Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T12:26:27.545Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Comfort of Denial: Metre, Cyclic Form, and Narrative in Shostakovich's Seventh String Quartet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2011

ROBERT RIVAL
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent scholarship has taken the leap from documenting cyclic form in Shostakovich's Seventh String Quartet to its interpretation. David Fanning, Judith Kuhn, and Sarah Reichardt, for instance, endorse a belief in the quartet's satisfactory closure. I propose an alternative reading that qualifies such resolution as merely apparent. I posit a musical ‘persona’ (Edward T. Cone) that achieves comfort in denial. I support my claim by analysing shifting hypermetre, metrical insertions, motif, and cyclic form, then weave my observations into a narrative interpretation. While acknowledging the limitations of the narrative analogy (following Carolyn Abbate, Lawrence Kramer, and Jean-Jacques Nattiez), I rely on its principal strength: the ability to help construct a compelling interpretation of the elusive ‘meaning’ of a piece of absolute music (Cone, Fred Maus, Anthony Newcomb, Leo Treitler). I conclude that the peculiar arrangement of shifting metrical identities and the DSCH-motto-related fragments tell a psychological story: of a musical persona's thwarted search for self.

Type
Articles
Information
Twentieth-Century Music , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , September 2009 , pp. 209 - 235
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Abbate, Carolyn. ‘What the Sorcerer Said’, in Unsung Voices. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991. 30–60.Google Scholar
Bobrovskiy, Viktor. ‘Sed’moy kvartet D. Shostakovicha' [Shostakovich's Seventh Quartet]. Sovetskaya muzïka 8 (1960), 63–69; Ger. trans. by Ernst Kuhn and Andreas Wehrmeyer, ‘Schostakowitchs Streichquartette – ein internationales Symposium’, Schostakowitch-Studien 5 (2002), 203–11.Google Scholar
Brown, Stephen C. ‘Tracing the Origins of Shostakovich's Musical Motto’. Intégral 20 (2006), 69–103.Google Scholar
Child, Peter. ‘Voice-Leading Patterns and Interval Collections in Late Shostakovich: Symphony No. 15’. Music Analysis 12/1 (1993), 71–88.Google Scholar
Cone, Edward T.The Composer's Voice. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cone, Edward T.. ‘Three Ways of Reading a Detective Story – or a Brahms Intermezzo’ (1977), reprinted in Music: A View from Delft. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989. 77–93.Google Scholar
Cone, Edward T.. ‘Schubert's Unfinished Business’. 19th-Century Music 7/3 (1984), 222–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cone, Edward T.. ‘Schubert's Promissory Note: an Exercise in Musical Hermeneutics’. 19th-Century Music 5/3 (1982), 233–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fanning, David. Shostakovich: String Quartet No. 8. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004.Google Scholar
Fay, Laurel E. ‘Shostakovich versus Volkov: Whose Testimony?’. Russian Review 39 (1980), 484–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fay, Laurel E. Shostakovich: a Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Hepokoski, James, and Warren, Darcy. Elements of Sonata Theory: Norms, Types, and Deformations in the Late-Eighteenth-Century Sonata. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 2006.Google Scholar
Hulme, Derek C. Dmitri Shostakovich: a Catalogue, Bibliography and Discography, 3rd edn. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Ibsen, Henrik. The Wild Duck (1884), trans. McFarlane, James Walter, in The Oxford Ibsen, vol. 6. 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press, 1971. 107–220.Google Scholar
Karl, Gregory. ‘Structuralism and Musical Plot’. Music Theory Spectrum 19/1 (1997), 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Jonathan D. ‘Multiple and Non-Linear Time in Beethoven's Opus 135’. Perspectives of New Music 11 (1973), 122–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Jonathan D. ‘Musical Narratology: a Theoretical Outline’. Indiana Theory Review 12 (1991), 141–162.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Judith. Shostakovich in Dialogue: Form, Imagery and Ideas in Quartets Nos. 1–7. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2010.Google Scholar
Longman, Richard M. Expression and Structure: Processes of Integration in the Large-Scale Instrumental Music of Dmitri Shostakovich. New York: Garland, 1989.Google Scholar
Mason, Colin. ‘Form in Shostakovich's Quartets’. The Musical Times 103 (1962), 531–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maus, Fred E. ‘Music as Drama’. Music Theory Spectrum 10 (1988), 56–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maus, Fred E. ‘Music as Narrative’. Indiana Theory Review 12 (1991), 1–34.Google Scholar
Maus, Fred E. ‘Narrative, Drama, and Emotion in Instrumental Music’. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 55/3 (1997), 293–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maus, Fred E. ‘Classical Instrumental Music and Narrative’, in A Companion to Narrative Theory, ed. Phelan, James and Rabinowitz, Peter J.. Oxford: Blackwell, 2005. 466–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClelland, Ryan. ‘Brahms and the Principle of Destabilised Beginnings’. Music Analysis 28/1 (2009), 3–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCreless, Patrick. ‘Music Theory and Historical Awareness’. Music Theory Online 6/3 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCreless, Patrick. ‘The Cycle of Structure and the Cycle of Meaning: the Piano Trio in E minor, Op. 67’, in Shostakovich Studies, ed. Fanning, David. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. 113–136.Google Scholar
Nattiez, Jean-Jacques. ‘Can One Speak of Narrativity in Music?’ Journal of the Royal Musical Association 115/2 (1990), 240–257.Google Scholar
Newcomb, Anthony. ‘Once More “Between Absolute and Program Music”: Schumann's Second Symphony’. 19th-Century Music 7/3 (1984), 233–250.Google Scholar
Newcomb, Anthony. ‘Schumann and Late Eighteenth-Century Narrative Strategies’. 19th-Century Music 11/2 (1987), 164–174.Google Scholar
Nikolskaya, Irina. ‘Shostakovich Remembered: Interviews with His Soviet Colleagues (1992)’, in A Shostakovich Casebook, ed. Brown, Malcolm H.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2004. 150–189.Google Scholar
O'Loughlin, Niall. ‘Shostakovich's String Quartets’. Tempo 87 (1968–9), 9–16.Google Scholar
O'Loughlin, Niall. ‘Shostakovich's String Quartets’. Musical Times 115 (1974), 744–746.Google Scholar
Reichardt, Sarah. Composing the Modern Subject: Four String Quartets by Dmitri Shostakovich. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008.Google Scholar
Roseberry, Eric. Ideology, Style, Content and Thematic Process in the Symphonies, Cello Concertos, and String Quartets of Shostakovich. New York: Garland, 1989.Google Scholar
Taruskin, Richard. ‘The Musical Mystique: Defending Classical Music against Its Devotees’. The New Republic, 22 October 2007, 34–45.Google Scholar
Treitler, Leo. ‘Mozart and the Idea of Absolute Music’, in Music and the Historical Imagination. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989. 176–214.Google Scholar
Treitler, Leo.. ‘Language and the Interpretation of Music’, in Music and Meaning, ed. Robinson, Jenefer. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997. 23–56.Google Scholar
Twain, Mark. Following the Equator (1897). New York: Dover, 1971.Google Scholar
Volkov, Solomon. Testimony: the Memoirs of Dmitri Shostakovich. New York: Harper & Row, 1979.Google Scholar