Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T10:22:16.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multi-component particle-size segregation in shallow granular avalanches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2011

J. M. N. T. GRAY  and
C. ANCEY
J. M. N. T. GRAY*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
C. ANCEY
Affiliation:
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Ecublens, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
*
†Email address for correspondence: nico.gray@manchester.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A general continuum theory for particle-size segregation and diffusive remixing in polydisperse granular avalanches is formulated using mixture theory. Comparisons are drawn to existing segregation theories for bi-disperse mixtures and the case of a ternary mixture of large, medium and small particles is investigated. In this case, the general theory reduces to a system of two coupled parabolic segregation–remixing equations, which have a single diffusion coefficient and three parameters which control the segregation rates between each pair of constituents. Considerable insight into many problems where the effect of diffusive remixing is small is provided by the non-diffusive case. Here the equations reduce to a system of two first-order conservation laws, whose wave speeds are real for a very wide class of segregation parameters. In this regime, the system is guaranteed to be non-strictly hyperbolic for all admissible concentrations. If the segregation rates do not increase monotonically with the grain-size ratio, it is possible to enter another region of parameter space, where the equations may either be hyperbolic or elliptic, depending on the segregation rates and the local particle concentrations. Even if the solution is initially hyperbolic everywhere, regions of ellipticity may develop during the evolution of the problem. Such regions in a time-dependent problem necessarily lead to short wavelength Hadamard instability and ill-posedness. A linear stability analysis is used to show that the diffusive remixing terms are sufficient to regularize the theory and prevent unbounded growth rates at high wave numbers. Numerical solutions for the time-dependent segregation of an initially almost homogeneously mixed state are performed using a standard Galerkin finite element method. The diffuse solutions may be linearly stable or unstable, depending on the initial concentrations. In the linearly unstable region, ‘sawtooth’ concentration stripes form that trap and focus the medium-sized grains. The large and small particles still percolate through the avalanche and separate out at the surface and base of the flow due to the no-flux boundary conditions. As these regions grow, the unstable striped region is annihilated. The theory is used to investigate inverse distribution grading and reverse coarse-tail grading in multi-component mixtures. These terms are commonly used by geologists to describe particle-size distributions in which either the whole grain-size population coarsens upwards, or just the coarsest clasts are inversely graded and a fine-grained matrix is found everywhere. An exact solution is constructed for the steady segregation of a ternary mixture as it flows down an inclined slope from an initially homogeneously mixed inflow. It shows that for distribution grading, the particles segregate out into three inversely graded sharply segregated layers sufficiently far downstream, with the largest particles on top, the fines at the bottom and the medium-sized grains sandwiched in between. The heights of the layers are strongly influenced by the downstream velocity profile, with layers becoming thinner in the faster moving near-surface regions of the avalanche, and thicker in the slowly moving basal layers, for the same mass flux. Conditions for the existence of the solution are discussed and a simple and useful upper bound is derived for the distance at which all the particles completely segregate. When the effects of diffusive remixing are included, the sharp concentration discontinuities are smoothed out, but the simple shock solutions capture many features of the evolving size distribution for typical diffusive remixing rates. The theory is also used to construct a simple model for reverse coarse-tail grading, in which the fine-grained material does not segregate. The numerical method is used to calculate diffuse solutions for a ternary mixture and a sharply segregated shock solution is derived that looks similar to the segregation of a bi-disperse mixture of large and medium grains. The presence of the fine-grained material, however, prevents high concentrations of large or medium particles being achieved and there is a significant lengthening of the segregation distance.

