.J., Reader, P.M., and Bracken, G.K.. 1990. A comparison of the cold hardiness of populations of Delia radicum (L.) (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) from southern England and the Canadian Prairies. Canadian Journal of Zoology 68: 830835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turnock, W.J., Timlick, B., Galka, B.E., and Palaniswamy, P.. 1992. Root maggot damage to canola and the distribution of Delia spp. (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) in Manitoba. The Canadian Entomologist 124: 4958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westwood, A.R., and Brust, R.A.. 1981. Ecology of black flies (Diptera: Simuliidae) of the Souris River, Manitoba as a basis for control strategy. The Canadian Entomologist 113: 223234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar