Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-5xszh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-17T22:53:04.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

MAINTAINING (ENVIRONMENTAL) CAPITAL INTACT*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

EMMA ROTHSCHILD*
Affiliation:
Department of History, Harvard University, and Joint Center for History and Economics E-mail: er10005@cam.ac.uk

Extract

The idea of sustainability is an odd composite of imagination and accounting. Environmental history is a permissive historical subdiscipline, and this essay is about the environmental–economic–intellectual history of an environmental idea, sustainability, which is historical in the sense that it is very old, and historical, too, in the sense that it is an idea about history, or about imagining the future in relation to the past. One of the oddities of the last several decades is that these old ideas have been transformed into the most celebrated of all the dicta of environmental policy, or an aspiration of UN commissions, “strategy consultancies”, and very large government agencies (“sustainability is our ‘true north.’”)

Type
Forum: The Idea of Sustainability
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Sörlin, Sverker and Warde, Paul, “The Problem of the Problem of Environmental History: A Re-reading of the Field”, Environmental History 12/1 (Jan. 2007), 107–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 On the UN's “Millennium Goal” number 7, “ENSURE ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY”, see http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/environ.shtml; on “transformative business leadership on the sustainability agenda”, see http://www.sustainability.com; on the “goal of sustainability” as the true north of the US government's Environmental Protection Agency, see http://www.epa.gov/sustainability; and on the EPA's budget, see http://www.epa.gov/ocfo/budget/2011/2011bib.pdf, all accessed 2 Oct. 2010.

3 Solow, Robert M., “On the Intergenerational Allocation of Natural Resources”, Scandinavian Journal of Economics 88/1 (March 1986), 141–9, 141CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Giacomo Leopardi, “Dialogo di un folletto e di uno gnomo”, in idem, Operette Morali (Milan, 1976; first published 1827), 81–5.

5 World Commission on Environment and Development, Our Common Future (Oxford, 1987), 42.

6 Solow, “On the Intergenerational Allocation of Natural Resources”, 141.

7 Partha Dasgupta and Karl‑Goran Mäler, Poverty, Institutions, and the Environmental‑Resource Base (World Bank Environment Paper no. 9, The World Bank, 1994), 9. “The quality of the environment is part of our capital stock, just like bridges and buildings. There is every reason to treat the environment along with other capital as a relevant input in a firm's production function.” Nalebuff, Barry, “On a Clear Day, You Can See the Coase Theorem”, in Dasgupta, Partha and Mäler, Karl‑Goran, eds., The Environment and Emerging Development Issues, vol. 1 (Oxford, 1997), 3547, 38Google Scholar.

8 A. C. Pigou, in 1935, considered the possibility of including “stores of coal, minerals, oil and so on that Nature has laid up” in estimates of national or social capital; Frank Knight speculated about the future circumstances that “coal is replaced by oil or by hydraulic power, not to mention wider possibilities of substitution”. Pigou, A. C., The Economics of Stationary States (London, 1935), 22Google Scholar; Knight, Frank H., “Some Issues in the Economics of Stationary States”, American Economic Review 26/3 (Sept. 1936), 393411, 400–401Google Scholar.

9 Solow, “On the Intergenerational Allocation of Natural Resources”, 149; Goundrey, G. K., “Economics and Conservation”, Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 26/2 (May 1960), 319–25, 322CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ruggles, Richard, “Concepts, Sources, and Methods of United States National Income Accounts”, Econometrica 20/3 (July 1952), 467–71, 469CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Nordhaus, William D. and Kokkelenberg, Edward C., eds., Nature's Numbers: Expanding the U.S. National Economic Accounts to Include the Environment (Washington, DC, 1999), 183–4, 190Google Scholar.

11 Pigou, A. C., “A Parallel between Economic and Political Theory”, Economic Journal 12/46 (June 1902), 274–7, 277CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Knight, “Some Issues in the Economics of Stationary States”, 393. The word “practical” appears in forty-eight of the eighty-two articles by Pigou in the JSTOR database.

12 “Shorter Notices, ‘The Pure Theory of Capital’”, The Economist, 1 March 1941, 276.

