Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-12T17:10:53.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improved High Resolution Post-Transit Spectroscopy for Determining the Density of States in Amorphous Semiconductors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Charlie Main
Affiliation:
School of Science and Engineering, University of Abertay Dundee, Dundee DD1 1HG, UK
Steve Reynolds
Affiliation:
School of Science and Engineering, University of Abertay Dundee, Dundee DD1 1HG, UK
Rashad I. Badran
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan
Joe M. Marshall
Affiliation:
Dept of Materials Engineering, University of Wales Swansea, UK
Get access

Abstract

We show that the analysis of post-transit photocurrent i(t) in a multi-trapping context to determine the density of trapping states g(E) is capable of resolving features less than kT in width. A commonly used method uses a Laplace inversion of i(t) data giving the well-known result g(E) ∼ t i(t) but employs a delta function approximation for trap release times, which results in loss of energy resolution. We show that it is possible to retain the exponential distribution function for trap release time and solve the multi-trapping rate equations directly, giving significantly improved resolution. The analysis is performed on computer generated post-transit data for distributed and discrete traps, and compared with the earlier method and other related Fourier transform methods for determining g(E). In addition, the versatility of the new method in handling cases with either distributed traps or with discrete traps means that it can be applied to disordered materials or to crystalline materials with well-defined defect levels.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Seynhaeve, G. F., Barclay, R. P., Adriaenssens, G. J. and Marshall, J. M., Phys. Rev. B 39, 10196 (1989).Google Scholar
2. Usala, S., Adriaenssens, G. J., Öktu, Ö., Nesladek, M., Appl. Surface Science 50, 265 (1991).Google Scholar
3. Yan, B. J., Han, D. X., Adriaenssens, G. J., J. Appl. Phys. 79, 3597 (1996).Google Scholar
4. Eliat, A., Yan, B. J., Adriaenssens, G. J., Bezemer, J., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 200, 592 (1996).Google Scholar
5. Fejfar, A., Juska, G., Kocka, J., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 200, 190 (1996).Google Scholar
6. Schauer, F., Handlir, R., Nespurek, S., Advanced Materials for Optics and Electronics 7, 61 (1997).Google Scholar
7. Marshall, J. M., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 77/78, 425 (1983).Google Scholar
8. Garbow, B.S., Hillstrom, K.E. and More, J.J. Argonne Nat. Lab. MINPACK Project (1980).Google Scholar
9. Main, C., Berkin, J. and Merazga, A., in New Physical Problems in Electronic Materials, ed. Borissov, M., Kirov, N., Marshall, J. M., Vavrek, A., (World Scientific, Singapore, 1991) 55.Google Scholar
10. Main, C., in Amorphous and Microcrystalline Silicon Technology-1997, in Proc. MRS Symposium A, Vol. 467, edited by Hack, M., Schiff, E. A., Wagner, S., Matsuda, A. and Schropp, R., (MRS, Warrendale PA 1997) Ch.143, p.167.Google Scholar