Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T13:03:16.865Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The world looks small when you only look through a telescope: The need for a broad and developmental study of reasoning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2011

Darcia Narvaez
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556. dnarvaez@nd.eduhttp://www.nd.edu/~dnarvaez

Abstract

If the target article represents the summary findings of the field, reasoning research is deeply flawed. The vision is too narrow and seems to fall into biological determinism. Humans use reasoning in effective ways apparently not studied by researchers, such as reasoning for action. Moreover, as the brain develops through adulthood and from experience so do reasoning capabilities.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bechara, A. (2005) Decision making, impulse control and loss of willpower to resist drugs: A neurocognitive perspective. Nature Neuroscience 8:1458–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fry, D. P. (2006) The human potential for peace: An anthropological challenge to assumptions about war and violence. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, E. (2001) The executive brain. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. & Norenzayan, A. (2010) The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33(2–3):6183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hogarth, R. M. (2001) Educating intuition. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Konrath, S., O'Brien, E. H. & Hsing, C. (in press) Changes in dispositional empathy over time in college students: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. C., Rose, S. & Kamin, L. J. (1987) Not in our genes: Biology, ideology, and human nature. Pantheon.Google Scholar
Luna, B., Thulborn, K. R., Munoz, D. P., Merriam, E. P., Garver, K. E., Minshew, N.J., Keshavan, M. S., Genovese, C. R., Eddy, W. F. & Sweeney, J. A. (2001) Maturation of widely distributed brain function subserves cognitive development. NeuroImage 13(5):786–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mathews, V. P., Kronenberger, W. G., Wang, Y., Lurito, J. T., Lowe, M. J. & Dunn, D. W. (2005) Media violence exposure and frontal lobe activation measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging in aggressive and nonaggressive adolescents. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 29(3):287–92.Google Scholar
Narvaez, D. (2008) Triune ethics: The neurobiological roots of our multiple moralities. New Ideas in Psychology 26:95119.Google Scholar
Narvaez, D. (2010) Moral complexity: The fatal attraction of truthiness and the importance of mature moral functioning. Perspectives on Psychological Science 5(2):163–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sahlins, M. (2008) The Western illusion of human nature. Prickly Paradigm Press.Google Scholar
Schaie, K. W. & Willis, S. L. (2010) Handbook of the psychology of aging, 7th edition. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Thoma, S. J. & Bebeau, M. (2008) Moral Judgment competency is declining over time: Evidence from 20 years of defining issues test data. Paper presented to the American Educational Research Association, New York.Google Scholar
Twenge, J. & Campbell, R. (2009) The narcissism epidemic: Living in the age of entitlement. Free Press.Google Scholar