13 Cover page, Economica new ser., 8/31 (Aug. 1941); oral communication by the late Dr Larry Hayek, conference on The Road to Serfdom, Centre for History and Economics, King's College, Cambridge, 2004; and see Melissa Lane, “Friedrich von Hayek and The Road to Serfdom: 1944–2004”, available at http://www-histecon.kings.cam.ac.uk/events/hayek_report.pdf.

14 Knight, “Some Issues in the Economics of Stationary States”, 402 n. 12.

15 On augmented accounts see Nordhaus and Kokkelenberg, Nature's Numbers, 183, 185, 188, 190.

16 A. C. Pigou, “Maintaining Capital Intact”, Economica new ser., 8/31 (Aug. 1941), 271–5.

17 F. A. v. Hayek, “Maintaining Capital Intact: A Reply”, Economica new ser., 8/31 (Aug. 1941), 276–80.

18 J. R. Hicks, “Maintaining Capital Intact: A Further Suggestion”, Economica new ser., 9/32 (May 1942), 174–9; idem, “Capital Controversies: Ancient and Modern”, American Economic Review 64/2 (May 1974), 307–16, 309, 315 n. 14; idem, Capital and Time: A Neo-Austrian Theory (Oxford, 1987), 163.

19 Hicks, John, Classics and Moderns (Cambridge, MA, 1983), 96–7Google Scholar.

20 Nordhaus, William and Tobin, James, Is Growth Obsolete?, in National Bureau of Economic Research, Economic Research: Retrospect and Prospect, Economic Growth, Fiftieth Anniversary Colloquium (New York, 1972), 24, 34Google Scholar.

21 Weitzman, Martin L., “On the Welfare Significance of National Product in a Dynamic Economy”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 90/1 (Feb. 1976), 156–62, 157CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 Solow, “On the Intergenerational Allocation of Natural Resources”, 149.

23 Nordhaus and Kokkelenberg, Nature's Numbers, 183, 185, 188, 190.

24 Hartwick, John M., “Natural Resources, National Accounting and Economic Depreciation”, Journal of Public Economics 43 (Dec. 1990), 291304, 301CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 On the UN System of National Accounts of 1993 and the System of Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting of 2002, see Searchable Archive of Publications on Environmental‑Economic Accounting, available at http://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/ceea/archive/Introduction.asp; and Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting 2003 (SEEA 2003), available at http://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/seea.asp.

26 Canberra Group on Capital Stock Statistics—November 1999 meeting, unpaginated, available at http://www.oecd.org/document/49/0,3343,en_2825_500246_1876337_1_1_1_1,00.html.

27 Glenn‑Marie Lange, “National Wealth, Natural Capital and Sustainable Development in Namibia”, DEA research discussion paper no. 56, Feb. 2003, Windhoek, Namibia, 6–8, 10; available at http://www.met.gov.na/publications/research/RDP56.pdf.

28 Rodgers, Daniel T., Contested Truths: Keywords in American Politics since Independence (Cambridge, MA, 1998), 7Google Scholar; Google search, 2 Oct. 2010. On “UN words” see Emma Rothschild, “The Archives of Universal History”, Journal of World History 19/3 (Sept. 2008), 375–401.

29 Sen, Amartya, “Why We Should Preserve the Spotted Owl”, London Review of Books 26/3 (5 Feb. 2004)Google Scholar; Gilles Paquet, “The Governance of Sustainability: A Social Learning Approach”, undated, available at http://www.invenire.ca/Res_papers/Governance_of_sustainability.pdf, accessed on Oct. 24, 2008.

30 See http://www.un.org/geninfo/bp/enviro.html, accessed 29 Oct. 2008.

31 United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development, Indicators of Sustainable Development: Guidelines and Methodologies, 3rd edn (New York, 2007), 3, 9, 40.

33 Solow, Robert M., An Almost Practical Step toward Sustainability (Washington, DC, 1992), 14Google Scholar.

34 See Rothschild, Emma, “Arcs of Ideas: International History and Intellectual History”, in Budde, Gunilla, Conrad, Sebastian and Janz, Oliver, eds., Transnationale Geschichte: Themen, Tendenzen und Theorien (Göttingen, 2006), 217–26Google Scholar.

35 Walter Bagehot, “Memoir of the Right Honourable James Wilson”, The Economist, 17 Nov. 1860, 1287–1300, 1289, original emphasis.

36 Hadley, Arthur T., “The Relation between Economics and Politics”, Yale Law Journal 8/4 (Jan. 1899), 194206, 194–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

37 Pigou, A. C., Economics in Practice: Six Lectures on Current Issues (London, 1935), 89Google Scholar.

38 Clark, J. B., “The Future of Economic Theory”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 13/1 (Oct. 1898), 114, 9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

39 As Frank Knight observed, “the relationship of theory to action is perhaps peculiarly obscure” in respect of the theory of capital and interest. F. H. Knight, “Professor Mises and the Theory of Capital”, Economica new ser., 8/32 (Nov. 1941), 409–27, 410.

40 Pigou, “Maintaining Capital Intact”, 275.

41 Pigou, A. C., The Economics of Welfare, 3rd edn (Cambridge, 1928), lxviiiGoogle Scholar.

42 A. C. Pigou, “Mr. J. M. Keynes’ General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money”, Economica new ser., 3/10 (May 1936), 115–32, 119.

43 Hicks, “Maintaining capital intact”, 179.

44 Ibid., 179.

45 Nordhaus and Kokkelenberg, Nature's Numbers, 183, 190.

46 Weitzman, “On the Welfare Significance of National Product in a Dynamic Economy”, 156–7; Nordhaus and Tobin, Is Growth Obsolete?, 14.

47 Hicks, Capital and Time, 163; Nordhaus and Kokkelenberg, Nature's Numbers.

48 Solow, “On the Intergenerational Allocation of Natural Resources”, 141, 148.

49 Nordhaus and Kokkelenberg, Nature's Numbers, 188.

50 Weitzman, “On the Welfare Significance of National Product in a Dynamic Economy”, 156–7; idem, “Shiftable versus Non‑shiftable Capital: A Synthesis”, Econometrica 39/3 (May 1971), 511–28, 516.

51 Daily, Gretchen C., Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems (Washington, DC, 1997), 2Google Scholar.

52 Marx, Karl, Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, trans. Moore, Samuel and Aveling, Edward, vol. 1 (London, 1970; first published 1887), 72Google Scholar. “It is as though light of a particular hue were cast upon everything, tingeing all other colours and modifying their special features .–.–. Capital is the economic power that dominates everything in bourgeois society.” “Introduction to a Critique of Political Economy”, in Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich, The German Ideology, ed. Arthur, C. J. (New York, 1978), 146–7Google Scholar.

53 Keynes, J. M., The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (New York, 1964; first published 1936), 278–9Google Scholar.

54 Knight, F. H., “Some Fallacies in the Interpretation of Social Cost”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 38/4 (Aug. 1924), 582606, 606CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

55 If the services of heterogeneous capital goods are aggregated on the basis of the “cost of capital”, then the cost incorporates expectations about the future. See Jorgenson, Dale W., “Information Technology and the U.S. Economy”, American Economic Review 91/1 (March 2001), 132CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

56 Coase, R. H., “The Problem of Social Cost”, Journal of Law and Economics 3 (Oct. 1960), 144, 44CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and see R. H. Coase and R. F. Fowler, “The Pig-Cycle in Great Britain: An Explanation”, Economica new ser., 4/13 (Feb. 1937), 55–82, 80.

57 “Imagine for a moment that a dream team of world-class researchers is asked to analyze the important question of the impact on future living standards of the exhaustion of finite petroleum stocks”. The report's conclusion was that in spite of a “large budget”, and a “massive, dynamic, computable” model, the “dream research team” would be less credible than “the market's estimate”. Nordhaus and Kokkelenberg, Nature's Numbers, 194, 196.

58 On the environment and property rights which are of interest in more than one nation, see Nalebuff, “On a Clear Day, You Can See the Coase Theorem”, 35, 44–6.

59 Hayek, “Maintaining Capital Intact: A Reply”, 279; idem, “Scientism and the Study of Society”, Economica new series, 9/35 (Aug. 1942), 268–9; idem “Scientism and the Study of Society, Part II”, Economica new series, 10/37 (Feb. 1943), 34–63, 40–41, 47, 57; “Scientism and the Study of Society, Part III”, Economica new series, 11/41 (Feb. 1944), 27–39, 31.

