Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T09:16:15.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Family obligations and support behaviour: a United States–Netherlands comparison

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2011

TERESA M. COONEY  and
PEARL A. DYKSTRA
TERESA M. COONEY*
Affiliation:
Human Development & Family Studies, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
PEARL A. DYKSTRA
Affiliation:
Sociology, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
*
Address for correspondence: Teresa M. Cooney, Human Development & Family Studies, The University of Missouri, 314 Gentry Hall, Columbia, MO 65211-7700, USA. E-mail: CooneyT@missouri.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study draws on national survey data from the United States of America (USA) and the Netherlands to compare family obligations and support behaviour for middle-generation adults who have a living aged parent and adult child. Consistent with a familialism by default hypothesis based on welfare state differences, the US sample espouses stronger family obligations than the Dutch sample. Yet, the Dutch respondents are more likely to engage in family support behaviours with both the younger and older generations, contrary to a family-steps-in hypothesis. The connection between family obligations and support behaviour is also tested, revealing a stronger association in the US sample, consistent with a family-steps-in hypothesis, but only in regard to relations with ageing parents. We conclude that Dutch respondents are more likely to act on their individual preferences whereas American respondents are more influenced by general norms of obligation towards family members. The findings are discussed in terms of social policy differences between the two countries, and in light of results from comparative European studies of intergenerational relations.

