Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T18:06:19.880Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Implementing a minimal intervention for chronic fatigue syndrome in a mental health centre: a randomized controlled trial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2012

M. Tummers ,
H. Knoop ,
A. van Dam  and
G. Bleijenberg
M. Tummers*
Affiliation:
Expert Centre for Chronic Fatigue, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, The Netherlands
H. Knoop
Affiliation:
Expert Centre for Chronic Fatigue, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, The Netherlands
A. van Dam
Affiliation:
GGZ Westelijk Noord Brabant, Institute for Mental Health, The Netherlands
G. Bleijenberg
Affiliation:
Expert Centre for Chronic Fatigue, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, The Netherlands
*
*Address for correspondence: M. Tummers, M.Sc., Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Expert Centre for Chronic Fatigue, 4628, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands. (Email: m.tummers@nkcv.umcn.nl)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is an effective but intensive treatment, requiring trained therapists. A minimal intervention based on CBT for CFS, guided self-instruction, was shown to be an effective treatment when delivered in a tertiary treatment centre. Implementing this intervention in a community-based mental health centre (MHC) will increase the treatment capacity for CFS patients. This study evaluated the effectiveness of guided self-instruction for CFS implemented in an MHC, delivered by nurses.

Method

One hundred and twenty-three patients were randomly assigned to either guided self-instruction (n=62) or a waiting list (n=61). Randomization was computer generated, with allocation by numbered sealed envelopes. Group allocation was open to all those involved. Patients fulfilled US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria for CFS. Primary outcome variables were fatigue severity and physical and social functioning, measured with the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS) and the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form-36 (SF-36) respectively.

Results

After 6 months, patients who followed guided self-instruction reported a significantly larger decrease in fatigue compared to the waiting list [mean difference –8.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) −3.8 to −12.4, controlled effect size 0.70]. There was no significant difference in physical and social functioning. However, post-hoc analyses showed a significant decrease in fatigue and physical disabilities following the intervention in a subgroup of patients with physical disabilities at baseline (SF-36 physical functioning ⩽70).

Conclusions

Implementation of guided self-instruction in a community-based MHC was partially successful. The minimal intervention can be effectively implemented for CFS patients with physical impairments.

Keywords

Chronic fatigue syndromecognitive behaviour therapyimplementationminimal interventionrandomized controlled trial
Type
Original Articles
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 42 , Issue 10 , October 2012 , pp. 2205 - 2215
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aaronson, NK, Muller, M, Cohen, PD, Essink-Bot, ML, Fekkes, M, Sanderman, R, Sprangers, MA, te Velde, A, Verrips, E (1998). Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 51, 1055–1068.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cella, M, Sharpe, M, Chalder, T (2011). Measuring diability in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: reliability and validity of the Work and Social Adjustment Scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 71, 124–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Erlbaum: Hilldale, NJ.Google Scholar
Derogatis, LR (1994). SCL-90-R: Administration, Scoring and Procedures Manual, 3rd edn. National Computer Systems: Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
Derogatis, LR, Melisaratos, N (1983). The Brief Symptom Inventory: an introductory report. Psychological Medicine 13, 595–605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fukuda, K, Straus, SE, Hickie, I, Sharpe, MC, Dobbins, JG, Komaroff, A (1994). The chronic fatigue syndrome: a comprehensive approach to its definition and study. International Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Study Group. Annals of Internal Medicine 121, 953–959.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gezondheidsraad (2005). Chronic Fatigue Syndrome [in Dutch]. Gezondheidsraad: Den Haag.Google Scholar
Goedendorp, MM, Peters, ME, Gielissen, MF, Witjes, JA, Leer, JW, Verhagen, CA, Bleijenberg, G (2010). Is increasing physical activity necessary to diminish fatigue during cancer treatment? Comparing cognitive behavior therapy and a brief nursing intervention with usual care in a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Oncologist 15, 1122–1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heins, MJ, Knoop, H, Prins, JB, Stulemeijer, M, van der Meer, JW, Bleijenberg, G (2010). Possible detrimental effects of cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 79, 249–256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobs, HM, Luttik, A, Touw-Otten, FW, de Melker, RA (1990). The sickness impact profile: results of an evaluation study of the Dutch version [in Dutch]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde 134, 1950–1954.Google Scholar
Jacobson, NS, Truax, P (1991). Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 59, 12–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knoop, H, Bleijenberg, G, Gielissen, MF, van der Meer, JW, White, PD (2007). Is a full recovery possible after cognitive behavioural therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome? Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 76, 171–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knoop, H (2008). Efficacy of Guided Self-instructions in the Treatment of Patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Randomised Controlled Trial. Ponsen & Looyen BV: Wageningen.Google Scholar
Knoop, H, van der Meer, JW, Bleijenberg, G (2008). Guided self-instructions for people with chronic fatigue syndrome: randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry 193, 340–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malouff, JM, Thorsteinsson, EB, Rooke, SE, Bhullar, N, Schutte, NS (2008). Efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: a meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review 28, 736–745.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newton, JL, Mabillard, H, Scott, A, Hoad, A, Spickett, G (2010). The Newcastle NHS Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Service: not all fatigue is the same. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh 40, 304–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, P, Bentall, RP, Nye, FJ, Edwards, RH (2001). Randomised controlled trial of patient education to encourage graded exercise in chronic fatigue syndrome. British Medical Journal 322, 387–390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Price, JR, Mitchell, E, Tidy, E, Hunot, V (2008). Cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Online), 16, CD001027.Google Scholar
Prins, JB, Bazelmans, E, van der Werf, SP, van der Meer, JWM, Bleijenberg, G (2002). Cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: predictors of treatment outcome. In Psycho-neuro-endocrino-immunology: A Common Language for the Human Body (ed. Sivik, T., Byrne, D., Lipsitt, D. R., Cristodoulou, G. N. and Dienstfrey, H. E.). Elsevier: Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Prins, JB, Bleijenberg, G, Bazelmans, E, Elving, LD, de Boo, TM, Severens, JL, van der Wilt, GJ, Spinhoven, P, van der Meer, JW (2001). Cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 357, 841–847.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quarmby, L, Rimes, KA, Deale, A, Wessely, S, Chalder, T (2007). Cognitive-behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: comparison of outcomes within and outside the confines of a randomised controlled trial. Behaviour Research and Therapy 45, 1085–1094.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reeves, WC, Lloyd, A, Vernon, SD, Klimas, N, Jason, LA, Bleijenberg, G, Evengard, B, White, PD, Nisenbaum, R, Unger, ER (2003). Identification of ambiguities in the 1994 chronic fatigue syndrome research case definition and recommendations for resolution. BMC Health Services Research 3, 25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheeres, K, Wensing, M, Bleijenberg, G, Severens, JL (2008 a). Implementing cognitive behavior therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome in mental health care: a costs and outcomes analysis. BMC Health Services Research 8, 175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheeres, K, Wensing, M, Knoop, H, Bleijenberg, G (2008 b). Implementing cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome in a mental health center: a benchmarking evaluation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 76, 163–171.Google Scholar
Sharpe, M, Hawton, K, Simkin, S, Surawy, C, Hackmann, A, Klimes, I, Peto, T, Warrell, D, Seagroatt, V (1996). Cognitive behaviour therapy for the chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. British Medical Journal 312, 22–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stewart, AL, Hays, RD, Ware, JE Jr. (1988). The MOS short-form general health survey. Reliability and validity in a patient population. Medical Care 26, 724–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tummers, M, Knoop, H, Bleijenberg, G (2010). Effectiveness of stepped care for chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomized noninferiority trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 78, 724–731.Google Scholar
van der Werf, SP, Prins, JB, Vercoulen, JH, van der Meer, JW, Bleijenberg, G (2000). Identifying physical activity patterns in chronic fatigue syndrome using actigraphic assessment. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 49, 373–379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vercoulen, JH, Alberts, M, Bleijenberg, G (1999). The Checklist Individual Strength (CIS) [in Dutch]. Gedragstherapie 32, 131–136.Google Scholar
Vercoulen, JH, Swanink, CM, Fennis, JF, Galama, JM, van der Meer, JW, Bleijenberg, G (1994). Dimensional assessment of chronic fatigue syndrome. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 38, 383–392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vercoulen, JH, Swanink, CM, Galama, JM, Fennis, JF, Jongen, PJ, Hommes, OR, van der Meer, JW, Bleijenberg, G (1998). The persistence of fatigue in chronic fatigue syndrome and multiple sclerosis: development of a model. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 45, 507–517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wearden, AJ, Dowrick, C, Chew-Graham, C, Bentall, RP, Morriss, RK, Peters, S, Riste, L, Richardson, G, Lovell, K, Dunn, G (2010). Nurse led, home based self help treatment for patients in primary care with chronic fatigue syndrome: randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal 340, c1777.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, PD, Goldsmith, KA, Johnson, AL, Potts, L, Walwyn, R, DeCare, JC, Baber, HL, Burgess, M, Clark, LV, Cox, DL, Bavinton, J, Angus, BJ, Murphy, G, Murphy, M, O'Dowd, H, Wilks, D, McCrone, P, Chalder, T, Sharpe, M (2011). Comparison of adaptive pacing therapy, cognitive behaviour therapy, graded exercise therapy, and specialist medical care for chronic fatigue syndrome (PACE): a randomised trial. Lancet 377, 823–836.Google Scholar