JFM classification

Granular media: Granular media Multiphase and Particle-laden Flows: Multiphase flow Compressible Flows: Shock waves
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 678 , 10 July 2011 , pp. 535 - 588
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abramowitz, M. & Stegun, I. 1970 Handbook of Mathematical Functions, 9th edn., §3.3.7. Dover.Google Scholar
Bagnold, R. A. 1954 Experiments on gravity-free dispersion of large solid spheres in a Newtonian fluid under shear. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 225, 49–63.Google Scholar
Bartelt, P. & McArdell, B. W. 2009 Granulometric investigations of snow avalanches. J. Glaciol. 55 (193), 829–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, J., Tüzün, U., Heyes, D., Hayati, I. & Fredlund, P. 1998 Stratification in poured granular heaps. Nature 391, 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertran, P. 2003 The rock-avalanche of February 1995 at Claix (French Alps). Geomorphology 54, 339–346.Google Scholar
Branney, M. J. & Kokelaar, B. P. 1992 A reappraisal of ignimbrite emplacement: progressive aggradation and changes from particulate to non-particulate flow during emplacement of high-grade ignimbrite. Bull. Volcanol. 54, 504–520.Google Scholar
Bridgwater, J. 1976 Fundamental powder mixing mechanisms. Powder Technol. 15, 215–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cagnoli, B. & Manga, M. 2005 Vertical segregation in granular mass flows: A shear cell study. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L10402.Google Scholar
Cagnoli, B. & Romano, G. P. 2010 Effect of grain size on mobility of dry granular flows of angular rock fragments: An experimental determination. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 193 (1–2), 18–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calder, E. S., Sparks, R. S. J. & Gardeweg, M. C. 2000 Erosion, transport and segregation of pumice and lithic clasts in pyroclastic flows inferred from ignimbrite at Lascar Volcano, Chile. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 104, 201–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cas, R. A. & Wright, J. V. 1987 Volcanic Successions. Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Chadwick, P. 1976 Continuum Mechanics. Concise Theory and Problems. Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Cole, J. D. 1951 On a quasilinear parabolic equation occurring in aerodynamics. Q. Appl. Maths 9, 225–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, J. E. & Williams, G. 1984 Debris flow dynamics. Tech. Rep. 84–606. (Videotape) US Geological Survey.Google Scholar
Courant, R. & Hilbert, D. 1962 Methods of Mathematical Physics, vol. 2. Interscience.Google Scholar
Dade, W. B. & Huppert, H. E. 1998 Long-runout rockfalls. Geology 26, 803–806.Google Scholar
Dolgunin, V. N. & Ukolov, A. A. 1995 Segregation modelling of particle rapid gravity flow. Powder Technol. 83, 95–103.Google Scholar
Drahun, J. A. & Bridgwater, J. 1983 The mechanisms of free surface segregation. Powder Technol. 36, 39–53.Google Scholar
Ehrichs, E. E., Jaeger, H. M., Karczmar, G. S., Knight, J. B., Kuperman, V. Y. & Nagel, S. R. 1995 Granular convection observed by magnetic-resonance-imaging. Science 267, 1632–1634.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Félix, G. & Thomas, N. 2004 Relation between dry granular flow regimes and morphology of deposits: formation of levées in pyroclastic deposits. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 221, 197–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goddard, J. D. 2003 Material instability in complex fluids. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 35, 113–133.Google Scholar
Golick, L. A. & Daniels, K. E. 2009 Mixing and segregation rates in sheared granular materials. Phys. Rev. E 80 (4), 042301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goujon, C., Dalloz-Dubrujeaud, B. & Thomas, N. 2007 Bidisperse granular avalanches on inclined planes: A rich variety of behaviours. Eur. Phys. J. E 23, 199–215.Google Scholar
