Hostname: page-component-6b989bf9dc-6f5p8 Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-04-14T10:51:56.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Race, Law, and Comparative History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 May 2011

Extract

What are we comparing when we compare law and race across cultures? This was once an easier question to answer. If we take “races” to be real categories existing in the world, then we can compare “race relations” and “racial classifications” in different legal systems, and measure the impact of different legal systems on the salience of racial distinction and the level of racial hierarchy in a given society. That was the approach of the leading comparativist scholars at mid-century. Frank Tannenbaum and Carl Degler compared race relations in the United States and Latin America, drawing heavily on legal sources regarding racial definition, manumission of slaves, and marriage. They were studying relations between “white people” and “Negroes,” as well as the possibility of an intermediate class of “mulattoes.” But once we understand race itself to be produced by relations of domination, through several powerful discourses of which law is one, we are up against a more formidable challenge. We must compare the interaction of two things—legal processes and ideologies of race—in systems in which neither is likely to have a stable or equivalent meaning. Because “law” is likewise no longer as clear-cut a category as it once was; in addition to the formal law of statute books and common law appellate opinions, we now understand “law” to encompass a broad set of institutions, discourses, and processes produced by a larger cast of characters than solely jurists, legislators, and appellate judges.

Type
Forum: Essay
Copyright
Copyright © the American Society for Legal History, Inc. 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Tannenbaum, Frank, Slave and Citizen: The Negro in America (New York: Random House, 1946)Google Scholar; and Degler, Carl, Neither Black Nor White: Slavery and Race Relations in Brazil and the United States (New York: Macmillan, 1971)Google Scholar.

2. For discussion of this work, see Gross, Ariela, “Beyond Black and White: Cultural Approaches to Race and Slavery,” Columbia Law Review 101 (2001): 640–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Fuente, Alejandro de la and Gross, Ariela, “Comparative Studies of Law, Race and Slavery in the Americas,” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 6 (2010): 469–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3. Gross, Ariela J., What Blood Won't Tell: A History of Race on Trial in America (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4. Bsumek, Erika, Indian Made: Navajo Culture in the Marketplace, 1868–1940 (Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 2008)Google Scholar; Pascoe, Peggy, What Comes Naturally: Miscegenation Law and the Making of Race in America (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar; Guglielmo, Thomas A., “‘Red Cross, Double Cross’: Race and America's World War II-Era Blood Donor Service,” Journal of American History 97 (2010): 6390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5. Gross, What Blood Won't Tell, ch. 8.

6. See Fredrickson, George M., The Comparative Imagination: On the History of Racism, Nationalism, and Social Movements (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000), 4755Google Scholar.

7. For discussions of legal history and comparative law, see Reinhard Zimmermann, “Legal History and Comparative Law,” speech at the University of Lleida on October 25, 2007, at http://www.udl.es/export/sites/UdL/organs/secretaria/.../zimmermann_discurs.pdf, last accessed December 2, 2010; Comparative Law and Legal History in the United States,” American Journal of Comparative Law 46 (1998):1Google Scholar; and Michele Graziadei, “Comparative Law, Legal History, and the Holistic Approach to Legal Cultures,” // Rivista critica del diritto privato. 1999, Vol. XVII. No. 3. 1–28 / Electronic resource The Cardozo Institutea / http://www.jus.unitn.it/cardozo/Critica/Graziadei.htm.

8. See Tannenbaum, Slave and Citizen; and Fuente, Alejandro de la, “Slave Law and Claims-Making in Cuba: The Tannenbaum Debate Revisited,” Law and History Review 22 (2004): 339–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9. Tomlins, Christopher, Freedom Bound: Law, Labor, and Civic Identity in English Colonizing America, 1580–1865 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sweet, James H., “The Iberian Roots of American Racist Thought,” William & Mary Quartery 54 (1997):143–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Blumenthal, Debra, Enemies and Familiars: Slavery and Mastery in Fifteenth-Century Valencia (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2009)Google Scholar; Alejandro de la Fuente and Ariela Gross, “Race Under Slavery in the Americas” (unpublished paper in possession of the author).

10. Telles, Edward E., Race in Another America: The Significance of Skin Color in Brazil (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006)Google Scholar; Skidmore, Thomas, “Racial Ideas and Social Policy in Brazil, 1870–1940,” in The Idea of Race in Latin America, 1870–1940, ed. Graham, Richard (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1990), 736Google Scholar; Silva, Denise Ferreira da, “Facts of Blackness: Brazil is not (Quite) the United States … And, Racial Politics in Brazil?” in Social Identities 4 (1998): 201234CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11. Scott, Rebecca, Degrees of Freedom: Louisiana and Cuba after Slavery (Harvard University Press, 2005)Google Scholar.

12. Fredrickson, The Comparative Imagination, 80, 85; and Fredrickson, George M., Racism: A Short History (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002)Google Scholar.

13. Thomas Holt, “The Problem of ‘Race’ in The Twenty-First Century” (The Nathan Huggins Lectures, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2008).

14. Fredrickson, Comparative Imagination, 81.

15. Isaac, Benjamin H., The Invention of Racism in Classical Antiquity (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004)Google Scholar.

16. Lape, Susan, Race and Citizen Identity in The Classical Athenian Democracy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar).

17. In English, see Takezawa, Yasuko, “Race Should Be Discussed and Understood Across the Globe,” Anthropology News 47 (2006): 67CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Transcending the Western Paradigm of Race,” Japanese Journal of American Studies 16 (2005): 530Google Scholar.

18. Takezawa, “Transcending the Western Paradigm,” 11.

19. Caldwell, Peter C., “When the Complexity of Lived Experience Finds Itself Before a Court of Law,” Law and History Review 29 (2011): 567–72, at 571CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20. Wertheimer, John W., Bradshaw, Jessica, Cobb, Allyson, Addison, Harper, Colhoun, E. Dudley, Diamant, Samuel, Gilbert, Andrew, Higgs, Jeffrey, and Skipper, Nicholas“The law recognizes racial instinct”: Tucker v. Blease and the Black–White Paradigm in the Jim Crow South,” Law and History Review 29 (2011): 471495CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 476. For a discussion of “complexification,” see Gross, Ariela, “Beyond Black and White”; Walter Johnson, “Inconsistency, Contradiction, and Complete Confusion: The Everyday Life of the Law of Slavery,” Law and Social Inquiry 22 (1997): 405–33Google Scholar.

21. Caldwell, “When the Complexity of Lived Experience.”

22. Gross, Ariela J., “Litigating Whiteness: Trials of Racial Determination in the Nineteenth-Century South,” Yale Law Journal 101 (1998)Google Scholar:120.

23. Woodson, Carter G., Free Negro Owners of Slaves in the United States in 1830 (Westport, CT: Negro Universities Press, 1924, reprint)Google Scholar; and Sharfstein, Daniel, “The Secret History of Race in the United States,” Yale Law Journal 112 (2003): 1473CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24. See, for example, the essays collected in Theoretical Inquiries in Law: Legal Histories of Transplantation 10:2 (2009)Google Scholar; and Benton, Lauren A., Law and Colonial Cultures: Legal Regimes in World History, 1400–1900 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002)Google Scholar.