a1 Department of Language and Communication Studies, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway. email@example.com
a2 Department of Linguistics, University of Ghana, P.O. Box LG 61, Legon, Accra, Ghana. firstname.lastname@example.org
a3 ELTE University of Budapest, Department of Scandinavian Studies, H-1088 Budapest, Rákóczi út 5. email@example.com
There are basically three ways in which the reference of a token of the English proximal spatial indexical here and corresponding terms in other languages can be resolved in the context-dependent, pragmatic phase of the addressee's determination of the propositional content of an utterance that contains this adverbial adjunct. ‘Here’ may refer reflexively to the place of utterance, including minimally the spot occupied by the speaker (token-reflexive reference), it may be anaphoric upon a discourse antecedent that provides information necessary for identification of the referent (anaphoric reference), or resolution of the reference depends on information derived from processing of a perceptual stimulus (deictic reference). These three pragmatic paths to resolution of the reference of proximal spatial indexicals are not mutually exclusive, so they do not warrant postulation of lexical ambiguity, at least not the traditional kind of ambiguity based on differences in conceptual meaning.