Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T21:05:21.169Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Microvariation in object positions: Negative Shift in Scandinavian

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2011

Eva Engels
Eva Engels*
Affiliation:
Aarhus University, Department of Language, Literature and Culture, Jens Chr. Skous Vej 5, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark. eva.engels@hum.au.dk
Get access

Abstract

In the Scandinavian languages, sentential negation must be licensed in Spec–head relation in the IP-domain, necessitating leftward movement of negative objects, Negative Shift (NegS). While string-vacuous NegS is possible in all Scandinavian varieties, there is a fair amount of cross-linguistic variation in non-string-vacuous NegS. In particular, the varieties contrast in which constituents can be crossed by NegS and whether or not crossing of a certain constituent requires the presence of an intervening verb. The paper presents the complex variation as to the distribution of negative objects in Scandinavian, using data from different sources, and outlines an analysis within Fox & Pesetsky's (2003, 2005a, b) cyclic linearization model, which accounts for this variation by differences in the availability of the intermediate positions non-string-vacuous movement is forced to proceed through.

Keywords

cyclic linearizationNegative Shiftobject positionsScandinavian languages
Type
Research Article
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 34 , Special Issue 2: The Nordic Languages and Typology , October 2011 , pp. 133 - 155
Copyright
Copyright © Nordic Association of Linguistics 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allan, Robin & Barnes, Michael (eds.). 1987. The Seventh Biennial Conference of Teachers of Scandinavian Studies in Great Britain and Northern Ireland. London: Department of Scandinavian Studies, University College London.Google Scholar
Bergroth, Hugo. 1917. Finlandssvenska. Handledning till Undvikande av Provinsialismer i Tal och Skrift [Finland Swedish: A guide to avoiding provincialisms in speech and writing]. Helsinki: Holger Schildts Förlag.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries. In Martin, Roger, Michaels, David & Uriagereka, Juan (eds.), Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–156. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Kenstowicz, Michael (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Christensen, Ken Ramshøj. 2005. Interfaces: Negation – Syntax – Brain. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Aarhus.Google Scholar
Christensen, Ken Ramshøj. 2008. NEG-shift, licensing, and repair strategies. Studia Linguistica 62 (2), 182–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Kristi Koch. 1986. Norwegian ingen: A case of post-syntactic lexicalization. In Dahl, Östen & Holmberg, Anders (eds.), Scandinavian Syntax, 21–35. Stockholm: Institute of Linguistics, University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
Christensen, Kristi Koch. 1987. Modern Norwegian ingen and the ghost of an Old Norse particle. In Allan & Barnes (eds.), 1–17.Google Scholar
Christensen, Kristi Koch & Taraldsen, Knut Tarald. 1989. Expletive chain formation and past participle agreement in Scandinavian dialects. In Benincà, Paola (ed.), Dialect Variation and the Theory of Grammar, 53–83. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engels, Eva. 2009. Preposition stranding versus pied-piping: Negative Shift of prepositional complements in dialects of Faroese. In Svenonius, Peter, Bentzen, Kristine, Heycock, Caroline, Jacobsen, Jógvan í Lon, Johannessen, Jannne Bondi, Parrott, Jeffrey K., Strahan, Tania E. & Vangsnes, Øystein A. (eds.), Nordlyd 36.2: NORMS Papers on Faroese, 186–207. Tromsø: University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
Engels, Eva. 2011. Scandinavian negative indefinites and cyclic linearization. Syntax. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9612.2011.00161.x. Published by Wiley Blackwell, 2 August 2011.Google Scholar
Faarlund, Jan Terje, Lie, Svein & Vannebo, Kjell Ivar. 1997. Norsk referansegrammatikk [Norwegian reference grammar]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Fox, Danny & Pesetsky, David. 2003. Cyclic linearization and the typology of movement. Ms., MIT.Google Scholar
Fox, Danny & Pesetsky, David. 2005a. Cyclic linearization of syntactic structure. Theoretical Linguistics 31 (1–2), 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Danny & Pesetsky, David. 2005b. Cyclic linearization and its interaction with other aspects of grammar: A reply. Theoretical Linguistics 31 (1–2), 235–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garbacz, Piotr. 2008. Negationens syntax i älvdalskan [The syntax of negation in Övdalian]. In Bukowski, Piotr, Pietrzak-Porwisz, Grażyna & Kowal, Iwona (eds.), Perspektiv på svenska språket och litteraturen [Perspectives on Swedish language and literature], 193–202. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskigo.Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2005. N-words and negative concord. In Everaert, Martin, van Riemsdijk, Henk, Goedemans, Rob & Hollebrandse, Bart (eds.), The Linguistics Companion, vol. 3, 327–391. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 1995. The Syntax of Negation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Zanuttini, Raffaella. 1991. Negative heads and the Neg Criterion. The Linguistic Review 8 (2/4), 233–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Zanuttini, Raffaella. 1996. Negative concord in West Flemish. In Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi (eds.), Parameters and Functional Heads, 117–179. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 1986. Word Order and Syntactic Features in the Scandinavian Languages and English. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 1999. Remarks on Holmberg's generalization. Studia Linguistica 53 (1), 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Philip & Hinchliffe, Ian. 2003. Swedish: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jónsson, Johannes Gísli. 1996. Clausal Architecture and Case in Icelandic. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 1987. OV word order in Icelandic. In Allan & Barnes (eds.), 33–49.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter. 2000. Quantifier movement in Icelandic. In Svenonius, Peter (ed.), The Derivation of VO and OV, 255–292. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svenonius, Peter. 2002. Strains of negation in Norwegian. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 69, 121–146.Google Scholar
Thelander, Mats. 1980. Någonting om bl.a. ingenting [Something about nothing among other things]. In Valter Jansson, Bengt Nordberg & Mats Thelander (eds.), Ord och struktur. Studier i nyare svenska tillägnade Gun Widmark den 31 juli 1980 [Word and structure: Studies in Modern Swedish, in honor of Gun Widmark, 31 July 1980], 323–341. Uppsala: Lundequistska bokhandeln.Google Scholar
Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2004. Sentential Negation and Negative Concord. Utrecht: LOT Publications.Google Scholar