Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T07:43:12.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Indirect selection for grain yield in spring bread wheat in diverse nurseries worldwide using parameters locally determined in north-west Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2011

M. GUTIERREZ ,
M. P. REYNOLDS ,
W. R. RAUN ,
M. L. STONE  and
A. R. KLATT
M. GUTIERREZ
Affiliation:
B&W Quality Growers Inc., 17825 79th Street, Fellsmere, FL 32948, USA
M. P. REYNOLDS
Affiliation:
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Apartado Postal 6-641, 06600 Mexico, D.F.Mexico
W. R. RAUN
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, 368 Ag Hall, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA
M. L. STONE
Affiliation:
Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA
A. R. KLATT*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, 368 Ag Hall, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: art.klatt@okstate.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The relationships of normalized water index three (NWI-3) and canopy temperature (CT) with grain yield in north-west Mexico were determined in a set of wheat lines planted in multi-location yield trials. Advanced wheat lines developed by The International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT) were included and tested internationally in the trials including the 24th Elite Spring Wheat Yield Trial (ESWYT), the 11th Semi-Arid Wheat Yield Trial (SAWYT) and the 11th High Temperature Wheat Yield Trial (HTWYT). In north-west Mexico, NWI-3, CT and grain yield were determined in three growing seasons (2006, 2007 and 2008) and three environments (well irrigated, water-stressed and high-temperature), while grain yield was measured at international locations in the same advanced lines of the 24th ESWYT, the 11th SAWYT and the 11th HTWYT . The CIMMYT database was used to obtain grain yield from worldwide nurseries. The mean grain yield ranged from 0·8 to 12·7 t/ha for the 24th ESWYT (59 international sites), from 0·6 to 8·2 t/ha for the 11th SAWYT (28 international sites) and from 0·4 to 7·5 t/ha for the 11th HTWYT (26 international sites). NWI-3 and CT for the advanced lines in the three yield trials measured in north-west Mexico in distinct environments showed significant associations with the grain yield from a few international locations (0·12–0·23 of sites). Locations from Central Asia and North Africa had the best associations with NWI-3 and CT. The lack of more associations may be due to either an interaction of other factors (low rainfall and limited irrigations), which affected yield performance, or few of the advanced lines were well adapted to local growing conditions at each testing site, or a combination of these factors. The present results indicate that NWI-3 and CT have limited potential to predict yield performance at international sites.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 150 , Issue 1 , February 2012 , pp. 23 - 43
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Araus, J. L., Casadesus, J. & Bort, J. (2001). Recent tools for the screening of physiological traits determining yield. In Application of Physiology in Wheat Breeding (Eds. Reynolds, M. P., Ortiz-Monasterio, J. I. & McNab, A.), pp. 59–77. Mexico, D.F.: CIMMYT.Google Scholar
Babar, M. A., Reynolds, M. P., Van Ginkel, M., Klatt, A. R., Raun, W. R. & Stone, M. L. (2006). Spectral reflectance indices as a potential indirect selection criteria for wheat yield under irrigation. Crop Science 46, 578–588.Google Scholar
Baker, R. J. (1986). Selection Indices in Plant Breeding. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Ball, S. T. & Konzak, C. F. (1993). Relationship between grain yield and remotely sensed data in wheat breeding experiments. Plant Breeding 110, 277–282.Google Scholar
Bouman, B. A. M. (1995). Crop modeling and remote sensing for yield prediction. Netherlands Journal Agricultural Sciences 43, 143–161.Google Scholar
Condon, A. G., Richards, R. A., Rebetzke, G. J. & Farquhar, G. D. (2004). Breeding for high water-use efficiency. Journal of Experimental Botany 55, 2447–2460.Google Scholar
DeLacy, I. H., Fox, P. N., Corbett, J. D., Crossa, J., Rajaram, S., Fischer, R. A. & Van Ginkel, M. (1994). Long-term association of locations for testing spring bread wheat. Euphytica 72, 95–106.Google Scholar
Dixon, J., Nalley, L., Kosina, P., La Rovere, R., Hellin, J. & Aquino, P. (2006). Adoption and economic impact of improved wheat varieties in the developing world. The Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 144, 489–502.Google Scholar
Gutierrez, M., Reynolds, M. P., Raun, W. R., Stone, M. L. & Klatt, A. R. (2010 a). Spectral water indices for assessing yield in elite bread wheat genotypes in well irrigated, water stressed, and high temperature conditions. Crop Science 50, 197–214.Google Scholar
Gutierrez, M., Reynolds, M. P. & Klatt, A. R. (2010 b). Association of water spectral indices with plant and soil water relations in contrasting wheat genotypes. Journal of Experimental Botany 61, 3291–3303.Google Scholar
Hura, T., Hura, K. & Grzesiak, M. T. (2009). The usefulness of the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in harvest prediction in 10 genotypes of winter triticale under optimal growth conditions. Plant Biosystems 143, 496–503.Google Scholar
Lage, J. & Trethowan, R. M. (2008). CIMMYT's use of synthetic hexaploid wheat in breeding for adaptation to rainfed environments globally. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59, 461–469.Google Scholar
Lage, J., Trethowan, R. M. & Hernandez, E. (2008). Identification of site similarities in western and central Asia using CIMMYT international wheat yield data. Plant Breeding 127, 350–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillemo, M., Van Ginkel, M., Trethowan, R. M., Hernandez, E. & Rajaram, S. (2004). Associations among international CIMMYT bread wheat yield testing locations in high rainfall areas and their implications for wheat breeding. Crop Science 44, 1163–1169.Google Scholar
Lillemo, M., Van Ginkel, M., Trethowan, R. M., Hernandez, E. & Crossa, J. (2005). Differential adaptation of CIMMYT bread wheat to global high temperature environments. Crop Science 45, 2443–2453.Google Scholar
Marti, J., Bort, J., Slafer, G. A. & Araus, J. L. (2007). Can wheat yield be assessed by early measurements of normalized difference vegetation index? Annual Applied of Biology 150, 253–257.Google Scholar
Mohammadi, R., Amri, A., Haghparast, R., Sadeghzadeh, D., Armion, M. & Ahmadi, M. M. (2009). Pattern analysis of genotype-by-environment interaction for grain yield in durum wheat. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 147, 537–545.Google Scholar
Milligan, S. B., Balzarini, M. & White, W. H. (2003). Broad-sense heritabilities, genetic correlations, and selection indices for sugarcane borer resistance and their relation to yield loss. Crop Science 43, 1729–1735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munjal, R. & Dhanda, S. S. (2005). Physiological evaluation of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes for drought resistance. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 65, 307–308.Google Scholar
Osborne, S. L., Schepers, J. S., Francis, D. D. & Schlemmer, M. R. (2002). Use of spectral radiance to estimate in-season biomass and grain yield in nitrogen and water stressed corn. Crop Science 42, 165–171.Google Scholar
Penuelas, J., Filella, I., Biel, C., Serrano, L. & Savé, R. (1993). The reflectance at the 950–970 nm region as an indicator of plant water status. International Journal of Remote Sensing 14, 1887–1905.Google Scholar
Peterson, C. J. & Pfeiffer, W. H. (1989). International winter wheat evaluation: relationships among test sites based on cultivar performance. Crop Science 29, 276–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prasad, B., Carver, B. F., Stone, M. L., Babar, M. A., Raun, W. R. & Klatt, A. R. (2007). Genetic analysis of indirect selection for winter wheat grain yield using spectral reflectance indices. Crop Science 47, 1416–1425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raun, W. R., Solie, J. B., Johnson, G. V., Stone, M. L., Lukina, E. V., Thomson, W. E. & Schepers, J. S. (2001). In-season prediction of potential grain yield in winter wheat using canopy reflectance. Agronomy Journal 93, 131–138.Google Scholar
Reynolds, M. P. & Borlaug, N. E. (2006). Impacts of breeding on international collaborative wheat improvement. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 144, 3–17.Google Scholar
Reynolds, M. P., Rajaram, S. & Sayre, K. D. (1999). Physiological and genetic changes of irrigated wheat in the post-green revolution period and approaches for meeting projected global demand. Crop Science 39, 1611–1621.Google Scholar
Reynolds, M. P., Trethowan, R., Crossa, J., Vargas, M. & Sayre, K. D. (2002). Physiological factors associated with genotype by environment interaction in wheat. Field Crops Research 75, 139–160.Google Scholar
Reynolds, M. P., Dreccer, F. & Trethowan, R. (2007). Drought adaptive traits derived from wheat wild relatives and landraces. Journal of Experimental Botany 58, 177–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richards, R. A. (1982). Breeding and selecting for drought resistant wheat. In Drought Resistance in Crops with Emphasis on Rice, pp. 303–316. Manila, Philippines: IRRI.Google Scholar
SAS Institute (2001). The SAS System for Windows, version 8.2. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Sener, O., Arslan, M., Soysal, Y. & Erayman, M. (2009). Estimates of relative yield potential and genetic improvement of wheat cultivars in the Mediterranean region. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 147, 323–332.Google Scholar
Shorter, R., Lawn, R. J. & Hammer, G. L. (1991). Improving genotypic adaptation in crops – A role for breeders, physiologists and modellers. Experimental Agriculture 27, 155–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trethowan, R. M. & Crossa, J. (2007). Lessons learnt from forty years of international spring bread wheat trials. Euphytica 157, 385–390.Google Scholar
Trethowan, R. M., Crossa, J., Van Ginkel, M. & Rajaram, S. (2001). Relationships among bread wheat international yield testing locations in dry areas. Crop Science 41, 1461–1469.Google Scholar
Trethowan, R. M., Van Ginkel, M. & Rajaram, S. (2002). Progress in breeding wheat for yield and adaptation in global drought affected environments. Crop Science 42, 1441–1446.Google Scholar
Trethowan, R. M., Van Ginkel, M., Ammar, K., Crossa, J., Payne, T. S., Cukadar, B., Rajaram, S. & Hernandez, E. (2003). Associations among twenty years of international bread wheat yield evaluation environments. Crop Science 43, 1698–1711.Google Scholar
Xue, G. P., McIntyre, C. L., Rattey, A. R., Van Herwaarden, A. F. & Shorter, R. (2009). Use of dry matter content as a rapid and low-cost estimate for ranking genotypic differences in water-soluble carbohydrate concentrations in the stem and leaf sheath of Triticum aestivum. Crop and Pasture Science 60, 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zadoks, J. C., Chang, T. T. & Konzak, C. F. (1974). A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415–421.Google Scholar