Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-hgkh8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T16:32:35.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Astronomy and ceremony at Chankillo: an Andean perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2011

J. McKim Malville*
Affiliation:
Department of Astrophysical and Planetary Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA email: kim.malville@colorado.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The towers, plazas, and fortified temple of Chankillo are analyzed within the context of Central Andean culture. Throughout the cultural area, staircases were apparently the scenes of ritual procession, perhaps mimicking shamanic-like movement between the three worlds. The double stairways of the thirteen towers of Chankillo may have been designed for ritual movement. The gradual rotation of the successively higher towers suggests shamanic ascent between the terrestrial and solar realms. The major astronomical feature of Chankillo is its solar axis, oriented to December solstice sunrise and June solstice sunset. Along this axis, to the east and west of the towers, there are prominent plazas in which public ceremonies may have been staged, particularly at the time of June solstice sunset. Celebrants who reached the highest tower on sunset of June solstice would have been silhouetted by the setting sun as viewed by spectators in the eastern plaza just below the tower. In the large plaza west of the towers, a similar public ceremony could have been associated with setting of the June solstice sun over the Temple of the Pillars to the west of the towers. The thirteen towers may have been stations of the moon for public ceremonies during the bright half of the lunar cycle. The presence of Spondylus shells suggests lunar ritual. The duality of private/public ritual, evident at Chavín and elsewhere, may have been present at Chankillo where public ceremonies may been observed from the plazas, while more restricted ceremonies may have occurred behind the walls of the fortified temple. If a horizon calendar had been developed using the profiles of the thirteen towers, it appears to have been an unintended consequence of the initial design of the towers. The monumental size of the towers is incommensurate with the small putative observing stations. The June solstice sun misses the lowest tower by 7 solar diameters, which would have been an unacceptable error if the tower had been built originally to mark June solstice. Another unsatisfactory feature would have been the equal spacing of the towers. If a meaningful calendar had been desired that marked divisions of the year perhaps based upon the moon, it would have involve variable spacing of the towers, with the largest spacing around equinox.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2011

References

Bennett, W. C. 1948, in Bennett, W. C. (ed.), A Reappraisal of Peruvian Archaeology, Memoirs no. 4, Society for American Archaeology, Menasha WI, p. 1.Google Scholar
Bray, T. 2009, Cambridge Archaeological Journal 19, 357.Google Scholar
Cummins, T. 2008, in Conklin, W. J. & Quilter, J. (eds), Chavín: Art, Architecture, and Culture, Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, Los Angeles, p. 279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Altroy, T. 2000, The Incas, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Dixon, E. J. 1999, Bones, Boats, and Bison: Archaeology and the First Colonization of Western North America, The University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Eliade, E. 1964, Shamanism, Pantheon Books, New York.Google Scholar
Ghezzi, I. 2006, in Isbell, W. H. & Silverman, H. (eds), Andean Archaeology III: North and South, Springer, New York, p. 67.Google Scholar
Ghezzi, I. & Ruggles, C. L. N. 2007, Science 315, 1239.Google Scholar
Gruhn, R. 2006, Mammoth Trumpet 21, 10.Google Scholar
Kembel, S. R. 2008, in Conklin, W. J. & Quilter, J. (eds), Chavín: Art, Architecture, and Culture, Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, Los Angeles, p. 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, T. F. 1985, Guitarrero Cave, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Malville, J. M. 2010, Journal of Cosmology 9, 3006.Google Scholar
Malville, J. M., Zawaski, M., & Gullberg, S. 2008, in Vaiškūnas, J. (ed.), Astronomy and Cosmology in Folk Traditions and Cultural Heritage, Archaeologia Baltica 10, Klaipėda University Institute of Baltic Sea Region History and Archaeology, Klaipėda, p. 175.Google Scholar
Moseley, M. 1975, The Maritime Foundations of Andean Civilization, Cummings, Menlo Park.Google Scholar
Rick, J. 2008, in Conklin, W. J. & Quilter, J. (eds), Chavín: Art, Architecture, and Culture, Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, Los Angeles, p. 3.Google Scholar
Shady, R. 2006, in Isbell, W. H. & Silverman, H. (eds), Andean Archaeology III: North and South, Springer, New York, p. 28.Google Scholar
Staller, J. E. 2008, in Staller, J. E. (ed.), Pre-Columbian Landscapes of Creation and Origin, Springer, New York, p. 269.Google Scholar
Tello, J. 1923, Inca 1 (1), 93320.Google Scholar
Zawaski, M. J. & Malville, J. M. 2010, Archaeoastronomy: The Journal of Astronomy in Culture 21, 20.Google Scholar
Zuidema, R. T. 1980, Revista de la Universidad Complutense 28, 317.Google Scholar