Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-17T05:45:10.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Working with farmers to develop integrated tick management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

J. W. Ssennyonga
J. W. Ssennyonga
Affiliation:
The International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P.O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
Get access

Abstract

Paper discusses five substantive issues affecting farmer participation (FP) in the development of integrated tick management (ITM). These are the concepts, methods, incentives for and constraints to farmer participation (FP), and finally, case study material illustrating how FP has contributed to the research and development of integrated tick management.

Résumé

L'article discute cinq points affect ant la participation du paysan dans le développement de la lutte integrée contre les tiques. Cecisont des conceptes, méthodes, encouragement pour et des constraintes a la participation du paysan et finalement, l'étude illustrant comment la participation du paysan a contribue a la recherche développment de la lutte integrée contre les tiques.

Keywords

Farmer participationconceptsmethodsincentiveconstraints contributionintegrated tick management
Type
Biological Control, Natural Products and Social Science
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 13 , Special Issue 4: Status and Recent Advances in Tick Management in Africa , August 1992 , pp. 599 - 606
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ashby, J. A., Quiros, C. A. and Rivers, Y. M. (1989a) Farmer participation in technology development: work with crop varieties. In Farmer First: Farmer Innovation and Agricultural Research (Edited by Chambers, R., Pacey, A. and Thrupp, L. A.), pp. 115–122. Intermediate Technology Publications.Google Scholar
Ashby, J. A., Quiros, C. A. and Rivers, Y. M. (1989b) Experience with group techniques in Colombia. In Farmer First: Farmer Innovation and Agricultural Research (Edited by Chambers, R., Pacey, A. and Thrupp, L. A.), pp. 127–132. Intermediate Technology Publications.Google Scholar
Baker, G., Knipscheer, H. and Neto, J. (1988) The impact of regular research field hearings (RRFH). In On-Farm Trials in North-East Brazil. Experimental Agriculture. Vol. 24. pp. 281–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, R., Pacey, A. and Thrupp, L. A. (editors) (1989) Farmer First: Farmer Innovations and Agricultural Research. Intermediate Technology Publications, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrington, J. and Martin, A. (1988) Farmer participation in agricultural research. In A Review of Concepts and Practices. Agricultural Administration Unit. Overseas Development Institute. Occasional Paper 9. London.Google Scholar
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE) (1989) Annual Report pp. 36–37.Google Scholar
Johnson, A. W. (1972) Individuality and experimentation in traditional agriculture. Human Ecology 1, 448–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kean, S. A. (1988) Developing a partnership between fanners and scientists: The example of Zambia's adaptive research planning team. Experimental Agriculture Vol. 24, Overseas Development Institute, London, pp. 289–299.Google Scholar
Mathias-Mundy, E. and McCorckle, C. (1992) Ethnoveterinary medicine: An annotated bibliography. In Bibliographies in Technology and Social Change Programme. Iowa State University. Ames, Iowa (in press).Google Scholar
Mathias-Mundy, E. (1989a) Of herbs and healers. In Information Center for Low External Input. Agriculture Newsletter. October. Leusden, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Mathias-Mundy, E. (1989b) Ethnoveterinary medicine: An annotated bibliography. Creative Component, Iowa State University.Google Scholar
Matlon, P., Cantrell, R., King, D. and Benoit Cattin, M. (editors) (1984) Coming Full Circle, Farmers Participation in the Development of Technology. International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
McCorkle, C. M. (1989) Veterinary anthropology. Human Organisation 48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mclntire, J. (1984) Survey costs and rural economics research. In Coming Full Circle, Farmers’ Participation in the Development of Technology. (Edited by Matlon, P., Cantrell, R., King, D. and Benoit-Cattin, M.). International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
McPherson, H., and McGarry, M. G. (1987) User participation and implementation strategies in water and sanitation projects. Int. J. Water Res. Dev. 3, 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raman, K. V. (1989) Scientists training and interactions with fanners in India. In Farmer First: Farmer Innovation and Agricultural Research (Edited by Chambers, R., Pacey, A. and Thrupp, L. A.), pp. 169–175. Intermediate Technology Publications.Google Scholar
Rhoades, R. E. and Booth, R. H. (1982) Farmer-back-to-farmer: A model for generating acceptable agricultural technology. Agric. Adm. 11, 127–137.Google Scholar
Ssennyonga, J. W. (1992a) The implication of a community-based approach to the development of IPM Technologies. Insect Sci. Applic. (In press).Google Scholar
Ssennyonga, J. W. (1992b) Farmers’ knowledge and control of vectors of diseases of domestic animals. In Popular Perceptions of Pests and Vectors of Diseases of Domestic Animals (Edited by Prah, K.), (in press). ICIPE Science Press, Nairobi.Google Scholar
Sumberg, J. and Okali, C. (1989) Farmers on-farm research and new technology. In Farmer First: Farmer Innovation and Agricultural Research (Edited by Chambers, R., Pacey, A. and Thrupp, L. A.), pp. 109–114. Intermediate Technology Publications.Google Scholar
Tatchell, R. J., Chimwani, D., Chirchir, S. J., Ong'are, J. O., Mwangi, E., Rinkanya, F. and Whittington, D. (1986) A study of the justification for intensive tick control in Kenyan rangelands. In The Veterinary Record. October 1986 pp. 401–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whyte, W. F. (1981) Participatory Approaches to Agricultural Research and Development: A State-of-the-Art-Paper. Rural Development Committee, Centre for International Studies, Cornell University, USA. p. 111.Google Scholar