Keywords

family obligationsintergenerational supportsolidarityageing familiesadult child–parent relationssocial policy
Type
Articles
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 31 , Issue 6 , August 2011 , pp. 1026 - 1050
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acock, A. C. 2005. Working with missing values. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 4, 1012–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albertini, M., Kohli, M. and Vogel, C. 2007. Intergenerational transfers of time and money in European families: common patterns different regimes? Journal of European Social Policy, 17, 4, 319–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attias-Donfut, C. and Arber, S. 2000. Equity and solidarity across the generations. In Arber, S. and Attias-Donfut, C. (eds), The Myth of Generational Conflict: The Family and the State in Ageing Societies. Routledge, London, 1–21.Google Scholar
Attias-Donfut, C., Ogg, J. and Wolff, F. C. 2005. European patterns of intergenerational financial and time transfers. European Journal of Ageing, 2, 3, 161–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Attias-Donfut, C. and Wolff, F. C. 2000. The redistributive effects of generational transfers. In Arber, S. and Attias-Donfut, C. (eds), The Myth of Generational Conflict: The Family and the State in Ageing Societies. Routledge, London, 22–46.Google Scholar
Bansak, C. and Raphael, S. 2007. The effects of state policy design features on take-up and crowd-out rates for the State Children's Health Insurance Program. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26, 1, 149–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brandt, M., Haberkern, K. and Szydlik, M. 2009. Intergenerational help and care in Europe. European Sociological Review, 25, 5, 585–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, D. and Jakubson, G. 1995. The connection between public transfers and private interfamily transfers. Journal of Public Economics, 57, 1, 129–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daatland, S. O. and Herlofson, K. 2003. ‘Lost solidarity’ or ‘changed solidarity’: a comparative European view of normative family solidarity. Ageing and Society, 23, 5, 537–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daatland, S. O. and Lowenstein, A. 2005. Intergenerational solidarity and the family–welfare state balance. European Journal of Ageing, 2, 3, 174–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Leeuw, E. D. and De Heer, W. 2001. Trends in household survey nonresponse: a longitudinal and international comparison. In Groves, R. M., Dillman, D. A., Eltinge, J. L. and Little, R. J. A. (eds), Survey Nonresponse. Wiley, New York, 41–54.Google Scholar
Dykstra, P. A. 2010. Intergenerational Family Relationships in Ageing Societies. United Nations, New York and Geneva.Google Scholar
Dykstra, P. A., Kalmijn, M., Knijn, T. C. M., Komter, A. E., Liefbroer, A. C. and Mulder, C. H. 2005. Codebook of the Netherlands Kinship Panel Study, a Multi-actor, Multi-method Panel Study on Solidarity in Family Relationships, Wave 1. NKPS Working Paper No. 4, Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute (NIDI), The Hague.Google Scholar
Finch, J. and Mason, J. 1990. Filial obligations and kin support for elderly people. Ageing and Society, 10, 2, 151–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finley, N. J., Roberts, M. D. and Banahan, B. F. III. 1988. Motivators and inhibitors of attitudes of filial obligation toward aging parents. The Gerontologist, 28, 1, 73–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freeman, L. C. and Romney, A. K. 1987. Words, deeds and social structure: a preliminary study of the reliability of informants. Human Organisation, 46, 4, 330–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grundy, E. and Henretta, J. C. 2006. Between elderly parents and adult children: a new look at the intergenerational care provided by the ‘sandwich generation’. Ageing and Society, 26, 5, 707–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haberkern, K. and Szydlik, M. 2010. State provision, societal opinion and children's care of older parents in 11 European countries. Ageing and Society, 30, 2, 299–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagestad, G. O. 2003. Interdependent lives and relationships in changing times: a life-course view of families and aging. In SetterstenJr., R. A. Jr., R. A. (ed.), Invitation to the Life Course: Toward New Understandings of Later Life. Baywood, Amityville, NY, 135–59.Google Scholar
Hank, K. 2007. Proximity and contacts between older parents and their children: a European comparison. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 1, 157–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, R., Foote, N., Aldous, J., Carlson, R. and MacDonald, R. 1970. Family Development in Three Generations. Schenkman, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Huang, J., Guo, B., Kim, Y. and Sherraden, M. 2010. Parental income, assets, borrowing constraints and children's post-secondary education. Children and Youth Services Review, 32, 4, 585–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalmijn, M. and Saraceno, C. 2008. A comparative perspective on intergenerational support: responsiveness to parental needs in individualistic and familistic countries. European Societies, 10, 3, 479–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein Ikkink, K., van Tilburg, T. and Knipscheer, K. C. P. M. 1999. Perceived instrumental support exchanges in relationships between elderly parents and their adult children: normative and structural explanations. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 4, 831–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kline, P. 1986. A Handbook of Test Construction: Introduction to Psychometric Design. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Kohli, M. 1999. Private and public transfers between generations: linking the family and the state. European Societies, 1, 1, 81–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohli, M., Künemund, H., Motel, A. and Szydlik, M. 2000. Families apart? Intergenerational transfers in East and West Germany. In Arber, S. and Attias-Donfut, C. (eds), The Myth of Generational Conflict: The Family and the State in Ageing Societies. Routledge, London, 88–99.Google Scholar
Künemund, H. 2008. Intergenerational relations within the family and the state. In Saraceno, C. (ed.), Families, Ageing and Social Policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 105–22.Google Scholar
Künemund, H. and Rein, M. 1999. There is more to receiving than needing: the arguments and empirical explorations of crowding in and crowding out. Ageing and Society, 19, 1, 93–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, G. R., Netzer, J. K. and Coward, R. T. 1994. Filial responsibility expectations and patterns of intergenerational assistance. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 3, 559–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowenstein, A. and Daatland, S. O. 2006. Filial norms and family support in a comparative cross-national context: evidence from the OASIS study. Ageing and Society, 26, 2, 203–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lye, D. 1996. Adult child–parent relationships. In Hagan, J. and Cook, K. (eds), Annual Review of Sociology. Annual Reviews, Inc., Palo Alto, California, 79–102.Google Scholar
Millar, J. and Warman, A. 1996. Family Obligations in Europe. Family Policy Studies Centre, London.Google Scholar
Olsen, G. M. 2007. Toward global welfare state convergence? Family policy and health care in Sweden, Canada and the United States. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 34, 2, 143–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polakow, V. 1997. Family policy, welfare, and single motherhood in the United States and Denmark: a cross-national analysis of discourse and practice. Early Education and Development, 8, 3, 245–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quadagno, J. and Street, D. 2006. Recent trends in U.S. social welfare policy: minor retrenchment or major transformation? Research on Aging, 28, 3, 303–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royston, P. 2005. Multiple imputation of missing values: update. Stata Journal, 5, 2, 88–102.Google Scholar
Salganicoff, A., Cubanski, J., Ranji, U. and Neuman, T. 2009. Health coverage and expenses: impact on older women's economic well-being. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 30, 2, 222–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saraceno, C. 2010. Social inequalities in facing old-age dependency: a bi-generational perspective. Journal of European Social Policy, 20, 1, 32–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saraceno, C. and Keck, W. 2010. Can we identify intergenerational policy regimes in Europe? European Societies, 12, 5, 675–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schutz, G., Ursprung, H. W. and Woßmann, L. 2008. Education policy and equality of opportunity. KYKLOS, 61, 2, 279–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, Y. and Zuckerman, S. 2003. Why is there state variation in employer-sponsored insurance? Health Affairs, 22, 1, 241–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silverstein, M., Gans, D. and Yang, F. M. 2006. Intergenerational support to aging parents: the role of norms and needs. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 8, 1068–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smeeding, T. M. 2005. Public policy, economic inequality, and poverty: the United States in comparative perspective. Social Science Quarterly, 86, supplement, 955–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoop, I. A. L. 2005. The Hunt for the Last Respondent: Nonresponse in Sample Surveys. Social and Cultural Planning Office, The Hague.Google Scholar
Stuifbergen, M. C., Dykstra, P. A., Lanting, K. N. and Van Delden, J. J. M. 2010. Autonomy in an ascribed relationship: the case of adult children and elderly parents. Journal of Aging Studies, 24, 4, 257–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweet, J. A. and Bumpass, L. L. 2002. The National Survey of Families and Households – Waves 1, 2, and 3: Data Description and Documentation. Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison. Available online at http://www.ssc.wisc.edu/nsfh/home.htm [Accessed 26 March 2007].Google Scholar
Troll, L. E., Miller, S. J. and Atchley, R. C. 1979. Families in Later Life. Wadsworth, Belmont, California.Google Scholar
Ward, R. 2001. Linkages between family and societal level intergenerational attitudes. Research on Aging, 23, 1, 179–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, R., Capoferro, C. and Soldo, B. J. 1999. Financial assistance from middle-aged couples to parents and children: racial-ethnic differences. Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 54B, 3, S145–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar