Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T19:27:34.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cohabiting in Time: Towards an ecology of rhythm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2011

Peter Nelson
Peter Nelson*
Affiliation:
Music, School of Arts, Culture and Environment, University of Edinburgh, 12, Nicolson Square, Edinburgh, EH8 9DF, UK
*
E-mail: p.nelson@ed.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Most accounts of rhythm focus on notions of duration, pulse and metre, to explore the practices and constructs by which those involved in music performances co-ordinate their involvement. Yet there is a significant body of musical practice where sounds co-habit in time, without the same sorts of constraints found in metric co-ordination: from the gentle singing of Joseph Beuys during his Action Piece I Like America and America Likes Me, to Paul McCartney's song ‘Blackbird’. This is similar, say, to the improvisation practice of composer and trombonist George Lewis in his work with the computer programme Voyager. Starting from some ideas laid out by Gaston Bachelard and Gregory Bateson, and recent writings on critical post-humanism, this paper explores ways of considering ecologies of sounds in time, and their consequences for human musical experience.

Type
Articles
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 16 , Issue 2: Performance Ecosystems , August 2011 , pp. 109 - 114
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agawu, Kofi. 1995. African Rhythm: A Northern Ewe perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bachelard, Gaston. 1936. La Dialectique de la durée. Paris: Boivin & Cie.Google Scholar
Bateson, Gregory. 1967a. Style, Grace and Information in Primitive Art. In Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press 1972, 128–152.Google Scholar
Bateson, Gregory. 1967b. Form Substance and Difference. In Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1972, 454–471.Google Scholar
Einstein, Albert. 1905. On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies. Available online at http://www.temoa.info/node/1762.Google Scholar
Frith, Simon. 1996. Performing Rites. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Graves, Robert. 1955. The Greek Myths. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Keil, Charles. 1987. Participatory Discrepancies and the Power of Music. Cultural Anthropology 2(3): 275–283.Google Scholar
Lewis, George. 1999. Interacting with Latter-Day Musical Automata. Contemporary Music Review 18(3): 99–112.Google Scholar
Lewis, George. 2000. ‘Too Many Notes: Computers, Complexity and Culture in “Voyager” ’. Leonardo Music Journal 10: 33–39.Google Scholar
Lonergan, Prian P. George Lewis: AACM Veteran. n.d. http://www.allaboutjazz.com/php/review_print.php?id=19130 (accessed 13 November 2010).Google Scholar
Nelson, Peter. 2010. Towards a Social Theory of Rhythm. Paper presented to the First International Colloquium on Universals in Music. ESCOM. University of Provence, Aix en Provence, France, 3–4 December 2010.Google Scholar
Roden, David. 2010. ‘Deconstruction and Excision in Philosophical Posthumanism’. Journal of Evolution and Technology 21(1) (June): 27–36.Google Scholar
Sachs, Curt. 1953. Rhythm and Tempo: A Study in Music History. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, Pierre. 1971. À propos des ordinateurs. La Revue Musicale 214–15: 56–57.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Carey. 2009. What Is Posthumanism? Posthumanities Series, volume 8. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar