Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T06:43:24.653Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Composing for a Networked, Pulse-Based, Laptop Orchestra*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2012

David Ogborn
David Ogborn*
Affiliation:
Department of Communication Studies & Multimedia, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4M2, Canada
*
E-mail: ogbornd@mcmaster.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Guided by the idea of participatory culture, networked pulse synchronisation and live coding have been core approaches in the activity of the Cybernetic Orchestra, an electronic performance ensemble at McMaster University in Hamilton, Canada. Following general discussion of the way in which networked pulse-based music and live coding work within this orchestra, there is specific discussion of a number of compositional models and practices that have been found effective, including code-sharing, instruction-scores, code as material, and physical performance.

Type
Articles
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 17 , Issue 1: Networked Electroacoustic Music , 14 February 2012 , pp. 56 - 61
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The author would like to thank the members of the Cybernetic Orchestra (2010–11) for their creativity and enthusiasm, and research assistants Alyssa Lai, Stephanie Moore and Rob Petti for their invaluable assistance. This ongoing research has been supported by funding from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) Image, Text and Sound Technology programme, as well as by the Arts Research Board of McMaster University.

References

Collins, N., McLean, A., Rohrhuber, J., Ward, A. 2003. Live Coding Techniques for Laptop Performance. Organised Sound 8(3): 321–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmerson, S. 2008. Pulse, Meter, Rhythm in Electro-acoustic Music. Paris: Electroacoustic Music Studies Network http://www.ems-network.org/ems08/papers/emmerson.pdf.Google Scholar
Jenkins, H., Katie, Clinton., Ravi, Purushotma., Alice, J.Robinson., Margaret, Weigel. 2006. Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century. Chicago, IL: The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.Google Scholar
McLean, A., Griffiths, D., Collins, N., Wiggins, G. 2010. Visualisation of Live Code. Paper presented at the conference Electronic Visualisation and the Arts, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neill, B. 2002. Pleasure Beats: Rhythm and Aesthetics of Current Electronic Music. Leonard Music Journal 12: 3–6.Google Scholar
Smallwood, S., Trueman, D., Cook, P.R., Wang, G. 2008. Composing for Laptop Orchestra. Computer Music Journal 32(1): 9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, G., Perry, Cook. 2004. On-the-fly Programming: Using Code as an Expressive Musical Instrument. Proceedings of the 2004 International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME), Singapore.Google Scholar
Wessel, D., Wright, M. 2002. Problems and Prospects for Intimate Musical Control of Computers. Computer Music Journal 26(3): 11–22.Google Scholar