Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T03:03:56.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stability of Sulfide Passivated Gallium Arsenide Surfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

J. S. Solomon ,
L. Petry  and
S. R. Smith
J. S. Solomon
Affiliation:
University of Dayton Research Institute, Dayton, OH 45469-0167
L. Petry
Affiliation:
University of Dayton Research Institute, Dayton, OH 45469-0167
S. R. Smith
Affiliation:
University of Dayton Research Institute, Dayton, OH 45469-0167
Get access

Abstract

The chemical state of (NH4)2S treated (100)GaAs surfaces exposed to ambient conditions for several days was correlated with barrier height measurements. Surface chemistry was characterized by Auger electron spectroscopy and barrier heights were calculated from C-V measurements obtained with a Hg probe. Results show that surfaces are chemically and electrically unstable for several hours following the sulfide treatment. The chemical and electrical states continually changed during ambient exposure up to 300 hours. Although strictly speaking, the surfaces were not passivated, the presence of sulfur did inhibit the formation of Ga and As oxides and the incorporation of carbon. In addition, stable, low barrier heights were observed after ambient exposure for several hours. Barrier heights from C-V measurements using deposited Au and Al contacts were compared to the barrier heights obtained with a Hg probe.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 318: Symposium Ca – Interface Control of Electrical, Chemical, and Mechanical Properties , 1993 , 237
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Yablonovitch, E., Candoff, C. J., Bhat, R., and Gmitter, T., Appl. Phys. Lett., 51, 439 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Jia-Fa, Fan, Yasuhi, Kurata, and Yasuo, Nanichi, Jap. J. Appl. Phys., 28, L22551 (1989).Google Scholar
3 Sandroff, C. J., Hegde, M. S., Farow, L. A,., Chang, C. C., and Harbison, J. P., Appl. Phys. Lett, 54., 362 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Haruhiro, Oigawa, Jia-Fa, Fan, Yasuo, Nannichi, Koji, Ando, Koichiro, Saiki, and Atsushi, Koma, Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 28, L340 (1989).Google Scholar
5 Hirohiko, Sugahara and Masaharu, Oshima, J. Appl. Phys., 69, 4349 (1991).Google Scholar
6 Lu, Z. H., Graham, M. J., Feng, X. H., and Yang, B. X., Appl. Phys. Lett., 62, 2932 (1993).Google Scholar
7 Hiroyama, , Yoshihige, Matsumoto, Haruhiro, Oigawa, and Yosuo, Nannichi, Appl., Phys, Lett., 54, 2565 (1989).Google Scholar
8 Yota, J. and Burrows, V. A., J. Vac. Sci. and Technol., A11, 1083 (1993).Google Scholar
9 Green, A. M. and Spicer, W. E., J. Vac. Sci. and Technol., A11, 1061 (1993).Google Scholar
10 Robinson, Gary Y., in Physics and Chemistry of III-V Compound Semiconductor Interfaces, edited by Wilmsen, C. W. (Plenum Press, New York, 1985)p 106.Google Scholar
11 Williams, R. H., Contemp. Phys., 23, 329 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar