Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T01:36:08.955Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nuclear Waste Analytical Round Robins 1-6 Summary Report

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Gary L. Smith
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, RicЫand, Washington 99352
Steven C. Marschman
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, RicЫand, Washington 99352
Get access

Abstract

The Materials Characterization Center (MCC) at Pacific Northwest Laboratory(a) conducts Nuclear Waste Analytical Round Robins on simulated waste glasses with and without radionuclides. The analytical round robins are used to provide analytical laboratories with a forum for improving the accuracy and precision of analytical techniques that will be used for characterizing nuclear waste glasses. Chemical analysis data on glass waste forms produced by the nuclear waste community may need to withstand legal challenges for waste material storage qualification and for licensing repositories. Determining the quality of analytical data is important for meeting these challenges, making process operation decisions, and predicting long-term waste behavior.

The MCC has conducted six round robins for the waste management, research, and development community from 1987 to the present time. The laboratories that have participated regularly are Ames, Argonne, Catholic University, Lawrence Livermore, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Savannah River, and West Valley Nuclear. The glass types analyzed in these round robins all have been simulated nuclear waste compositions expected from the vitrification of high-level nuclear waste. A wide range of analytical procedures have been used by the participating laboratories, including Atomic Absorption spectroscopy, inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectro-scopy, direct current plasma-emission spectroscopy, and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectroscopy techniques. The consensus average relative error for Round Robins 1 through 6 is 5.4%, with values ranging from 9.4 to 1.1%. The trend on the average improved with each round robin. When the laboratories analyzed samples over longer periods of time, the intralaboratory variability increased. Lab-to-lab variation accounts for most of the total variability found in all the round robins. To date, participation in the radiochemistry portion has been minimal and the analytical results poor when compared to the nonradiochemistry portion of the round robins. Additional radiochemical work is needed in future round robins.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Goheen, S. C, McCulloch, M., Thomas, B. L., Riley, R. G., Sklarew, D. S., Mong, G. M., and Fadeff, S. K.. 1993. DOE Methods for Evaluating Environmental and Waste Management Samples. DOE/EM-0089T, Rev 1, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.Google Scholar
2 Maupin, G. D., Bowen, W. M., and Daniel, J. L.. 1988. Fabrication and Characterization of MCC Approved Testing Material-ATM-WV/205 Glass. PNL-5577-WV/205, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.Google Scholar
3 Mellinger, G. B., and Daniel, J. L.. 1984. Approved Reference and Testing Materials for Use in Nuclear Waste Management Research and Development Programs. PNL-4955-2, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.CrossRefGoogle Scholar