Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T13:14:49.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Developing a visual temporal modeller: applying an extensible nlp system to support learners’ understanding of tense and aspect in English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2012

John Kerins  and
Allan Ramsay
John Kerins*
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Science and Information Systems, University of Chester, Parkgate Road, Chester CH1 4BJ, UK (e-mail: j.kerins@chester.ac.uk)
Allan Ramsay*
Affiliation:
School of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK (e-mail: Allan.Ramsay@manchester.ac.uk)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper reports on the development of a prototype tool which shows how learners can be helped to reflect upon the accuracy of their writing. Analysis of samples of freely written texts by intermediate and advanced learners of English as a foreign language (EFL) showed evidence of weakness in the use of tense and aspect. Computational discourse modelling techniques were applied to the data to generate semantic models of fragments of the narratives with particular focus on their temporal structure. These models have been converted into dynamic graphical representations of the temporal relationships between discourse events as the narratives are written. The system also provides access to the ontology devised to model individual events and this offers learners insights into the events’ semantic properties. These techniques provide the basis for a stimulating learning tool capable of capturing key elements of written narratives, and prompting learners’ awareness of language use, particularly tense and aspect.

Keywords

Computational discourse modellingtense and aspect in Englishgraphical representation of learner narrativeslanguage awarenesslearner autonomy
Type
Research Article
Information
ReCALL , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , 04 January 2012 , pp. 40 - 65
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, J. F. (1984) Towards a General Theory of Action and Time. Artificial Intelligence, 23: 123–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, J. F.Ferguson, G. (1994) Actions and Events in Interval Temporal Logic. Journal of Logic and Computation, 4(5): 531–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson-Hsieh, J. (1994) Interpreting Visual Feedback on Suprasegmentals in Computer Assisted Pronunciation Instruction. CALICO, 11(4): 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barwise, J.Perry, J. (1983) Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.Google Scholar
Beatty, K. (2003) Teaching and Researching Computer-assisted Language Learning. London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Bull, S. (1997) Promoting Effective Learning Strategy in CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 10(1): 3–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, S., Dong, X., Britland, M.Guo, Y. (2008) Can Students Edit their Learner Model Appropriately? In: Woolf, B. (ed.), ITS 2008. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 674–676.Google Scholar
Chen, H. L., Cannon, D., Gabrio, J., Leifer, L., Toye, G., Bailey, T. (2005) Using Wikis and Weblogs to Support Reflective Learning in an Introductory Engineering Design Course. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. http://riee.stevens.edu/fileadmin/riee/pdf/ASEE2005_Paper_Wikis_and_Weblogs.pdfGoogle Scholar
Dekhinet, R. (2008) Online enhanced corrective feedback for ESL learners in higher education. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(5): 409–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimitrova, V. (2003) STyLE-OLM: Interactive Open Learner Modelling. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 13: 35–78.Google Scholar
Dimitrova, V., Brna, P.Self, J. (2002) The Design and Implementation of a Graphical Communication Medium for Interactive Open Learner Modelling. In: Cerri S., Gouardères, G. and Paraguaçu, F. (eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Vol. 2363. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 432–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorfmueller-Karpusa, K. (1985) The Expression of Time in Texts. In: Huellen, W. and Schulze, R. (eds.), Tempus, Zeit und Text. Heidelberg: Winter, 39–51.Google Scholar
Dowty, D. R. (1979) Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duerich, K. (2005) The Acquisition of the English Tense and Aspect System by German Adult Learners. Philosophische Fakultaet. Chemnitz: Technische Universitaet Chemnitz.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. (1968) The Case for Case. In: Bach, E. and Harms, R. T. (eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1–88.Google Scholar
Flanagan, T., Eckert, C.Clarkson, J. P. (2007) Externalising tacit overview knowledge: A model-based approach to supporting design teams. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 21(3): 227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fried, M.Oestman, J. O. (2004) Construction grammar: A thumbnail sketch. In: Fried, M. and Oestman, J. O. (eds.), Construction grammar in a cross-language perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 11–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groenendijk, J.Stokhof, M. (1991) Dynamic Predicate Logic. Linguistics and Philosophy, 14: 39–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosz, B. J., Joshi, A. K.Weinstein, S. (1995) Centering: A Framework for Modelling the Local Coherence of Discourse. Computational Linguistics, 21(2): 203–225.Google Scholar
Jaen, M. M.Basanta, C. P. (2009) Developing conversational competence through language awareness and multimodality: the use of DVDs. ReCALL, 21(3): 283–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983) Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference and Consciousness. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2006) How we reason. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kamp, H.Reyle, U. (1993) From Discourse to Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Kazanina, N.Phillips, C. (2003) Temporal Reference Frames and the Imperfective Paradox Proceedings WCCFL 22, Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Kohonen, V. (1992) Experiential Language Learning: Second Language Learning as Cooperative Learner Education. In: Nunan, D. (ed.), Collaborative Language Learning and Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 14–39.Google Scholar
Lehtonen, J-M., Appelqvist, P., Saranen, J. (2002) Learning Operations Management with Web-based Manufacturing Simulation. Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems, Gdansk, Poland. http://is2.lse.ac.uk/asp/aspecis/20020068.pdfGoogle Scholar
LEO GmbH (2011). LEO Deutsch-Englisches Woerterbuch. http://dict.leo.org/Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1991) Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In: de Bot, K., Ginsberg, R. B. and Kramsch, C. (eds.), Foreign Language Research in Cross-cultural Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, W. C. (2010) Introduction to Rhetorical Structure Theory. http://www.sfu.ca/rst/01intro/intro.htmlGoogle Scholar
Mann, W. C.Thompson, S. A. (1988) Rhetorical Structure Theory: Towards a functional theory of text organisation. Text, 8(3): 243–281.Google Scholar
Marcu, D. (1997). The rhetorical parsing of natural language texts. Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-97). San Fransisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 96–103.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J.Hayes, P. (1969) Some Philosophical Problems from the Standpoint of Artificial Intelligence. Machine Intelligence, 4: 463–502.Google Scholar
Nerbonne, J. (2005) Natural Language Processing in Computer-Assisted Language Learning. In: Mitkov, R. (ed.), The Oxford Dictionary of Computational Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 670–698.Google Scholar
Pollard, C., Sag, I. A. (1987) Information-Based Syntax and Semantics, Vol I: Fundamentals. Stanford: CSLI Lecture Notes 13.Google Scholar
Pollard, C.Sag, I. A. (1994) Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, J. (1995) The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1947) Elements of Symbolic Logic. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1971) The Direction of Time. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rutherford, W. E.Sharwood-Smith, M. (1985) Consciousness-raising and universal grammar. Applied Linguistics, 6(3): 274–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, R. (1991) Error Analysis in Purely Syntactic Parsing of Free Input the Example of German. CALICO, 9(1): 72–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R.Frota, S. (1986) Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In: Day, R. (ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 237–326.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. W. (1990) The role of consciousness in in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2): 274–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulze, M.Penner, N. (2008) Construction Grammar in ICALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(5): 427–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimojima, A. (1999) The graphics-linguistic distinction. Artificial Intelligence Review, 13: 313–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. S. (1991) The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sowa, J. (1984) Conceptual structures: Information processing in mind and machine. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
ter Meulen, A. G. B. (1997) Representing Time in Natural Language. Cambridge MA: Bradford Books.Google Scholar
Vandeventer Faltin, A. (2003) Natural language processing tools for computer assisted language learning. Linguistik online, 17(5): 137–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Z. (1957) Verbs and Times. The Philosophical Review, 66(2): 143–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warschauer, M. (1996) Computer Assisted Language Learning: an Introduction. In: Fotos, S. (ed.), Multimedia language teaching. Tokyo: Logos International, 3–20.Google Scholar
Xu, J.Bull, S. (2010) Encouraging advanced second language speakers to recognise their language difficulties: a personalised, computer-based approach. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(2): 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar