Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T07:10:10.650Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Alternative rearing systems in pigs: consequences on stress indicators at slaughter and meat quality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2011

A. Foury ,
B. Lebret ,
P. Chevillon ,
A. Vautier ,
C. Terlouw  and
P. Mormède
A. Foury
Affiliation:
PsyNuGen, Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, UMR 1286 INRA, F-33076 Bordeaux, France
B. Lebret
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1079 Systèmes d'Elevage Nutrition Animale et Humaine, F-35590 Saint-Gilles, France
P. Chevillon
Affiliation:
Pôle Génétique, IFIP Institut du Porc, F-35651 Le Rheu cedex, France
A. Vautier
Affiliation:
Pôle Génétique, IFIP Institut du Porc, F-35651 Le Rheu cedex, France
C. Terlouw
Affiliation:
INRA, UR 1213 Unité de Recherches sur les Herbivores, F-63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France
P. Mormède*
Affiliation:
PsyNuGen, Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, UMR 1286 INRA, F-33076 Bordeaux, France
Get access

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of three alternative (ALT) rearing systems for growing pigs (outdoor: 150 m2/pig; straw bedding: 1.30 m2/pig; and hut with access to a courtyard: 1.30 m2/pig) compared with a conventional system (fully slatted floor: 0.65 m2/pig, considered as control), on pre-slaughter stress indicators in relation with meat quality. To that end, the number of skin lesions on whole carcasses, as well as blood creatine kinase (CK) activity and urine levels in cortisol and catecholamines (adrenaline and noradrenaline) were determined at slaughter. Glycolytic potential (GP) and ultimate pH of the semimembranosus muscle were also measured. The global correlation network calculated between all these parameters shows that the indicators of pre-slaughter muscle activity (plasma CK) and/or stress indicators (e.g. adrenaline) are negatively (r = −0.26, P < 0.01; r = −0.29, P < 0.05, respectively) correlated with muscle GP and positively (r = 0.17, P < 0.05; r = 0.44, P < 0.001, respectively) with meat ultimate pH. Although some traits measured were sensitive to the degree of pre-slaughter mixing, they differed across rearing systems. The differences were most pronounced for the comparison of outdoors v. slatted floor. The lower levels of plasma CK and urinary catecholamines, and the lower number of carcass skin lesions of pigs reared outdoors, were related to a lower meat ultimate pH. Thus, ALT rearing systems influence animal welfare and meat quality, by providing enriched environmental conditions to the animals.

Keywords

rearing systemstressmeat qualitypigs
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 5 , Issue 10 , 26 August 2011 , pp. 1620 - 1625
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barton Gade, P 2008a. Effect of rearing system and mixing at loading on transport and lairage behaviour and meat quality: comparison of outdoor and conventionally raised pigs. Animal 2, 902–911.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barton Gade, P 2008b. Effect of rearing system and mixing at loading on transport and lairage behaviour and meat quality: comparison of free range and conventionally raised pigs. Animal 2, 1238–1246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barton Gade, P, Warris, PD, Brown, SN, Lambooij, B 1996. Methods of improving pig welfare and meat quality by reducing stress and discomfort before slaughter-Methods of assessing Meat Quality. In Proceeding of the EU-Seminar “New information on Welfare and meat quality of pigs as related to handling, transport and lairage conditions” (ed. A Schuette), p. 23–36. Braunschweig-Voelkenrode, Germany.Google Scholar
Bonneau, M, Lebret, B 2010. Production systems and influence on eating quality of pork. Meat Science 84, 293–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bornstein, SR, Engeland, WC, Ehrhart-Bornstein, M, Herman, JP 2008. Dissociation of ACTH and glucocorticoids. Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism 19, 175–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciaranello, RD 1978. Regulation of phenylethanolamine N-methyltransferase. Biochemical Pharmacology 27, 1895–1897.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crockett, CM, Bowers, CL, Sackett, GP, Bowden, DM 1993. Urinary cortisol responses of longtailed macaques to 5 cage sizes, tethering, sedation, and room change. American Journal of Primatology 30, 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Eath, RB, Turner, SP, Kurt, E, Evans, G, Tholking, L, Looft, H, Wimmers, K, Murani, E, Klont, R, Foury, A, Ison, SH, Lawrence, AB, Mormede, P 2010. Pigs’ aggressive temperament affects pre-slaughter mixing aggression, stress and meat quality. Animal 4, 604–616.