Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T10:22:27.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ah-prefacing in Kiswahili second pair parts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2011

Sigurd D'Hondt
Sigurd D'Hondt
Affiliation:
Ghent University, Department of African Languages and Cultures, Rozier 44, B-9000 Ghent, BelgiumSigurd.Dhondt@UGent.be
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article presents a conversation-analytic account of the various usages of the Kiswahili particle ah as it is routinely employed in naturally occurring Kiswahili conversation. Adopting a strategy reminiscent of the one Heritage and others adopted for English oh, it is argued that the seemingly disparate uses of this “language-specific object” represent various context-specific particularizations of a single semantic core. The basic claim is that ah constitutes a response cry that indexes to the other interlocutors the speaker's negative evaluative stance toward a particular issue. In this capacity, it frequently occupies the turn-initial position of a second pair part. Depending on the specifics of the sequential environment, the “object” of the indexed stance is traceable to either the particular item that is being talked about or the action performed in the preceding first. In the former case, the particle is used to demonstrate the speaker's affiliation with the previous speaker. In the latter case, it is used to demonstrate his disaffiliation with the previous speaker. (Kiswahili, particle, stance, second pair parts, turn-initial position, conversation analysis, comparative perspective)*

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 40 , Issue 5 , November 2011 , pp. 563 - 590
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blommaert, Jan (2005). Situating language rights: English and Swahili in Tanzania revisited. Journal of Sociolinguistics 9:390–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolden, Galina B. (2006). Little words that matter: Discourse-markers ‘so’ and ‘oh’ and the doing of other-attentiveness in social interaction. Journal of Communication 56:661–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, Andrew (2005). African underclass: Urbanisation, crime and colonial order in Dar es Salaam. Nairobi: The British Institute in Eastern Africa; Oxford: James Currey; Dar es Salaam: Mkuki na Nyota; Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
D'hondt, Sigurd (1998). Institutionalized identities in informal Kiswahili speech: Analysis of a dispute between two adolescents. Afrikanistische Arbeitspapiere 55:115–28.Google Scholar
D'hondt, Sigurd (2012). Refering to Islam in mutual teasing: Notes on an encounter between two Tanzanian revivalists. In Pinto, Paulo, Dupret, Baudouin, Pierret, Thomas, & Spellman-Poots, Kathryn (eds.), Ethnographies of Islam: Performances and interactions in Muslim contexts. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, to appear.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul (1984). Speakers' reporting in invitation sequences. In Maxwell Atkinson, J. & Heritage, John (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, 129–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul (1987). Po-faced receipts of teases. Linguistics 25:219–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro (1997). Linguistic anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Englert, Birgit (2008). Kuchanganyachanganya: Topic and language choices in Tanzanian youth culture. Journal of African Cultural Studies 20:45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Barbara A.; Hayashi;, Makoto & Jasperson, Robert (1996). Resources and repair: A cross-linguistic study of the syntactic organization of repair. In Ochs, Elinor, Schegloff, Emanuel A., & Thompson, Sandra A. (eds.), Interaction and grammar, 185–237. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1978). Response cries. Language 54:787–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In Maxwell Atkinson, J. & Heritage, John (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, John (1998). Oh-prefaced responses to inquiry. Language in Society 27:291–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John (2002a). Oh-prefaced responses to assessments: A method of modifying agreement/disagreement. In Ford, Cecila E., Fox, Barbara A., & Thompson, Sandra A. (eds.), The language of turn and sequence, 196–224. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John (2002b). The limits of questioning: Negative interrogatives and hostile question content. Journal of Pragmatics 34:1427–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, & Raymond, Geoffrey (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 68:15–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koshik, Irene (2002). A conversation-analytic study of yes/no questions which convey reversed polarity assertions. Journal of Pragmatics 34:1851–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, & Fanshell, David (1977). Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. (2005). Living with Manny's dangerous idea. Discourse Studies 7:431–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Local, John (1996). Conversational phonetics: Some aspects of news receipts in everyday talk. In Couper-Kuhlen, Elisabeth & Selting, Margaret (eds.), Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies, 177–230. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madumulla, Joshua; Bertoncini;, Elena & Blommaert, Jan (1999). Politics, ideology and poetic form: The literary debate in Tanzania. In Blommaert, Jan (ed.), Language ideological debates, 307–41. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meeuwis, Michael (1994). Leniency and testiness in intercultural communication: Remarks on ideology and context in intercultural sociolinguistics. Pragmatics 4:391–408.Google Scholar
Middleton, John (1992). The world of the Swahili: An African mercantile civilization. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Moerman, Michael (1988). Talking culture: Ethnography and conversational analysis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulokozi, Magyabuso (1991). English versus Kiswahili in Tanzania's secondary education. In Blommaert, Jan (ed.), Swahili studies: Essays in honour of Marcel Van Spaandonck, 7–16. Ghent: Academia Press.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita (1978). Compliment responses: Notes on the cooperation of multiple constraints. In Schenkein, Jim N. (ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction, 79–112. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita (1980). Telling my side: ‘Limited access’ as a fishing device. Sociological Inquiry 50:186–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In Maxwell Atkinson, J. & Heritage, John (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pope, E. (1973). Question-answering systems. Proceedings of Chicago Linguistics Society, 482–92. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey (2003). Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review 68:939–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuster-Jahn, Uta, & Kiessling, Roland (2006). Lugha ya mitaani in Tanzania: The poetics and sociology of a young urban style of speaking, with a dictionary comprising 1,100 words and phrases. Special issue of Swahili Forum 13. Mainz: Institut für Ethnologie und Afrikastudien.Google Scholar
Rubagumya, Casmir M. (ed.) (1994). Teaching and researching language in the African classroom. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis, vol 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidnell, Jack (2008). Alternate and complementary perspectives on language and social life: The organization of repair in two Caribbean communities. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12:477–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidnell, Jack (2009a). Comparative perspectives in conversation analysis. In Sidnell, Jack (ed.), 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidnell, Jack (ed.) (2009b). Conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena (2001). Responding in conversation: A study of response particles in Finnish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya (2008). Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41:31–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terasaki, Alene (2004). Pre-announcement sequences in conversation. In Lerner, Gene H. (ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation, 174–223. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Turner, Simon (2009). These young men show no respect for local customs: Globalisation and Islamic revival in Zanzibar. Journal of Religion in Africa 39:237–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Brad (2002). Thug realism: Inhabiting fantasy in urban Tanzania. Cultural Anthropology 17:93–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004). Stance in talk: A conversation analysis of Mandarin particles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yahya-Othman, Saida (1997). Language and power in Tanzania. Duisburg: LICCAP.Google Scholar