60 Hayek, F. A., “The Use of Knowledge in Society”, American Economic Review 35/4 (Sept. 1945), 519–30, 521Google Scholar.

61 It would “reveal, in addition to the durable wealth . . . trainloads of meat, eggs and milk in transit . . . Even the supplies on the table of a man bolting his dinner would find a place”. Irving Fisher, “Senses of ‘Capital’”, Economic Journal 7/26 (June 1897), 199–213, 19.

62 Solow, “On the Intergenerational Allocation of Natural Resources”.

63 As in Hegel's description of the “museum” of science: “What results from this method of labelling all that is in heaven and earth . . . is nothing less than ‘a report as clear as noonday’ on the universe as an organism, viz. a synoptic table like a skeleton with scraps of paper stuck all over it, or like the rows of closed and labelled boxes in a grocer's stall”. Hegel, G. W. F., Phenomenology of Spirit (1807), trans. Miller, A. V. (Oxford: Oxford, 1977), 31Google Scholar.

64 “It is not profitable to embark on the fine analysis of a definition unless we have decided on the purpose for which the definition is wanted.” Hicks, “Maintaining Capital Intact: A Further Suggestion”, 175.

65 Hayek, “Maintaining Capital Intact: A Reply”, 279.

66 Buchanan, James, “The Coase Theorem and the Theory of the State”, Natural Resources Journal 13/4 (Oct. 1973), 579–94Google Scholar.

67 Samuelson, Paul A., “The Evaluation of ‘Social Income’: Capital Formation and Wealth”, in The Collected Scientific Papers of Paul A. Samuelson, vol. 1 (Cambridge, MA, 1966), 292324, 303Google Scholar.

68 Buchanan, “The Coase Theorem and the Theory of the State”, 579.

69 Stone, Richard, The Role of Measurement in Economics (Cambridge, 1951), 43, 56Google Scholar; US Department of Commerce, National Income (Washington, DC, 1954), 38.

70 Pigou, The Economics of Welfare, 129; Hayek, F. A., The Road to Serfdom (Chicago, 1972; first published 1944), 75Google Scholar; Hayek, “The Use of Knowledge in Society”, 527.

71 Rosenberg, Charles E., Our Present Complaint: American Medicine, Then and Now (Baltimore, 2007), 186Google Scholar.

72 Dasgupta, Partha, “Nature and the Economy”, Journal of Applied Ecology 44/3 (June 2007), 475–87, 487CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

73 On the politics of energy and climate change, see Chakrabarty, Dipesh, “The Climate of History: Four Theses”, Critical Inquiry 35 (Winter 2009), 197222CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Mitchell, Timothy, “Carbon Democracy”, Economy and Society 38/3 (Aug. 2009), 399432CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

74 CONFERENCE REPORT ON 4603 (House of Representatives—August 16, 1994), TITLE II—DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Amendment No. 69, sponsored by Rep. Alan B. Mollohan (Dem., W.Va): “The conferees understand that there has been considerable debate over the years as to the objectivity, methodology, and applicability of ‘Integrated Environmental–Economic Accounting’ or ‘Green GDP’ . . . The conferees expect BEA to suspend development of Phase II of this initiative.” Library of Congress, http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?r103:1:./temp/~r103YsjkSe:e116248; and see http://www.house.gov/mollohan/bio.htm, accessed 30 Oct. 2008.

75 On liberalism and conservatism in the economic thought of the 1930s and 1940s see Burgin, Angus, “The Radical Conservatism of Frank H. Knight”, MIH 6/3 (Nov. 2009), 513–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

76 On the “libertarian paternalism” of the nudge, in which the efficient operation of institutions designed by well-informed “choice architects” is propitious “not for bigger government, just for better governance”, and in which “it helps to think about the environment as the outcome of a global choice architecture system”, see Thaler, Richard H. and Sunstein, Cass R., Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness (New Haven, 2008), 1114, 185Google Scholar. The sinister-sounding Bureau of Environmental Value would be more libertarian and less paternalistic, in these terms, to the extent that it disclosed the information on the basis of which it arrived at its large green numbers.

77 Demos, John, “Foreword”, in Cronon, William, Changes in the Land: Indians, Colonists, and the Ecology of New England, rev. edn (New York, 2003), xiiiGoogle Scholar.