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Jong, IC, Prelle, I, Burgwal, J, Lambooij, E, Korte, S, Blokhuis, H, Koolhaas, J 2000. Effects of environmental enrichment on behavioral responses to novelty, learning, and memory, and the circadian rhythm in cortisol in growing pigs. Physiology & Behavior 68, 571–578.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Jong, IC, Ekkel, ED, Van de Burgwal, JA, Lambooij, E, Korte, SM, Ruis, MAW, Koolhaas, JM, Blokhuis, HJ 1998. Effects of strawbedding on physiological responses to stressors and behavior in growing pigs. Physiology & Behavior 64, 303–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dransfield, E, Ngapo, TM, Nielsen, NA, Bredahl, L, Sjoden, PO, Magnusson, M, Campo, MM, Nute, GR 2005. Consumer choice and suggested price for pork as influenced by its appearance, taste and information concerning country of origin and organic pig production. Meat Science 69, 61–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, SA 2005. Product quality attributes associated with outdoor pig production. Livestock Production Science 94, 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, AV, Jones, CT 1993. Autonomic control of adrenal-function. Journal of Anatomy 183, 291–307.Google ScholarPubMed
Eurobarometer 2007. Attitudes of EU citizens towards animal welfare. Special Eurobarometer 270/Wave 66.1, TNS Opinion & Social (http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_270_en.pdf).Google Scholar
Enfalt, AC, Lundstrom, K, Hansson, I, Lundeheim, N, Nystrom, PE 1997. Effects of outdoor rearing and sire breed (Duroc or Yorkshire) on carcass composition and sensory and technological meat quality. Meat Science 45, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernandez, X, Tornberg, E 1991. A review of the causes of variation in muscle glycogen content and ultimate pH in pigs. Journal of Muscle Foods 2, 209–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foury, A, Devillers, N, Sanchez, MP, Griffon, H, Le Roy, P, Mormède, P 2005. Stress hormones, carcass composition and meat quality in Large White x Duroc pigs. Meat Science 69, 703–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foury, A, Geverink, N, Gil, M, Gispert, M, Hortos, M, Furnols, M, Carrion, D, Blott, S, Plastow, G, Mormède, P 2007. Stress neuroendocrine profiles in five pig breeding lines and the relationship with carcass composition. Animal 1, 973–982.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fuji, J, Otsu, K, Zorzato, F, De Leon, S, Khanna, VK, Weiler, JE, O'Brien, PJ, MacLennan, DH 1991. Identification of a mutation in porcine ryanodine receptor associated with malignant hyperthermia. Science 253, 448–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentry, JG, McGlone, JJ, JrBlanton, JR, Miller, MF 2002. Alternative housing systems for pigs: influences on growth, composition, and pork quality. Journal of Animal Science 80, 1781–1790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geverink, NA, De Jong, IC, Lambooij, E, Blokhuis, HJ, Wiegant, VM 1999. Influence of housing conditions on responses of pigs to preslaughter treatment and consequences for meat quality. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 79, 285–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geverink, NA, Foury, A, Plastow, GS, Gil, M, Gispert, M, Hortos, M, Furnols, M, Gort, G, Moisan, MP, Mormède, P 2006. Cortisol-binding globulin and meat quality in five European lines of pigs. Journal of Animal Science 84, 204–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gispert, M, Faucitano, L, Oliver, MA, Guardia, MD, Coll, C, Siggens, K, Harvey, K, Diestre, A 2000. A survey of pre-slaughter conditions, halothane gene frequency, and carcass and meat quality in five Spanish pig commercial abattoirs. Meat Science 55, 97–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hambrecht, E, Eissen, JJ, Verstegen, MWA 2003. Effect of processing plant on pork quality. Meat Science 64, 125–131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hay, M, Mormède, P 1997a. Improved determination of urinary cortisol and cortisone, or corticosterone and 11-dehydrocorticosterone by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet absorbance detection. Journal of Chromatography B 702, 33–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hay, M, Mormède, P 1997b. Determination of catecholamines and methoxycatecholamines excretion patterns in pig and rat urine by ion-exchange liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection. Journal of Chromatography B 703, 15–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klont, RE, Hulsegge, B, Hoving-Bolink, AH, Gerritzen, MA, Kurt, E, Winkelman-Goedhart, HA, De Jong, IC, Kranen, RW 2001. Relationships between behavioral and meat quality characteristics of pigs raised under barren and enriched housing conditions. Journal of Animal Science 79, 2835–2843.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Korte, SM, Bouws, GAH, Bohus, B 1992. Adrenal hormones in rats before and after stress-experience: effects of ipsapirone. Physiology & Behavior 51, 1129–1133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lebret, B 2008. Effects of feeding systems on growth, carcass composition and meat quality in pigs. Animal 2, 1548–1558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lebret, B, Massabie, P, Granier, R, Juin, H, Mourot, J, Chevillon, P 2002. Influence of outdoor rearing and indoor temperature on growth performance, carcass, adipose tissue and muscle traits in pigs, and on the technological and eating quality of dry-cured hams. Meat Science 62, 447–455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lebret, B, Meunier-Salaun, MC, Foury, A, Mormède, P, Dransfield, E, Dourmad, JY 2006. Influence of rearing conditions on performance, behavioral, and physiological responses of pigs to preslaughter handling, carcass traits, and meat quality. Journal of Animal Science 84, 2436–2447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lebret, B, Prunier, A, Bonhomme, N, Foury, A, Mormède, P, Dourmad, JY 2011. Physiological traits and meat quality of pigs as affected by genotype, housing system. Meat Science 88, 14–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monin, G 2003. Abattage des porcs et qualités des carcasses et des viandes. Productions Animales 16, 251–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monin, G, Sellier, P 1985. Pork of low technological quality with a normal rate of muscle pH fall in the immediate post-mortem period: the case of the Hampshire breed. Meat Science 13, 49–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sather, AP, Jones, SDM, Schaefer, AL, Colyn, J, Robertson, WM 1997. Feedlot performance, carcass composition and meat quality of free-range reared pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 77, 225–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheurink, AJW, Steffens, AB, Bouritius, H, Dreteler, GH, Bruntink, R, Remie, R, Zaagsma, J 1989. Adrenal and sympathetic catecholamines in exercising rats. American Journal of Physiology 256, R155–R160.Google ScholarPubMed
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute 2008. Statistics Version 9.2. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Terlouw, C 2005. Stress reactions at slaughter and meat quality in pigs: genetic background and prior experience: a brief review of recent findings. Livestock Production Science 94, 125–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terlouw, C, Rybarczyk, P 2008. Explaining and predicting differences in meat quality through stress reactions at slaughter: the case of Large White and Duroc pigs. Meat Science 79, 795–805.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terlouw, C, Porcher, J, Fernandez, X 2005. Repeated handling of pigs during rearing. II. Effect of reactivity to humans on aggression during mixing and on meat quality. Journal of Animal Science 83, 1664–1672.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terlouw, C, Berne, A, Astruc, T 2009. Effect of rearing and slaughter conditions on behaviour, physiology and meat quality of Large White and Duroc-sired pigs. Livestock Science 122, 199–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terlouw, C, Arnould, C, Auperin, B, Berri, C, Le Bihan-Duval, E, Deiss, V 2008. Pre-slaughter conditions, animal stress and welfare: current status and possible future research. Animal 2, 1501–1517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, SP, Roehe, R, D'Eath, RB, Ison, SH, Farish, M, Jack, MC, Lundeheim, N, Rydhmer, L, Lawrence, AB 2009. Genetic validation of postmixing skin injuries in pigs as an indicator of aggressiveness and the relationship with injuries under more stable social conditions. Journal of Animal Science 87, 3076–3082.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warriss, PD 1996. The consequences of fighting between mixed groups of unfamiliar pigs before slaughter. Meat Focus International 5, 89–92.Google Scholar
Warriss, PD, Brown, S, Edwards, J, Knowles, T 1998a. Effect of lairage time on levels of stress and meat quality in pigs. Animal Science 66, 255–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warriss, PD, Brown, SN, Gade, PB, Santos, C, Costa, LN, Lambooij, E, Geers, R 1998b. An analysis of data relating to pig carcass quality and indices of stress collected in the European Union. Meat Science 49, 137–144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed