We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 October 2011
Europe's numerous fiscal crises – 2003 Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) crisis, its subsequent 2005 reforms, and the recent sovereign debt woes – draw attention to a shift in the management of EMU; namely the inclusion of more uncertainty-based governance. Understood as modalities of government, risk, and uncertainty make the production of this fiscal-monetary space intelligible as a recognised form of knowledge and object of government. Whereas the Pact was devised as the anchor for EMU, it has come to symbolise its weakness. This article argues that the result is an antagonistic relationship between the programmatic and operational dimensions of fiscal governance; otherwise seen as a dialectic between the two competing domains of expertise/law and politics. Starting with the 2005 SGP reforms, and exacerbated by the credit crisis, uncertainty has been mobilised to justify alternative forms of managing fiscal conduct linked to new strategies of calculation and issues of responsibility. Bound to variegated notions of ‘fiscal normality’, I contend that the 2005 reforms signal the (re)politicisation of the budgetary framework and the reconfiguration of the politics of limits. Rather than marginalising informal judgment, the government through uncertainty places a greater emphasis on creative entrepreneurialism in fostering compliance in ways risk does not.
1 Differentiated medium-term budgetary objectives have replaced the ‘close-to-balance or in surplus’ requirement, which states did not respect, in order to account for heterogeneous economic developments and fiscal uncertainty. The reference values of 3 per cent deficit to GDP and 60 per cent debt to GDP were retained.
2 Arestis, Philip and Sawyer, Malcolm, ‘Macroeconomic Policy and the European Constitution’, in Arestis, Philip and Sawyer, Malcolm (eds), Alternative Perspectives on Economic Policies in the EU (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2006), p. 57CrossRefGoogle Scholar .
3 Heipertz, Martin and Verdun, Amy, ‘The Dog that Would Never Bite? What We Can Learn From the Origins of the Stability and Growth Pact’, Journal of European Public Policy, 11:5 (2004), p. 770CrossRefGoogle Scholar .
4 O'Malley, Pat, ‘Uncertain Subjects: Risks, Liberalism and Contract’, Economy and Society, 29:4 (2000), p. 478CrossRefGoogle Scholar .
5 A pro-cyclical bias deteriorated state finances and was compounded by the differential treatment of Member States.
6 German politics of fiscal austerity are embedded in its cultural memory of 1920s hyperinflation and the prominent role of the Bundesbank in steering both economic and monetary policy.
7 Savage, James D. and Verdun, Amy, ‘Reforming Europe's Stability and Growth Pact: Lessons from the American Experience in Macrobudgeting’, Review of International Political Economy, 14:5 (2007), p. 843CrossRefGoogle Scholar .
8 Dyson, Kenneth, ‘Germany: A Crisis in Leadership in the Euro Area’, in Dyson, Kenneth (ed.), The Euro at 10: Europeanization, Power, and Convergence (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), p. 151Google Scholar .
9 Begg, Iain and Schelkle, Waltraud, ‘The Pact is Dead: Long Live the Pact’, National Economic Institute, 189 (2004), p. 86CrossRefGoogle Scholar .
10 Heipertz and Verdun, ‘The Dog that Would Never Bite? What We Can Learn From the Origins of the Stability and Growth Pact’, p. 770.
11 Council of the EU, Improving the Implementation of the Stability and Growth Pact, Report to the European Council, 7423/05 (Brussels, 2005).
12 Ibid.
13 Council of the EU, Improving the Implementation of the Stability and Growth Pact.
14 A clarified division of labour distinguishes assessment, by granting the Commission the ‘right to bark’, from decision-making, or the ‘right to bite’, which still falls exclusively into the province of the Council.
15 Crowley, Patrick, ‘The Shape of Things to Come: The EU's Post-EMU Institutional Architecture’, in Verdun, Amy (ed.), The Euro: European Integration Theory and Economic and Monetary Union (Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2002), p. 166Google Scholar .
16 European Commission: DG for Economic and Financial Affairs, European Economy: Public Finances in EMU 2006 (Brussels: DG EcFin, 2006), p. 107Google Scholar .
17 Cafruny, Alan W. and Ryner, Magnus, Europe at Bay: In the Shadow of US Hegemony (Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 2007)Google Scholar .
18 Winkler, Bernard, ‘Stability and Growth: The Role of Monetary Policy and Other Policy Actors in EMU’, in Torres, Francisco, Verdun, Amy, Zimmermann, Hubert (eds), EMU Rules: The Political and Economic Consequences of European Monetary Integration (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2006)Google Scholar .
19 Philip Arestis and Malcolm Sawyer, ‘Macroeconomic Policy and the European Constitution’, p. 20.
20 Marco Buti, ‘Will the New Stability and Growth Pact Succeed? An Economic and Political Perspective’ (January 2006), available at: {http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/publication841_en.pdf} accessed 9 January 2006.
21 Haahr, Jens H., ‘Open Coordination as Advanced Liberal Government’, Journal of European Public Policy, 11:2 (2004), p. 209CrossRefGoogle Scholar .
22 Foucault, Michel, ‘Governmentality’, in Burchell, Graham, Gordon, Colin and Miller, Peter (eds), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991), pp. 87–104Google Scholar ; Dean, Mitchell, Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society (New York: Sage, 1999)Google Scholar ; Goede, Marieke de, Virtue, Fortune, and Faith: A Genealogy of Finance (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2005)Google Scholar .
23 O'Malley, Pat, Risk, Uncertainty and Government (Portland: The Glasshouse Press, 2004)Google Scholar .
24 Goede, Marieke de, ‘Beyond Economism in International Political Economy’, Review of International Studies, 29 (2003), pp. 79–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar .
25 Foucault, Michel, ‘Questions of Method’, in Burchell, Graham, Gordon, Colin and Miller, Peter (eds), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991), p. 76Google Scholar , emphasis in original.
26 Miller, Peter and Rose, Nikolas, ‘Governing Economic Life’, Economy and Society, 19:1 (1990), p. 8CrossRefGoogle Scholar .
27 O'Malley, Pat, Risk, Uncertainty and Government, p. 15Google Scholar ; Determining the tangibility of a specific threat is not the intention. Whether or not objective knowledge is acquired as a capacity for future behaviour is of little concern because risk and uncertainty are neither analytically real nor unreal. Given their permanent state of virtuality, ontological questions are rendered peripheral. Instead, attention is devoted to understanding how the governmental rationalities underpinning EMU are framed and articulated in these terms.
28 O'Malley, Pat, Risk, Uncertainty and Government, p. 27Google Scholar .
29 Beck, Ulrich, Risk Society (London: Polity Press, 1992)Google Scholar ; Reddy, Sanjay, ‘Claims to Expert Knowledge and the Subversion of Democracy: The Triumph of Risk over Uncertainty’, Economy and Society, 25:2 (1996), pp. 222–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar .
30 Weir, Lorna, ‘Recent Developments in the Government of Pregnancy’, Economy and Society, 25:3 (1996), p. 383CrossRefGoogle Scholar .
31 O'Malley, Pat, Risk, Uncertainty and Government, p. 5Google Scholar .
32 Dean, Mitchell, ‘Putting the Technological Into Government’, History of the Human Science, 9 (1996), p. 56Google Scholar .
33 Chorafas, Dimitris N., Risk Management Technology in Financial Services (New York: Elsevier, 2007), p. 24CrossRefGoogle Scholar .
34 Kessler, Oliver, ‘The Same as It Never Was? Uncertainty and the Changing Contours of International Law’, Review of International StudiesGoogle Scholar , this Special Section.
35 MacKenzie, Donald, ‘Long-Term Capital Management and the Sociology of Arbitrage’, Economy and Society, 32:2 (2003), pp. 349–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar .
36 Walters, William and Henrik Haahr, Jens, Governing Europe: Discourse, Governmentality and European Integration (New York: Routledge, 2005)Google Scholar .
37 Power, Michael, The Risk Management of Everything (London: Demos, 2004)Google Scholar .
38 Power, Michael, Organized Uncertainty: Designing a World of Risk Management (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007), p. 35Google Scholar .
39 Power, Michael, The Risk Management of Everything, p. 24Google Scholar .
40 Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, ‘Operation Risk Management’, available at: {http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs42.pdf?noframes=1}. Examples of external factors would include market price movements or a change in a borrower's condition.
41 Oliver Kessler, ‘The Same as It Never Was? Uncertainty and the Changing Contours of International Law’.
42 Kenneth Dyson, ‘Germany: A Crisis in Leadership in the Euro Area’, pp. 150–2.
43 MacLeod, Michael R., ‘Financial Actors and Instruments in the Construction of Global Corporate Social Responsibility’, in Ebrahim, Alnoor and Weisband, Edward (eds), Global Accountabilities: Participation, Pluralism, and Public Ethics (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007), p. 246Google Scholar .
44 Interestingly, market confidence in the long-run sustainability of debt obligations appears to have mitigated the risk of higher premiums. Yield spreads on government bonds did not react in any significant direction to the November 2003 crisis. Virtually identical, 10-year government bond rates were 3.72 per cent in France, 3.71 per cent in Germany, and 3.88 per cent in Italy. Conversely, Spain's maintenance of a low deficit (1.1 per cent) went unrewarded. That kind of assurance, however, is socially constructed and often volatile, which makes reputation potentially unmanageable through strict risk calculations.
45 O'Malley, Pat, Risk, Uncertainty and Government, p. 13Google Scholar .
46 Arrow, Kenneth J. and Debreu, Gerald, ‘Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy’, Econometrica, 22 (1954), pp. 225–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Malinvaud, Edmond, ‘First Order Certainty Equivalence’, Econometrica, 37:4 (1969), pp. 706–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar .
47 Knight, Frank, Risk, Uncertainty and Profit (New York: A. M. Kelley, 1921/1964), p. 197Google Scholar .
48 Ibid., p. 227.
49 Denzau, Arthur T. and North, Douglass C., ‘Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions’, Kyklos, 47:1 (1994), pp. 3–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar . Interests are ideationally-bound rather than pre-given immutable facts. Denzau and North address this point but their contribution is mainly limited to the realm of ideas.Aside from some marginal comments about institutions, however, Denzau and North fail to adequately explicate how these mental constructions are actually translated into practice. By neglecting the materiality of discourse while privileging ideas in the construction of social structures rather than explaining how they are produced and renegotiated, Denzau and North are prone to idealism.
50 Maynard Keynes, John, ‘Theory of Employment’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 51:2 (1937), p. 214Google Scholar .
51 Beck, Ulrich, Giddens, Anthony and Lash, Scott, Reflexive Modernization (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1994)Google Scholar ; Beck, Ulrich, World Risk Society (London: Polity, 1999)Google Scholar .
52 Beckert, Jens, Beyond the Market: The Social Foundations of Economic Efficiency (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002), p. 42Google Scholar .
53 Tabellini, Guido, ‘Money, Debt and Deficits in a Dynamic Game’, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 10 (1986), pp. 227–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Putnam, Robert, ‘Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-level Games’, International Organization, 42:3 (1988), pp. 427–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Moravcsik, Andrew, The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1998)Google Scholar .
54 Buti, Marco and Pench, Lucio R., ‘Why Do Large Countries Flout the Stability Pact? And What Can Be Done About It?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 42 (2004), p. 1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar .
55 Darryl S. L. Jarvis and Martin Griffiths, ‘Risk and International Relations: A New Research Agenda?’, p. 17.
56 Blyth, Mark, ‘When Liberalisms Change: Comparing the Politics of Deflations and Inflations’, in Roy, Ravi K., Denzau, Arthur T. and Willett, Thomas D. (eds), Neoliberalism: National and Regional Experiments with Global Ideas (New York: Routledge, 2007), p. 78Google Scholar .
57 Hacking, Ian, The Taming of Chance (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990), p. viiCrossRefGoogle Scholar .
58 Aalberts, Tanja E. and Werner, Wouter G., ‘Mobilising Uncertainty and the Making of Responsible Sovereigns,’ Review of International StudiesGoogle Scholar , this Special Section.
59 Dyson, Kenneth, ‘The First Decade’, in Dyson, Kenneth (ed.), The Euro at 10: Europeanization, Power, and Convergence (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), p. 24Google Scholar .
60 Council of the EU, Brussels Spring European Council: Presidency Conclusions, 22 and 23 March 2005, 7619/1/05, REV 1, CONCL 1 (Brussels, 2005), p. 26.
61 Council of the EU, Code of Conduct (Specifications on the implementation of the Stability and Growth Pact and guidelines on the format and content of stability and convergence programmes; endorsed by the ECOFIN Council on 11 October 2005).
62 European Commission: DG for Economic and Financial Affairs, European Economy: Public Finances in EMU 2007 (Brussels: DG EcFin, 2007), p. 74Google Scholar .
63 European Commission: DG for Economic and Financial Affairs, Reinforcing Economic Policy Coordination: Communication COM(2010)250 final (Brussels: DG EcFin, 2010), p. 8Google Scholar .
64 Hallerberg, Mark and Bridwell, Joshua, ‘Fiscal Policy Coordination and Discipline: The Stability and Growth Pact and Domestic Fiscal Regimes’, in Dyson, Kenneth (ed.), The Euro at 10: Europeanization, Power, and Convergence (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 69–86Google Scholar .
65 Blyth, Mark, Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Changes in the Twentieth Century (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002), p. 9CrossRefGoogle Scholar .
66 European Commission: DG for Economic and Financial Affairs, European Economy: Public Finances in EMU 2007, 74.
67 Council of the EU, Press Release, 2753th Council Meeting, Economic and Financial Committee, 10 October 2006,13600/06 (Presse 278) (Luxembourg, 2006), p. 16.
68 Axford, Barrie and Huggins, Richard, ‘Towards a Post-National Polity: The Emergence of the Network Society in Europe’, in Smith, Dennis and Wright, Sue (eds), Whose Europe? The Turn Towards Democracy (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999), pp. 121–147Google Scholar .
69 Aalberts, Tanja E. and Werner, Wouter G., ‘Mobilising Uncertainty and the Making of Responsible Sovereigns’, Review of International Studies, this Special Section, p. 15Google Scholar .
70 In fact, overzealous and dubious risk practices have contributed to this entire mess.
71 Beckert, Jens, Beyond the Market: The Social Foundations of Economic Efficiency, p. 40Google Scholar .
72 Goede, Marieke de, ‘Introduction: International Political Economy and the Promises of Poststructuralism’, in Goede, Marieke de, (ed.), International Political Economy and Poststructural Politics (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006), p. 6CrossRefGoogle Scholar .
