Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T10:54:48.170Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

IS TRADITIONAL CONTRACEPTIVE USE IN MOLDOVA ASSOCIATED WITH POVERTY AND ISOLATION?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2011

MARK J. LYONS-AMOS ,
GABRIELE B. DURRANT  and
SABU S. PADMADAS
MARK J. LYONS-AMOS
Affiliation:
Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute, University of Southampton, UK Centre for Global Health, Population, Poverty & Policy, University of Southampton, UK
GABRIELE B. DURRANT
Affiliation:
Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute, University of Southampton, UK
SABU S. PADMADAS
Affiliation:
Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute, University of Southampton, UK Centre for Global Health, Population, Poverty & Policy, University of Southampton, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This study investigates the correlates of traditional contraceptive use in Moldova, a poor country in Europe with one of the highest proportions of traditional contraceptive method users. The high reliance on traditional methods, particularly in the context of sub-replacement level fertility rate, has not been systematically evaluated in demographic research. Using cross-sectional data on a sub-sample of 6039 sexually experienced women from the 2005 Moldovan Demographic and Health Survey, this study hypothesizes that (a) economic and spatial disadvantages increase the likelihood of traditional method use, and (b) high exposure to family planning/reproductive health (FP/RH) programmes increases the propensity to modern method use. Multilevel multinomial models are used to examine the correlates of traditional method use controlling for exposure to sexual activity, socioeconomic and demographic characteristics and data structure. The results show that economic disadvantage increases the probability of traditional method use, but the overall effect is small. Although higher family planning media exposure decreases the reliance on traditional methods among younger women, it has only a marginal effect in increasing modern method use among older women. Family planning programmes designed to encourage women to switch from traditional to modern methods have some success – although the effect is considerably reduced in regions outside of the capital Chisinau. The study concludes that FP/RH efforts directed towards the poorest may have limited impact, but interventions targeted at older women could reduce the burden of unwanted pregnancies and abortions. Addressing differentials in accessing modern methods could improve uptake in rural areas.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 43 , Issue 3 , May 2011 , pp. 305 - 327
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agadjanian, V. (2002) Is abortion culture fading in the Former Soviet Union? Views about abortion and contraception in Kazakhstan. Studies in Family Planning 33(3), 237–248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlson, E. & Lamb, V. (2001) Changes in contraceptive use in Bulgaria, 1995–2000. Studies in Family Planning 32(4), 329–338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christopher, E. (2006) Religious aspects of contraception. Reviews in Gynaecological and Perinatal Practice 6, 192–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comendant, R. (2005) A project to improve the quality of abortion services in Moldova. Reproductive Health Matters 13(26), 93–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Council of Europe (2004) Recent Demographic Developments in Europe. Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg. URL: http://www.coe.int/t/e/social_cohesion/population/Demo2004EN.pdf (accessed 4th May 2009).Google Scholar
Easterlin, R. A. (1979) An economic framework for fertility analysis. Studies in Family Planning 6(3), 54–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filmer, D. & Pritchett, L. H. (2001) Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data – or tears: an application to educational enrolments in states of India. Demography 38(1), 115–132.Google ScholarPubMed
Fisher, K. & Szreter, S. (2003) They prefer withdrawal: the choice of birth control in Britain, 1918–1950. Journal of Interdisciplinary History 34(2), 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldburg, H. L. & Toros, A. (1994) The use of traditional methods of contraception among Turkish couples. Studies in Family Planning 25(2), 122–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, B. R., Horga, M. & Fajans, P. (2004) A strategic assessment of abortion and contraception in Romania. Reproductive Health Matters 12(24), 184–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, K. I. & Trussel, J. (2004) Postpartum contraception and lactation in contraceptive technology. In Hatcher, R. et al. (ed.) Contraceptive Technology, 18th edition, revised. Ardent Media, New York, pp. 575–600.Google Scholar
