Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T09:35:08.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What Can Qualitative Research Tell Us about Service User Perspectives of CBT for Psychosis? A Synthesis of Current Evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2011

Clio Berry*
Affiliation:
University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
Mark Hayward
Affiliation:
Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton and Hove, UK
*
Reprint requests to Clio Berry, University of Sussex, School of Psychology, Pevensey 1, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9HQ, UK. E-mail: c.berry@sussex.ac.uk

Abstract

Background: Although recommended in national treatment guidelines, there is much that is still unknown about CBT for psychosis (CBTp) in terms of the process and experience of the therapy. One way to investigate these gaps in knowledge is to explore service users' experiences through qualitative research. Aims: To consolidate existing qualitative explorations of CBTp from a service user perspective. Method: Qualitative synthesis and comparison with previous research findings. Results: Two analytical themes were created from initial descriptive themes common to multiple studies: “The ingredients in the process of therapy” and “What is the process of therapy?” Conclusions: Qualitative synthesis is a useful method for generating new insights from multiple qualitative studies. Service user perspectives on CBTp corroborate existing research and may also offer more novel findings regarding the ingredients and process of therapy. However, qualitative studies are limited in number and do not always maximize the prominence of service user experience.

Type
Brief Clinical Reports
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abba, N., Chadwick, P. and Stevenson, P. (2007). Responding mindfully to distressing psychosis: a grounded theory analysis. Psychotherapy Research, 18, 7787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadwick, P. D. J., Birchwood, M. H. J. and Trower, P. (1996). Cognitive Therapy for Delusions, Voices and Paranoia. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
Chadwick, P. D. J., Newman Taylor, K. and Abba, N. (2005). Mindfulness groups for people with psychosis. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 33, 351359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadwick, P. D. J., Sambrooke, S., Rashch, S. and Davies, E. (2000). Challenging the omnipotence of voices: group cognitive behaviour therapy for voices. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 38, 9931003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dixon-Woods, M., Bonas, S., Booth, A., Jones, D. R., Miller, T., Shaw, R. L. et al. . (2006) How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective. Qualitative Research, 6, 2744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudley, R., Brabban, A. and Turkington, D. (2009). Cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis. In Alanen, Y. O., González de Chávez, M., Silver, A. S. and Martindale, B. (Eds.), Psychotherapeutic Approaches to Schizophrenic Psychoses. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dunn, H., Morrison, A. P. and Bentall, R. (2002). Patients’ experiences of homework tasks in cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis: a qualitative analysis. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 9, 361369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, D., Garety, P. and Kuipers, E. (1995). Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy for Psychosis. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Goodliffe, L., Hayward, M., Brown, D., Turton, W. and Dannahy, L. (2010). Group person-based cognitive therapy for distressing voices: views from the hearers. Psychotherapy Research, 20, 447461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayward, M. and Fuller, E. (2010). Relating therapy for people who hear voices: perspectives from clients, family members, referrers and therapists. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 17, 363373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayward, M., Overton, J., Dorey, T. and Denney, J. (2009). Relating therapy for people who hear voices: a case series. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 16, 216227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGowan, J., Lavendar, T. and Garety, P. (2005). Factors in outcome of cognitive-behavioural therapy for psychosis: users’ and clinicians’ views. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 78, 513529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Messari, S. and Hallam, R. (2003). CBT for psychosis: a qualitative analysis of clients’ experiences. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 42, 171188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morberg Pain, C., Chadwick, P. D. J. and Abba, N. (2008). Clients’ experiences of case formulation in cognitive behaviour therapy for psychosis. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 47, 127138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrison, A. P. and Barratt, S. (2010). What are the components of CBT for psychosis? A Delphi study. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 36, 136142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, H. E. (1997). CBT with Schizophrenia: a practice manual. Cheltenham, UK: Stanley Thornes.Google Scholar
Newton, E., Larkin, M., Melhuish, R. and Wykes, T. (2007). More than just a place to talk: young people's experiences of group psychological therapy as an early intervention for auditory hallucinations. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 80, 127149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noyes, J. and Popay, J. (2007). Directly observed therapy and tuberculosis: how can a systematic review of qualitative research contribute to improving services? A qualitative meta-synthesis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 57, 227243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thornicroft, G., Rose, D., Huxley, P., Dale, G. and Wykes, T. (2002). What are the research priorities of mental health service users? Journal of Mental Health, 11, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wykes, T., Parr, A. and Landau, S. (1999). Group treatment of auditory hallucinations: exploratory study of effectiveness. British Journal of Psychiatry, 175, 180185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Berry Supplementary Material

Berry Extended Report

Download Berry Supplementary Material(File)
File 121.9 KB
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.