Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T05:56:40.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phrasal verbs: ‘a process of the common, relatively uneducated, mind’?

Are phrasal verbs the victims of linguistic discrimination?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 November 2011

Kate Wild
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

If you look through a modern guide to English usage, you will probably find that it has something to say about phrasal verbs. It might be a warning not to use certain phrasal verbs in certain contexts. For example, Allen (2005: 181–90) offers a table of ‘more formal alternatives to those phrasal verbs that can sometimes be too informal for writing’, with suggestions for replacing sum up with conclude and step down with resign, among others. In many cases, it will be a warning about phrasal verbs where the adverbial particle adds little semantic content to the verb: The Chicago Manual of Style advises writers to ‘avoid the phrasal verb if the verb alone conveys essentially the same meaning – e.g. rest up is equivalent to rest’ (2003: 174). It might attribute such usages to American English, as in Evans' (2000: 54–5) comment that phrasal verbs such as win out, stop off and check up on, which ‘grow like toadstools’, are ‘American parasites’. It might be a positive comment, such as Bryson's note that phrasal verbs are ‘one of the most versatile features of English’, but if so, it will probably be qualified: Bryson adds that in many cases the added particles ‘are merely a sign of careless writing’ (Bryson, 2002: 156–7). What is it about phrasal verbs that provokes such comments? By examining grammars, usage books, dictionaries and other materials since the eighteenth century, I will discuss changing attitudes towards phrasal verbs and how they fit into the context of broader opinions about language.

Type
Original Article
Information
English Today , Volume 27 , Issue 4 , December 2011 , pp. 53 - 57
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, R. 2005. Penguin Writers' Guides: How to Write Better English. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Anon, . 1826. The Vulgarities of Speech Corrected. London: Printed for James Bulcock.Google Scholar
Bryson, B. 2002. Troublesome Words. 3rd ed.London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Campbell, G. 1776. The Philosophy of Rhetoric. London: Printed for W. Strahan.Google Scholar
Evans, H. 2000. Essential English for Journalists, Editors and Writers. 2nd revised ed.London: Pimlico.Google Scholar
Gould, E. S. 1880. Good English, or, Popular Errors in Language. Revised ed.New York: A. C. Armstrong & Son.Google Scholar
Gowers, E. 1948. Plain Words: A Guide to the Use of English. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Herbert, A. P. 1935. What a Word! London: Methuen & Co.Google Scholar
Hong Kong Polytechnic University. 2002. ‘English for Academic Purposes.’ October 3. Online at <http://www2.elc.polyu.edu.hk/CILL/eap/book/default.htm> (Accessed May 1, 2011).+(Accessed+May+1,+2011).>Google Scholar
Horwill, H. W. 1936. ‘American variations.’ Society for Pure English Tract XLV. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Humphrys, J. 2004. Lost for Words: The Mangling and Manipulating of the English Language. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. 1928. Monosyllabism in English. London: Humphrey Milford.Google Scholar
Kennedy, A. G. 1920. The Modern English Verb-Adverb Combination. Stanford: Stanford University.Google Scholar
Kennedy, A. G. 1933. ‘The future of the English language.’ American Speech, 8(4), 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, A. (ed.) 1996. A Dictionary of the English Language on CD-ROM. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Orwell, G. 1946. ‘Politics and the English language.’ Online at <http://www.george-orwell.org/Politics_and_the_English_Language/0.html> (Accessed May 1, 2011).+(Accessed+May+1,+2011).>Google Scholar
Parminter, G. H. 1856. Materials for a Grammar of the Modern English Language. Cambridge: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
Partridge, E. 1947. Usage and Abusage: A Guide to Good English. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
Plain English Campaign. 2001. ‘The A-Z of alternative words.’ Online at <http://www.plainenglish.co.uk/files/alternative.pdf> (Accessed May 1, 2011).+(Accessed+May+1,+2011).>Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A. (ed.) 2000. The Oxford English Dictionary. Online edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Online at <http://www.oed.com> (Accessed May 1, 2011).+(Accessed+May+1,+2011).>Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. 2004. Collins Cobuild English Usage. 2nd ed.Glasgow: Collins.Google Scholar
Smith, L. P. 1923. ‘English idioms.’ Society for Pure English Tract XII. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
The Times Digital Archive. 1785–1985. Gale Group. Online at <http://infotrac.galegroup.com/itw/infomark> (Accessed May 1, 2011).+(Accessed+May+1,+2011).>Google Scholar
University of Chicago Press Staff. 2003. The Chicago Manual of Style. 15th ed.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Webster, N. 1828. An American Dictionary of the English Language. Online at <http://1828.mshaffer.com/> (Accessed May 1, 2011).+(Accessed+May+1,+2011).>Google Scholar
White, R. G. 1870. Words and their Uses, Past and Present: A Study of the English Language. New York: Sheldon and Company.Google Scholar