a3 Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-1650. email@example.com http://psychology.berkeley.edu/faculty/profiles/tgriffiths.html
a5 Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck College, University of London, London WC1E 7HX, United Kingdom. firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.bbk.ac.uk/psychology/our-staff/academic/mike-oaksford
If Bayesian Fundamentalism existed, Jones & Love's (J&L's) arguments would provide a necessary corrective. But it does not. Bayesian cognitive science is deeply concerned with characterizing algorithms and representations, and, ultimately, implementations in neural circuits; it pays close attention to environmental structure and the constraints of behavioral data, when available; and it rigorously compares multiple models, both within and across papers. J&L's recommendation of Bayesian Enlightenment corresponds to past, present, and, we hope, future practice in Bayesian cognitive science.
(Online publication August 25 2011)