Kohler, H-P., Behrman, J. R. & Watkins, S. C. (2001) The density of social networks and fertility decisions: evidence from South Nyanza district, Kenya. Demography 38(1), 43–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kost, K. (1993) The dynamics of contraceptive use in Peru. Studies in Family Planning 24(2), 109–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kowal, D. (2004) Coitus interruptus (withdrawal). In Hatcher, R. et al. Contraceptive Technology, 18th edition, revised. Ardent Media, New York, pp. 311–315.Google Scholar
Lindstrom, D. P. & Munoz-Franco, E. (2005) Migration and the diffusion of modern contraceptive knowledge and use in rural Guatemala. Studies in Family Planning 36(4), 277–288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacLehose, L. & McKee, M. (2002) Health Care Systems in Transition: Republic of Moldova. European Observatory on Health Care Systems, Copenhagen. URL: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/95163/e81265.pdfGoogle Scholar
Magadi, M. A. & Curtis, S. L. (2003) Trends and determinants of contraceptive method choice in Kenya. Studies in Family Planning 34(3), 149–159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montgomery, M. R. & Casterline, J. B. (1996) Social learning, social influence and new models of fertility. Population and Development Review 22 (Supplement), 151–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NCPM & ORC Macro (2006) Moldova Demographic and Health Survey 2005. National Scientific and Applied Center for Preventive Medicine of the Ministry of Health and Social Protection, Republic of Moldova, and ORC Macro Calverton, MD.Google Scholar
Nye, R. A. & van Poppel, F. (2003) Fertility and contraception during the demographic transition: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Journal of Interdisciplinary History 34(2), 141–154.Google Scholar
Pariani, S., Heer, D. M. & Van Arsdol, M. D. Jr (1991) Does choice make a difference to contraceptive use? Evidence from East Java. Studies in Family Planning 22(6), 384–390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Popov, A. A., Visser, A. Ph. & Ketting, E. (1993) Contraceptive knowledge, attitudes, and practice in Russia during the 1980s. Studies in Family Planning 24, 227–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, K. M. (1996) Education and Traditional Contraceptive Use: An Analysis of Nine Countries using Demographic and Health Survey Data. Centre for Global Initiatives, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. URL: http://cgi.unc.edu/research/pdf/contra.pdf (accessed 9th December 2008).Google Scholar
Rogow, D. & Horowitz, S. (1995) Withdrawal: a review of the literature and an agenda for research. Studies in Family Planning 26(3), 140–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santow, G. (1993) Coitus interruptus in the twentieth century. Population and Development Review 19(4), 767–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santow, G. (1995) Coitus interruptus and the control of natural fertility. Population Studies 49(1), 19–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serbanescu, F., Morris, L., Stupp, P. & Stanescu, A. (1995) The impact of recent policy changes on fertility, abortion, and contraceptive use in Romania. Studies in Family Planning 26(2), 76–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swar-Eldahab, A. M. (1993) Constraints on effective family planning in urban Sudan. Studies in Family Planning 24(6), 366–374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
United Nations (1995) Programme of Action of the International Conference on Population and DevelopmentCairo, EgyptSeptember 5–13th, 1994. In Report of the International Conference on Population and Development. UN, New York.Google Scholar
United Nations (2007) World Contraceptive Use 2007. URL: http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/contraceptive2007/contraceptive2007.htm (accessed 23rd October 2009).Google Scholar
Westoff, C. (2000) The Substitution of Contraception for Abortion in Kazakhstan in the 1990s. DHS Analytical Studies No. 1. ORC Macro, Calverton, MD.Google Scholar
Westoff, C. (2005) Recent Trends in Abortion and Contraception in 12 Countries. DHS Analytical Studies No. 8. ORC Macro, Calverton, MD.Google Scholar
World Bank (2005) Moldova: Opportunities for Accelerated Growth. A Country Economic Memorandum for the Republic of Moldova. Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Unit, Europe and Central Asia Region, World Bank. URL: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTMOLDOVA/Resources/cem05.pdf (accessed 4th May 2009).Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2004) Abortion and Contraception in Romania. A Strategic Assessment of Policy, Programme and Research Issues. World Health Organization, Geneva. URL: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/unsafe_abortion/9739953166/en/index.html (accessed 24th August 2010).Google Scholar