Gray, J. M. N. T. 1999 Loss of hyperbolicity and ill-posedness of the viscous-plastic sea ice rheology in uniaxial divergent flow. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 29 (11), 2920–2929.Google Scholar
Gray, J. M. N. T. 2001 Granular flow in partially filled slowly rotating drums. J. Fluid Mech. 441, 1–29.Google Scholar
Gray, J. M. N. T. 2010 Particle size segregation in granular avalanches: A brief review of recent progress. AIP Conf. Proc. 1227, 343–362.Google Scholar
Gray, J. M. N. T. & Ancey, C. 2009 Segregation, recirculation and deposition of coarse particles near two-dimensional avalanche fronts. J. Fluid Mech. 629, 387–423.Google Scholar
Gray, J. M. N. T. & Chugunov, V. A. 2006 Particle-size segregation and diffusive remixing in shallow granular avalanches. J. Fluid Mech. 569, 365–398.Google Scholar
Gray, J. M. N. T. & Hutter, K. 1997 Pattern formation in granular avalanches. Contin. Mech. Thermodyn. 9, 341–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J. M. N. T. & Kokelaar, B. P. 2010 a Large particle segregation, transport and accumulation in granular free-surface flows. J. Fluid Mech. 652, 105–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J. M. N. T. & Kokelaar, B. P. 2010 b Large particle segregation, transport and accumulation in granular free-surface flows – erratum. J. Fluid Mech. 657, 539.Google Scholar
Gray, J. M. N. T., Shearer, M. & Thornton, A. R. 2006 Time-dependent solutions for particle-size segregation in shallow granular avalanches. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 462, 947–972.Google Scholar
Gray, J. M. N. T., Tai, Y. C. & Noelle, S. 2003 Shock waves, dead-zones and particle-free regions in rapid granular free-surface flows. J. Fluid Mech. 491, 161–181.Google Scholar
Gray, J. M. N. T. & Thornton, A. R. 2005 A theory for particle size segregation in shallow granular free-surface flows. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 461, 1447–1473.Google Scholar
Gray, J. M. N. T., Wieland, M. & Hutter, K. 1999 Free surface flow of cohesionless granular avalanches over complex basal topography. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 455, 1841–1874.Google Scholar
Grigorian, S. S., Eglit, M. E. & Iakimov, Yu. L. 1967 A new formulation and solution of the problem of snow avalanche movement. Tr. Vysokogornogo Geofizicheskogo Instituta, vol. 12, 104–113.Google Scholar
Gruber, U. & Bartelt, P. 2007 Snow avalanche hazard modelling of large areas using shallow water numerical methods and GIS. Environ. Model. Softw. 22 (10), 1472–1481.Google Scholar
Herrmann, H. J., Mantica, G. & Bessis, D. 1990 Space-filling bearings. Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (26), 3223–3226.Google Scholar
Hill, K. M., Gioia, G. & Amaravadi, D. 2004 Radial segregation patterns in rotating granular mixtures: Waviness selection. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 224301.Google Scholar
Hill, K. M. & Kakalios, J. 1995 Reversible axial segregation of rotating granular media. Phys. Rev. E 52 (4), 4393–4400.Google Scholar
Hill, K. M., Kharkar, D. V., Gilchrist, J. F., McCarthy, J. J. & Ottino, J. M. 1999 Segregation driven organization in chaotic granular flows. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 11701–11706.Google Scholar
Hiscott, R. N. 2003 In Encyclopedia of Sediments and Sedimentary Rocks (ed. Middleton, G. V.), pp. 333–335. Springer.Google Scholar
Hopf, E. 1950 The partial differential equation u t + uu x = μu xx. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 3, 201–230.Google Scholar
Iverson, R. M. 1997 The physics of debris-flows. Rev. Geophy. 35, 245–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iverson, R. M. 2003 The debris-flow rheology myth. In Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction and Assessment (ed. Rickenmann, D. & Chen, C. L.), pp. 303–314. Millpress.Google Scholar
Iverson, R. M. & Denlinger, R. P. 2001 Flow of variably fluidized granular masses across three-dimensional terrain. 1. Coulomb mixture theory. J. Geophys. Res. 106 (B1), 553–566.Google Scholar
Iverson, R. M., Logan, M., LaHusen, R. G. & Berti, M. 2010 The perfect debris flow? aggregated results from 28 large-scale experiments. J. Geophys. Res. 115, F03005.Google Scholar
Iverson, R. M. & Vallance, J. W. 2001 New views of granular mass flows. Geology 29 (2), 115–118.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jha, A. K. & Puri, V. M. 2010 Percolation segregation of multi-size and multi-component particulate materials. Powder Technol. 197 (3), 274–282.Google Scholar
Johanson, J. R. 1978 Particle segregation . . . and what to do about it. Chem. Engng, May, pp. 183–188.Google Scholar
Jomelli, V. & Bertran, P. 2001 Wet snow avalanche deposits in the French Alps: Structure and sedimentology. Geografiska Annaler. A Phys. Geog. 83, 15–28.Google Scholar
Jop, P., Forterre, Y. & Pouliquen, O. 2006 A constitutive relation for dense granular flows. Nature 44, 727–730.Google Scholar
Joseph, D. D. & Saut, J. C. 1990 Short-wave instabilities and ill-posed initial-value problems. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 1, 191–227.Google Scholar
Khakhar, D. V., McCarthy, J. J. & Ottino, J. M. 1997 Radial segregation of granular mixtures in rotating cylinders. Phys. Fluids 9, 3600–3614.Google Scholar
Khakhar, D. V., McCarthy, J. J. & Ottino, J. M. 1999 Mixing and segregation of granular materials in chute flows. Chaos 9, 594–610.Google Scholar
Kynch, G. J. 1952 A theory of sedimentation. Trans. Faraday Soc. 48, 166–176.Google Scholar
Lax, P. D. 1957 Hyperbolic systems of conservation laws 2. Commun. Pure Appl. Maths 10 (4), 537–566.Google Scholar
Makse, H. A., Havlin, S., King, P. R. & Stanley, H. E. 1997 Spontaneous stratification in granular mixtures. Nature 386, 379–382.Google Scholar
Mangeney, A., Bouchut, F., Thomas, N., Vilotte, J. P. & Bristeau, M. O. 2007 Numerical modeling of self-channeling granular flows and of their levee-channel deposits. J. Geophys. Res. 112, F02017.Google Scholar
May, L. B. H., Golick, L. A., Phillips, K. C., Shearer, M. & Daniels, K. E. 2010 Shear-driven size segregation of granular materials: Modeling and experiment. Phys. Rev. E 81 (5), 051301.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. J. 2009 Turning the corner in segregation. Powder Technol. 192 (2), 137–142.Google Scholar
Middleton, G. V. 1970 Experimental studies related to problems of flysch sedimentation. In Flysch Sedimentology in North America (ed. Lajoie, J.), pp. 253–272. Business and Economics Science Ltd.Google Scholar
Middleton, G. V. & Hampton, M. A. 1976 Subaqueous sediment transport and deposition by sediment gravity flows. In Marine Sediment Transport and Environmental Management (ed. Stanley, D. J. & Swift, D. J. P.), pp. 197–218. Wiley.Google Scholar
Morland, L. W. 1992 Flow of viscous fluids through a porous deformable matrix. Surv. Geophys. 13, 209–268.Google Scholar
Newey, M., Ozik, J., Van der Meer, S. M., Ott, E. & Losert, W. 2004 Band-in-band segregation of multidisperse granular mixtures. Eur. Phys. Lett. 66 (2), 205.Google Scholar
Palladino, D. M. & Valentine, G. A. 1995 Coarse-tail vertical and lateral grading in pyroclastic flow deposits of the Latera Volcanic Complex (Vulsini, Central Italy): origin and implications for flow dynamics. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 69 (3–4), 343–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, J. C., Hogg, A. J., Kerswell, R. R. & Thomas, N. H. 2006 Enhanced mobility of granular mixtures of fine and coarse particles. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 246, 466–480.Google Scholar
Pierson, T. C. 1986 Flow behavior of channelized debris flows, Mount St. Helens, Washington. In Hillslope Processes (ed. Abrahams, A. D.), pp. 269–296. Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Pitman, E. B., Nichita, C. C., Patra, A., Bauer, A., Sheridan, M. & Bursik, M. 2003 Computing granular avalanches and landslides. Phys. Fluids 15 (12), 3638–3646.Google Scholar
Pouliquen, O. 1999 a Scaling laws in granular flows down rough inclined planes. Phys. Fluids 11 (3), 542–548.Google Scholar
Pouliquen, O. 1999 b On the shape of granular fronts down rough inclined planes. Phys. Fluids 11 (7), 1956–1958.Google Scholar
