Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T01:09:40.265Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Re-aligning research into teacher education for CALL and bringing it into the mainstream

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2012

Gary Motteram
Gary Motteram*
Affiliation:
School of Education, University of Manchester, UKgary.motteram@manchester.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper explores three research projects conducted by the writer and others with a view to demonstrating the importance of effective theory and methodology in the analysis of teaching situations where Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL), teacher practice and teacher education meet. It argues that there is a tendency in the field of teacher education for CALL to make use of what might be considered quite traditional research methodology, often drawing on research traditions not connected to teacher education. In teacher education and CALL, research theory is quite often drawn from the field of Second Language Acquisition (SLA), which despite its connection with CALL, is less relevant to the specific combined demands of researching teacher education for CALL. At the same time we are seeing some moves in recent publications and conference presentations towards the use of sociocultural theories as part of an analysis of CALL teacher practices and teacher education for CALL. In this paper, I argue that this is a positive step in the direction of establishing teacher education for CALL as a more mature field of enquiry. In order to avoid the pitfalls of inappropriate research methodology, the paper then presents an argument for a range of methodologies, chosen on the basis of a fashioning of research instruments (Czarniawska 1998), or a ‘bricolage’ (Levi-Strauss 1962/1966) that enables us – in conjunction with the theory – to explore different teaching situations in an informed and effective way.

Type
Plenary Speeches
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , July 2014 , pp. 319 - 331
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barab, S. A., Evans, M. A. & Baek, E.-O. (2004). Activity theory as a lens for characterizing the participatory unit. In Jonassen, D. H. (ed.), Handbook of research on educational communities and technology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 199–214.Google Scholar
Chao, C.-C. (2006). How WebQuests send technology to the background: Scaffolding EFL professional development in CALL. In Hubbard, P. & Levy, M. (eds.), 221–234.Google Scholar
Collins, A., Brown, J. & Newman, S. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics. In Resnick, L. B. (ed.) Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 453–494.Google Scholar
Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Czarniawska, B. (1998). A narrative approach to organization studies. London, Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debski, R. (2006). Theory and practice in teaching project-oriented CALL. In Hubbard, P. & Levy, M. (eds.), 99–114.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Egbert, J. (2006). Learning in context: Situating language learning in CALL. In Hubbard, P. & Levy, M. (eds.), 167–181.Google Scholar
Forman, E. & Ansell, E. (2001). The multiple voices of a mathematics classroom Community. Educational Studies in Mathematics 46, 115–142.Google Scholar
Hanson-Smith, E. (2006). Communities of practice for pre- and in-service education. In Hubbard, P. & Levy, M. (eds.), 301–315.Google Scholar
Hubbard, P. & Levy, M. (eds.) (2006). Teacher education in CALL. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. E. (1996). The role of theory in L2 teacher education. TESOL Quarterly 30.4, 765–771.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. E. (2009). Second language teacher education: A sociocultural perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1962/1966). The savage mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Meskill, C., Anthony, N., Hilliker-VanStander, S., Tseng, C.-H. & You, J. (2006). Expert-novice teaching mentoring in language learning technology. In Hubbard, P. & Levy, M. (eds.), 283–298.Google Scholar
Motteram, G. (1999). Changing the research paradigm. In Debski, R. & Levy, M. (eds.) World CALL: Global perspectives on CALL. Abingdon: Swets & Zeitlinger, 81–97.Google Scholar
Motteram, G., Slaouti, D. & Onat-Stelma, Z. (forthcoming). Teacher education for CALL. In Thomas, M., Reinders, H. & Warschauer, M. (eds.) Contemporary Computer Assisted Language Learning.Google Scholar
Mwanza, D. (2001). Where theory meets practice: A case for an activity theory based methodology to guide computer system design. In Proceedings of INTERACT’ 2001: Eighth IFIP TC 13 Conference on Human–Computer Interaction, 9–13 July 2001, Tokyo, Japan, 342–349.Google Scholar
Peters, M., Murphy-Judy, K., Lavine, R. Z. & Kassen, M. A. (2007). Preparing and developing technology-proficient L2 teachers. CALICO Monograph Series Vol 6.Google Scholar
Robson, C. (2002). Real world research. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Roth, W. M. & Lee, Y.-J. (2007). ‘Vygotsky's neglected legacy’: Cultural-Historical Activity Theory. Review of Educational Research 77.2, 186–232.Google Scholar
Slaouti, D. & Motteram, G. (2006). Reconstructing practice: Language teacher education and ICT. In Hubbard, P. & Levy, M. (eds.), 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization 7.2, 225–246.Google Scholar
Wenger, E. (2006). Communities of practice: a brief introduction. www.ewenger.com/theoryGoogle Scholar
Wilson, G. T. (1978). The importance of being theoretical: A commentary on Bandura's ‘self-efficacy: towards a unifying theory of behavioral change’. Journal of Advanced Behavioral Research Theory 1, 217–230.Google Scholar
Wright, T. (2010). Second language teacher education: Review of recent research on practice. Language Teaching 43.3, 259–296.Google Scholar