Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T00:29:19.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ANALYSIS OF DIFFUSION STRATEGIES IN NORTHEAST BRAZIL FOR NEW CASSAVA VARIETIES WITH IMPROVED NUTRITIONAL QUALITY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2011

CAROLINA GONZALEZ ,
SALOMON PEREZ ,
CARLOS ESTEVAO CARDOSO ,
ROBERT ANDRADE  and
NANCY JOHNSON
CAROLINA GONZALEZ*
Affiliation:
International Center for Tropical Agriculture, Km. 17 recta Cali-Palmira, Cali, Valle del Cauca, Colombia
SALOMON PEREZ
Affiliation:
International Center for Tropical Agriculture, Km. 17 recta Cali-Palmira, Cali, Valle del Cauca, Colombia
CARLOS ESTEVAO CARDOSO
Affiliation:
International Center for Tropical Agriculture, Km. 17 recta Cali-Palmira, Cali, Valle del Cauca, Colombia
ROBERT ANDRADE
Affiliation:
International Center for Tropical Agriculture, Km. 17 recta Cali-Palmira, Cali, Valle del Cauca, Colombia
NANCY JOHNSON
Affiliation:
International Center for Tropical Agriculture, Km. 17 recta Cali-Palmira, Cali, Valle del Cauca, Colombia
*
†Corresponding author. c.gonzalez@cgiar.org
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Biofortified staple crops, amongst them cassava, are being developed to reduce problems of micronutrient malnutrition. In 2006 new cassava varieties with increased levels of provitamin A were released. For the purpose of enhancing adoption of the new cassava varieties, two strategies were used: (1) a participatory research approach and (2) public awareness raising activities. This paper attempts to evaluate the results of these two diffusion strategies. Within the first strategy, the factors found to enhance adoption rates were: awareness of the new varieties' advantages, public entities as the main information sources and involvement in participatory research. Within the second strategy, trends were found between adoption rates and producer characteristics including: ownership of land, middle-level income, advanced education level and use of information media, namely the Internet. In both strategies, a lack of seeds was one of the main factors limiting the adoption process.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , July 2011 , pp. 539 - 552
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baltussen, R., Knai, C. and Sharan, M. (2004). Iron fortification and iron supplementation are cost-effective interventions to reduce iron deficiency in four subregions in the world. Journal of Nutrition 134: 2678–2684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruges, M. and Smith, W. (2008). Participatory approaches for sustainable agriculture: A contradiction in terms? Agriculture and Human Values 25: 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carneiro, M. C. (2006). Aspectos sociais. In Aspectos Socioeconômicos e Agronômicos da Mandioca (Eds Souza, L. S., Farias, A. R, Mattos, P. L. and Goncalves, W. M.), Cruz das Almas: Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura Tropical, Cruz das Almas, Brazil.Google Scholar
CIMMYT. (1993). La adopción de tecnologías agrícolas: Guía para el diseño de encuestas. Programa de Economía. México, D.F.Google Scholar
Elizondo, F. I., Hernández, J. C. and Araya, R. (2004). La evaluación participativa en los procesos de fitomejoramiento del frijol. In VIII Reunión anual del sector frijolero de Costa Rica, Agosto de 2003. San Carlos, Costa Rica, 25–28.Google Scholar
FAO. (2004). The State of Food Insecurity in the World. Rome. Available online at: http://www.fao.org/docrep/007/y5650e/y5650e00.htm [Accessed November 2010].Google Scholar
Fukuda, M. W. G., Souza, L., Fukuda, CH., Santos, V., Borromeu, C., Silva, M. N., Coreolano, J. W., Pinho, J. L. and Santos, A. R. (2008). Adopção de variedades de mandioca de polpa amarela para mesa no nordeste brasileiro. Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura Tropical, Cruz das Almas, Brasil. Boletim de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento no. 41.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, C., Kruze, I., Sequiera, L., Fukuda, C., Olivera, R. and Johnson, N.,(2005). Findings of a qualitative survey on cassava and beans in Paraiba Brazil. International Center for Tropical Agriculture, Cali.Google Scholar
Heyd, H. (2007). Food consumption, micronutrient malnutrition and the potential of orange-fleshed sweet potatoes in Uganda. Doctoral Dissertation, Institute for Agricultural Economics and Social Sciences in the Tropics and Subtropics, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Lebart, L., Morineau, A. and Warwick, K. (1984). Multivariate Descriptive Statistical Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Meenakshi, J. V., Johnson, N. L., Manyong, V., de Groote, H., Javelosa, J., Yanggen, D., Naher, F., Gonzalez, C., Garcia, J. and Meng, E. (2010). How cost-effective is biofortification in combating micronutrient malnutrition? An ex ante assessment. World Development 38: 64–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qaim, M., Stein, A. J., and Meenakshi, J. V. (2007). Economics of biofortification. Agricultural Economics 37 (S1): 119–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WHO. (2008). Micronutrient deficiency information system. Available online at: http://www.who.int/vmnis/en/ [Accessed November 2010].Google Scholar
Wünscher, T., Schultze-Kraft, R., Peters, M. and Rivas, L. (2004). Early adoption of the tropical forage legume Arachis pintoi in Huetar Norte, Costa Rica. Experimental Agriculture 40: 257–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar