Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T22:56:29.904Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Net Exports and the Avoidance of High Unemployment During Reconversion, 1945–1947

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2011

Jason E. Taylor ,
Bharati Basu  and
Steven McLean
Jason E. Taylor*
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Economics, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI 48859. E-mail: taylo2je@cmich.edu.
Bharati Basu*
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Economics, College of Business Administration, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI 48859. E-mail: basu1b@cmich.edu.
Steven McLean*
Affiliation:
Departmental Manager, Telecommunications Division, Michigan Public Service Commission, P.O. Box 30221, Lansing, MI 48909. E-mail: sqmclean@gmail.com.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While economists predicted a return to double-digit unemployment rates during the reconversion from World War II, this outcome did not materialize. This article explores the role that the significant rise in net exports—which accounted for nearly 4 percent of GDP in 1946 and 1947—played in helping the United States avoid a postwar unemployment problem. Using an input-output analysis, we find that the export surplus directly accounted for 1.33 million jobs in 1946 and 1.97 million jobs in 1947. This accounts for close to half of the gains to private sector employment during these years.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 71 , Issue 2 , 06 June 2011 , pp. 444 - 454
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ballard, Jack Stokes.Shock of Peace. Washington, DC: University Press of America, 1983.Google Scholar
Barro, Robert, and Redlick, Charles. “Macroeconomic Effects from Government Purchases and Taxes.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Blinder, Alan, and Zandi, Mark. “How the Great Depression was Brought to an End.” Report downloaded January 10, 2011 from www.economy.com/mark-zandi/documents/End-of-Great-Recession.pdf, (2010).Google Scholar
Cogan, John F., Cwik, Tobias, Taylor, John B., and Wieland, Volker. “New Keynesian versus Old Keynesian Government Spending Multipliers.” NBER Working Paper No. 14782, Cambridge, MA, February 2009.Google Scholar
Dulles, Allen W.The Marshall Plan, edited with introduction by Michael Wala. Providence, RI: Berg Publishers, 1993.Google Scholar
Economic Report of the President. Washington, DC: USGPO, 1947.Google Scholar
Eichengreen, Barry. The European Economy Since 1945. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Ellis, Howard S.The Economics of Freedom: The Progress and Future of Aid to Europe. New York: Harper Brothers, 1950.Google Scholar
Fishback, Price V., and Kachanovskaya, Valentina. In Search of the Multiplier for Federal Spending in the States During the New Deal.”National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, No. 16561 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Robert Aaron.Business Fluctuations. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1952.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert J., and Krenn, Robert. “The End of the Great Depression 1939–41: Policy Contributions and Fiscal Multipliers” CEPR Discussion Paper no. 8034. London, Centre for Economic Policy Research. http://www.cepr.org/pubs/dps/DP8034.asp, 2010.Google Scholar
Hansen, Alvin. The Postwar American Economy Performance & Problems. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1964.Google Scholar
Harvard Economic Research Project. Studies in the Structure of the American Economy. New York: Oxford University Press, 1952.Google Scholar
Higgs, Robert. “From Central Planning to the Market: The American Transition, 1945–47.” The Journal of Economic History 59 (1999): 600–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Historical Statistics of the United States Millennial Edition Online. Available at www.hsus.cambridge.org. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Koistinen, Paul A. C.Arsenal of World War II: The Political Economy of American Warfare, 1940–45. Kansas: University of Kansas Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Leontief, Wassily W.Domestic Production and Foreign Trade: The American Capital Position Re-examined. American Philosophical Society 97 (1953): 332–48.Google Scholar
Milward, Alan S.The Reconstruction of Western Europe, 1945–1951. London: Methuen, 1984.Google Scholar
Picard, Louis A., and Buss, Terry F.. A Fragile Balance: Re-examining the History of Foreign Aid, Security, and Diplomacy. Sterling, VA: Kumarian Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Romer, David, and Romer, Christina. “The Macroeconomic Effects of Tax Changes: Estimates Based on a New Measure of Fiscal Shocks.” American Economic Review 100 (2010): 763–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segreto, Luciano. “Reopening the Doors: U.S. Private Investments in Italy and the International Economic Integration Policy of the Italian Government, 1945–1965.” Business and Economic History 24 (1995): 231–42.Google Scholar
United States Bureau of the Budget. United States at War. Washington, DC: USGPO, 1946.Google Scholar
United States Office of War Mobilization and Reconversion. From War to Peace: A Challenge. Washington, DC: USGPO, 1945.Google Scholar
Vatter, Harold G.The U.S. Economy in World War II. New York: Columbia University Press, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vedder, Richard, and Gallaway, Lowell. Out of Work. New York: Holmes & Meir, 1993.Google Scholar