Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T00:05:17.672Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Instability wave models for the near-field fluctuations of turbulent jets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2011

K. Gudmundsson*
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering and Applied Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
Tim Colonius
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering and Applied Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
*
Email address for correspondence: k.gudmundsson@utwente.nl

Abstract

Previous work has shown that aspects of the evolution of large-scale structures, particularly in forced and transitional mixing layers and jets, can be described by linear and nonlinear stability theories. However, questions persist as to the choice of the basic (steady) flow field to perturb, and the extent to which disturbances in natural (unforced), initially turbulent jets may be modelled with the theory. For unforced jets, identification is made difficult by the lack of a phase reference that would permit a portion of the signal associated with the instability wave to be isolated from other, uncorrelated fluctuations. In this paper, we investigate the extent to which pressure and velocity fluctuations in subsonic, turbulent round jets can be described as linear perturbations to the mean flow field. The disturbances are expanded about the experimentally measured jet mean flow field, and evolved using linear parabolized stability equations (PSE) that account, in an approximate way, for the weakly non-parallel jet mean flow field. We utilize data from an extensive microphone array that measures pressure fluctuations just outside the jet shear layer to show that, up to an unknown initial disturbance spectrum, the phase, wavelength, and amplitude envelope of convecting wavepackets agree well with PSE solutions at frequencies and azimuthal wavenumbers that can be accurately measured with the array. We next apply the proper orthogonal decomposition to near-field velocity fluctuations measured with particle image velocimetry, and show that the structure of the most energetic modes is also similar to eigenfunctions from the linear theory. Importantly, the amplitudes of the modes inferred from the velocity fluctuations are in reasonable agreement with those identified from the microphone array. The results therefore suggest that, to predict, with reasonable accuracy, the evolution of the largest-scale structures that comprise the most energetic portion of the turbulent spectrum of natural jets, nonlinear effects need only be indirectly accounted for by considering perturbations to the mean turbulent flow field, while neglecting any non-zero frequency disturbance interactions.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Present address: University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands.

References

1. Arndt, R. E. A., Long, D. & Glauser, M. 1997 The proper orthogonal decomposition of pressure fluctuations surrounding a turbulent jet. J. Fluid Mech. 340, 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Balakumar, P. 1998 Prediction of supersonic jet noise. AIAA Paper 1998–1057.Google Scholar
3. Bertolotti, F. P. & Herbert, T. 1991 Analysis of the linear stability of compressible boundary layers using the PSE. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 3, 117124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Bertolotti, F. P., Herbert, T. & Spalart, P. R. 1992 Linear and nonlinear stability of the Blasius boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 242, 441474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Bridges, J. & Wernet, M. P. 2003 Measurements of the aeroacoustic sound source in hot jets. AIAA Paper 2003-3130.Google Scholar
6. Brown, G. L. & Roshko, A. 1974 On density effects and large structure in turbulent mixing layers. J. Fluid Mech. 64, 775816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Chang, C. L., Malik, M. R., Erlebacher, G. & Hussaini, M. Y. 1993 Linear and nonlinear PSE for compressible boundary layers. Tech. Rep. ICASE 93–70.Google Scholar
8. Cheung, L. & Lele, S. 2009 Linear and nonlinear processes in two-dimensional mixing layer dynamics and sound radiation. J. Fluid Mech. 625, 321351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Chomaz, J. 2005 Global instabilities in spatially developing flows: non-normality and nonlinearity. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 37 (1), 357392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Cohen, J. & Wygnanski, I. 1987 The evolution of instabilities in the axisymmetric jet. Part 1. The linear growth of disturbances near the nozzle. J. Fluid Mech. 176, 191219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Colonius, T., Samanta, A. & Gudmundsson, K. 2010 Parabolized stability equation models of large-scale jet mixing noise. Procedia Engng 6, 6473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Crighton, D. G. & Gaster, M. 1976 Stability of slowly diverging jet flow. J. Fluid Mech. 77, 397413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Crow, S. C. & Champagne, F. H. 1971 Orderly structure in jet turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 48, 547591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Day, M. J., Mansour, N. N. & Reynolds, W. C. 2001 Nonlinear stability and structure of compressible reacting mixing layers. J. Fluid Mech. 446, 375408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Fleury, V., Bailly, C. & Juve, D. 2005 Shear-layer acoustic radiation in an excited subsonic jet: models for vortex pairing and superdirective noise. C. R. Méc. 333 (10), 754761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Gaster, M., Kit, E. & Wygnanski, I. 1985 Large-scale structures in a forced turbulent mixing layer. J. Fluid Mech. 150, 2339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. George, W. K., Beuther, P D & Arndt, R. E. A. 1984 Pressure spectra in turbulent free shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 148, 155191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Gudmundsson, K. 2010 Instability wave models of turbulent jets from round and serrated nozzles. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
19. Gudmundsson, K. & Colonius, T. 2009 Parabolized stability equation models for turbulent jets and their radiated sound. AIAA Paper 2009-3380.Google Scholar
20. Herbert, T. 1997 Parabolized stability equations. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 29, 245283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Huerre, P. & Crighton, D. G. 1983 Sound generation by instability waves in a low Mach number jet. AIAA Paper 1983-0661.Google Scholar
22. Hussain, A. K. M. F. & Reynolds, W. C. 1970 The mechanics of an organized wave in turbulent shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 41, 241258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Laufer, J. & Yen, T. C. 1983 Noise generation by a low-mach-number jet. J. Fluid Mech. 134, 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Lesshafft, L. & Huerre, P. 2007 Linear impulse response in hot round jets. Phys. Fluids 19, 024102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Li, F. & Malik, M. R. 1996 On the nature of PSE approximation. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 8, 253273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Li, F. & Malik, M. R. 1997 Spectral analysis of parabolized stability equations. Comput. Fluids 26, 279297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Lighthill, M. J. 1952 On sound generated aerodynamically. I. General theory. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 211 (1107), 564587.Google Scholar
28. Lumley, J. L. 1967 The structure of inhomogeneous turbulent flows. In Atmospheric Turbulence and Radio Wave Propagation (ed. Yaglom, A. M. & Tatarski, V. I. ). pp. 116178. Nauka.Google Scholar
29. Maestrello, L. & Fung, Y. T. 1979 Quasi-periodic structure of a turbulent jet. J. Sound Vib. 64, 107122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Malik, M. R. & Chang, C. L. 2000 Non-parallel and nonlinear stability of supersonic jet flow. Comput. Fluids 29, 327365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31. Malkus, W. V. R. 1956 Outline of a theory of turbulent shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 1 (5), 521539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32. Mankbadi, R. R. 1985 On the interaction between fundamental and subharmonic instability waves in a turbulent round jet. J. Fluid Mech. 160, 385419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33. Mankbadi, R. & Liu, J. T. C. 1981 A study of the interactions between large-scale coherent structures and fine-grained turbulence in a round jet. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 298 (1443), 541602.Google Scholar
34. Mattingly, G. E. & Chang, C. C. 1974 Unstable waves on an axisymmetric jet column. J. Fluid Mech. 65, 541560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35. Michalke, A. & Fuchs, H. V. 1975 On turbulence and noise of an axisymmetric shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 70, 179205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36. Mohseni, K., Colonius, T. & Freund, J. B. 2002 An evaluation of linear instability waves as sources of sound in a supersonic turbulent jet. Phys. Fluids 14, 3593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37. Mollo-Christensen, E. 1967 Jet noise and shear flow instability seen from an experimenter’s viewpoint. J. Appl. Mech. 34, 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38. Monkewitz, P. A. & Sohn, K. D. 1988 Absolute instability in hot jets. AIAA J. 26 911916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39. Moore, C. J. 1977 The role of shear-layer instability waves in jet exhaust noise. J. Fluid Mech. 80, 321367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40. Morris, P. J., Giridharan, M. G. & Lilley, G. M. 1990 On the turbulent mixing of compressible free shear layers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 431 (1882), 219243.Google Scholar
41. Petersen, R. A. & Samet, M. M. 1988 On the preferred mode of jet instability. J. Fluid Mech. 194, 153173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42. Pinier, J. T., Hall, J. W. & Glauser, M. N. 2006 Identifying the most energetic modes of the pressure near-field region of a Mach 0.85 axisymmetric jet. AIAA Paper 2006-314.Google Scholar
43. Piot, E., Casalis, G., Muller, F. & Bailly, C. 2006 Investigation of the PSE approach for subsonic and supersonic hot jets. Detailed comparisons with LES and linearized Euler equations results. Intl J. Aeroacoust. 5, 361393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44. Ray, P. K., Cheung, L. C. & Lele, S. K. 2009 On the growth and propagation of linear instability waves in compressible turbulent jets. Phys. Fluids 21, 054106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45. Reba, R., Narayanan, S. & Colonius, T. 2010 Wave-packet models for large-scale mixing noise. Intl J. Aeroacoust. 9, 533558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46. Rodriguez, D., Samanta, A., Cavalieri, A. V. G. & Colonius, T. 2011 Parabolized stability equation models for predicting large-scale mixing noise of turbulent round jets. AIAA Paper, 2838.Google Scholar
47. Strange, P. J. R. & Crighton, D. G. 1983 Spinning modes on axisymmetric jets. Part 1. J. Fluid Mech. 134, 231245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48. Suzuki, T. & Colonius, T. 2006 Instability waves in a subsonic round jet detected using a near-field phased microphone array. J. Fluid Mech. 565, 197226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49. Tam, C. K. W. & Burton, D. E. 1984 Sound generated by instability waves of supersonic flows. Part 2. Axisymmetric jets. J. Fluid Mech. 138, 273295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
50. Tam, C. K. W. & Morris, P. J. 1985 Tone excited jets. Part V. A theoretical model and comparison with experiment. J. Sound Vib. 102 (1), 119151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
51. Tanna, H. K. 1977 An experimental study of jet noise. Part I. Turbulent mixing noise. J. Sound Vib. 50, 405428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
52. Tanna, H. K. & Ahuja, K. K. 1985 Tone excited jets. Part I. Introduction. J. Sound Vib. 102 (1), 5761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
53. Thompson, K. W. 1987 Time dependent boundary conditions for hyperbolic systems. J. Comput. Phys. 68, 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54. Tinney, C. & Jordan, P. 2008 The near pressure field of co-axial subsonic jets. J. Fluid Mech. 611, 175204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
55. Troutt, T. R. & McLaughlin, D. K. 1982 Experiments on the flow and acoustic properties of a moderate-Reynolds-number supersonic jet. J. Fluid Mech. 116, 123156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
56. Winant, C. D. & Browand, F. K. 1974 Vortex pairing: the mechanism of turbulent mixing-layer growth at moderate Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 63, 237255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
57. Yen, C. C. & Messersmith, N. L. 1998 Application of parabolized stability equations to the prediction of jet instabilities. AIAA J. 36, 15411544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
58. Zaman, K B M Q & Hussain, A. K. M. F. 1980 Vortex pairing in a circular jet under controlled excitation. Part 1. General jet response. J. Fluid Mech. 101, 449491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar