Behavioral and Brain Sciences

Open Peer Commentary

Competence, reflective equilibrium, and dual-system theories

Wesley Buckwaltera1 and Stephen Sticha2

a1 Department of Philosophy, Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, NY 10016-4309. jbuckwalter@gc.cuny.edu https://wfs.gc.cuny.edu/JBuckwalter/index.html

a2 Department of Philosophy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901-1107. sstich@ruccs.rutgers.edu http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/~stich/

Abstract

A critique of inferences from “is” to “ought” plays a central role in Elqayam & Evans' (E&E's) defense of descriptivism. However, the reflective equilibrium strategy described by Goodman and embraced by Rawls, Cohen, and many others poses an important challenge to that critique. Dual-system theories may help respond to that challenge.

(Online publication October 14 2011)

Related Articles

    Subtracting “ought” from “is”: Descriptivism versus normativism in the study of human thinking Shira Elqayam and Jonathan St. B. T. Evans Division of Psychology, School of Applied Social Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, De Montfort University, The Gateway, Leicester, LE1 9BH, United Kingdom. selqayam@dmu.ac.uk http://www.psy.dmu.ac.uk/elqayam; School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, United Kingdom. jevans@plymouth.ac.uk http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/staff/jevans
    Related Content