Pouliquen, O., Delour, J. & Savage, S. B. 1997 Fingering in granular flows. Nature 386, 816–817.Google Scholar
Pouliquen, O. & Vallance, J. W. 1999 Segregation induced instabilities of granular fronts. Chaos 9 (3), 621–630.Google Scholar
Rhee, H. K., Aris, R. & Amundson, N. R. 1986 First-Order Partial Differential Equations, vol. 1: Theory and Applications of Single Equations. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Rognon, P. G., Roux, J. N., Naaim, M. & Chevoir, F. 2007 Dense flows of bidisperse assemblies of disks down an inclined plane. Phys. Fluids 19, 058101.Google Scholar
Rosato, A., Strandburg, K. J., Prinz, F. & Swendsen, R. H. 1987 Why the Brazil nuts are on top: Size segregation of particulate matter by shaking. Phys. Rev. Lett. 58 (10), 1038–1040.Google Scholar
Savage, S. B. & Hutter, K. 1989 The motion of a finite mass of granular material down a rough incline. J. Fluid Mech. 199, 177–215.Google Scholar
Savage, S. B. & Lun, C. K. K. 1988 Particle size segregation in inclined chute flow of dry cohesionless granular solids. J. Fluid Mech. 189, 311–335.Google Scholar
Schröter, M., Ulrich, S., Kreft, J., Swift, J. B. & Swinney, H. L. 2006 Mechanisms in the size segregation of a binary granular mixture. Phys. Rev. E 74 (1), 011307.Google Scholar
Schulze, D. 2008 Powders and Bulk Solids. Springer.Google Scholar
Scott, A. M. & Bridgwater, J. 1975 Interparticle percolation: A fundamental solids mixing mechanism. Ind. Engng Chem. Fundam. 14 (1), 22–27.Google Scholar
Shearer, M. & Dafermos, C. 2010 Finite time emergence of a shock wave for scalar conservation laws. J. Hyperbolic Differ. Equ. 7 (1), 107–116.Google Scholar
Shearer, M. & Giffen, N. 2010 Shock formation and breaking in granular avalanches. Discr. Contin. Dyn. Sys. 27 (2, Special Issue), 693–714.Google Scholar
Shearer, M., Gray, J. M. N. T. & Thornton, A. R. 2008 Stable solutions of a scalar conservation law for particle-size segregation in dense granular avalanches. Eur. J. Appl. Maths 19, 61–86.Google Scholar
Shinbrot, T. & Muzzio, F. J. 1998 Reverse buoyancy in shaken granular beds. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (20), 4365–4368.Google Scholar
Skeel, R. D. & Berzins, M. 1990 A method for the spatial discretization of parabolic equations in one space variable. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 11 (1), 1–32.Google Scholar
Thornton, A. R. & Gray, J. M. N. T. 2008 Breaking size-segregation waves and particle recirculation in granular avalanches. J. Fluid Mech. 596, 261–284.Google Scholar
Thornton, A. R., Gray, J. M. N. T. & Hogg, A. J. 2006 A three-phase mixture theory for particle size segregation in shallow granular free-surface flows. J. Fluid Mech. 550, 1–25.Google Scholar
Truesdell, C. 1984 Rational Thermodynamics. Springer.Google Scholar
Vallance, J. W. & Savage, S. B. 2000 Particle segregation in granular flows down chutes. In IUTAM Symposium on Segregation in Granular Materials (ed. Rosato, A. D. & Blackmore, D. L.), pp. 31–51. Kluwer.Google Scholar
Whitham, G. B. 1974 Linear and Nonlinear Waves. John Wiley.Google Scholar
Wiederseiner, S., Andreini, N., Epely-Chauvin, G., Moser, G., Monnereau, M., Gray, J. M. N. T. & Ancey, C. 2011 Experimental investigation into segregating granular flows down chutes. Phys. Fluids 23, 013301.Google Scholar
Williams, S. C. 1968 The mixing of dry powders. Powder Technol. 2, 13–20.Google Scholar
Wills, B. A. 1979 Mineral Processing Technology. Pergamon.Google Scholar
Zanuttigh, B. & Di Paolo, A. 2006 Experimental analysis of the segregation of dry avalanches and implications for debris flows. J. Hydraul. Res. 44 (6), 796–806.Google Scholar
Zanuttigh, B. & Ghilardi, P. 2010 Segregation process of water-granular mixtures released down a steep chute. J. Hydrol. 391 (1–2), 175–187.Google Scholar
Zuriguel, I., Gray, J. M. N. T., Peixinho, J. & Mullin, T. 2006 Pattern selection by a granular wave in a rotating drum. Phys. Rev. E 73, 061302.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Gray and Ancey supplementary material

Equations and formulae

Download Gray and Ancey supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 5.7 KB