Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T22:03:06.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exploring the Impact of the Japanese Long-Term Care Insurance Act on the Gendered Stratification of the Care Labour Market Through an Analysis of the Domiciliary Care Provided by Welfare Non-Profit Organisations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2011

Junko Yamashita
Junko Yamashita*
Affiliation:
School of Sociology, Politics and International Studies University of Bristol E-mail: J.Yamashita@bristol.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Japan's implementation of the Long Term Care Insurance Act in 2000 provides a good example with which to examine the restructuring process of care services for older people, as these have come to be commodified by the welfare state. By focusing on Welfare Non-Profit Organisations provision, this article explores the significance of gender in the restructuring process. It reveals that care services are stratified with institutional care placed at the top of hierarchy of care services costs, and domestic task services at the bottom. There is an unequal distribution of gender and organisational type for each type of care work.

Type
Articles
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , October 2011 , pp. 433 - 443
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adachi, K. (2007), Fukushi NPO no Syakaigaku [The Sociology of Non-profit Welfare Organizations], Tokyo: Tokyo University Press.Google Scholar
Beechy, V. (1987), Unequal Work, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Bruegel, I. (1982), ‘Women as a reserve army of labor: a note on recent British experience’, Feminist Review, 3, 12–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J. C. and Ikegami, N. (2003), ‘Japan's radical reform of long-term care’, Social Policy and Administration, 37, 1, 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J. C., Ikegami, N. and Kwon, S. (2009), ‘Policy learning and cross-national diffusion in social long term care insurance: Germany, Japan and the Republic of Korea’, International Social Security Review, 62, 4, 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell, R. (2002), Gender, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hiraoka, K. (2005), ‘Long-term care insurance in Japan’, in Yoon, H. and Hendricks, J. (eds.), Handbook of Asian Aging, New York: Baywood Publishing Co., pp. 355–81.Google Scholar
Hiraoka, K. (2006), ‘Kironi Tatsu Nihon no Kaigo Hoken [Japanese long term care insurance at a turning-point]’, in Takegawa, S. and Lee, H. (eds.), Fukushi Reji-mu no Nikkan Hikaku: Shakai Hoshō, Jyenda and Rōdō Sijyō [Comparing Japanese and Korean Welfare Regimes: Social Security, Gender and Labour Market], Tokyo: Tokyo Daigaku Shuppankai, pp. 123–46.Google Scholar
Ishibashi, T. and Ikegami, N. (2010), ‘Should the provision of home help services be contained?: validation of the new preventive care policy in Japan’, BMC Health Service Research, 10, 224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Izuhara, M. (2003), ‘Social inequality under a new social contract: long-term care in Japan’, Social Policy and Administration, 37, 4, 395–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaigo Rodo Antei Senta (2010), Kaigo Rodo Jittai Chosa Hokokusho [Research Report of Care Labour], Tokyo: Kaigo Rodo Antei Senta.Google Scholar
Kanaya, N. (2003), ‘Is the home-visit care market on equal footing?: differential of conditions affecting performance’, The Nonprofit Review, 3, 1–23.Google Scholar
Ministry of Health and Welfare (1998), Kōsei Hakusho [White Paper on Health and Welfare], Tokyo: Gyōsei.Google Scholar
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (2006), Kaigo Hoken Seido Kaikaku no Gaiyō [The Outline of Reforms of the Long Term Care Insurance Act], Tokyo: MHLW, http://www.mhlw.go.jp/topics/kaigo/topics/0603/dl/data.pdf [accessed 25 September 2010].Google Scholar
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (2010), Kaigo Kyuhuhi Jittai Chōsa Kekka no Gaikyo [General Result of the 2009 Survey of Long Term Care Provision], Tokyo: MHLW, http://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/kaigo/kyufu/09/index.html [accessed 13 November 2010].Google Scholar
Morikawa, M. (1998), ‘Sankagata Fukushi Syakai ni okeru Zaitaku Kaigo Rōdō no Ninchi Kōzō [Structure of recognition of domiciliary care work in participative-style of welfare society]’, in Yamawaki, T., Osawa, M., Omori, T. and Matsubara, R. (eds.), Gendai Nihon no Public Phirosophy [Japanese Contemporary Public Philosophy], Tokyo: Sinseisya, pp. 396–418.Google Scholar
Morikawa, M. (1999), ‘Zaitaku Kaigo Rōdō no Seidoka Katei [The process of institutionalisation of domiciliary care work]’, Ohara Syakai Mondai Kenkyuujyo Zashi [Journal of Ohara Research Institute of Social Issues], 486, 23–39.Google Scholar
Phillips, A. and Taylor, B. (1980), ‘Sex and skill: notes towards a feminist economics’, Feminist Review, 6, 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shikata, M. and Tamiya, Y. (2009), The Political and Social Economy of Care: Japan Research Report 2, Geneva: UNRISD.Google Scholar
Standing, G. (2001), ‘Care work: overcoming insecurity and neglect’, in Daly, M. (ed.), Care Work: The Quest for Security, Geneva: International Labour Office, pp. 15–32.Google Scholar
Ungerson, C. (2000), ‘Thinking about the production and consumption of long-term care in Britain: does gender still matter?’, Journal of Social Policy, 29, 4, 623–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamane, S. (2010), Naze Jyosei ha Kea Rōdō wo Surunoka [Why Do Women Provide Care Labour?], Tokyo: Keiso Shobo.Google Scholar
Yamashita, J. (2007), Non-profit Organisations, Domiciliary Care Services and Gender: A Case Study of the Japanese Long Term Insurance Act. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of York, U.K.Google Scholar
Yamashita, J. (forthcoming), ‘Welfare non-profit organisation and citizen participation in Japan’, Japanese Journal of Social Science.Google Scholar
Zenkoku Shyakai Fukushi Kyogikai (2008), Heisei 20nendo Jyumin Snaka gata Zaitaku Fukushi Sabisu Dantai Katudo Jittai Cōosa Hōkoku [The 2008 Year Report on Resident Participation-Style Domiciliary Service Providing Organisations], Tokyo: Zenkoku Syakai Fukushi Kyogikai.Google Scholar