Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:53:43.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Smectite Illitization on Transport of Actinides Through Engineered Barriers of HLW Repositories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Joonhong Ahn
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Engineering, Tokai University, 1117 Kitakaname, Hiratsuka. Kanagawa, 259–12, Japan
S. Nagasaki
Affiliation:
Department of Quantum Engineering and Systems Science, The University of Tokyo, 7–3–1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113, Japan
S. Tanaka
Affiliation:
Department of Quantum Engineering and Systems Science, The University of Tokyo, 7–3–1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113, Japan
A. Suzuki
Affiliation:
Department of Quantum Engineering and Systems Science, The University of Tokyo, 7–3–1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Effect of smectite illitization on mass release rate from the bentonite-filled buffer of the engineered barriers is analyzed based on experimental results of sorption of americium and neptunium onto illite-smectite mixtures, and on mathematical models for smectite illitization by K+ diffusion, water flow through the engineered barriers, waste glass dissolution, and transport of americium and neptunium including solubility sharing with two major americium isotopes and moving boundary effect of the neptunium precipitation region. Numerical results for mass release rates of americium and neptunium as well as time-dependent pore velocity and glass dissolution rate are shown. Illitization effect is negligible with parameter values assumed here.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Altaner, S. P., Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 53, 923 (1989).Google Scholar
2. Felmy, A. R., Rai, D., and Fulton, R. W., Radiochim. Acta 50, 193 (1990).Google Scholar
3. Pratopo, M. I., Moriyama, H., and Higashi, K., Radiochim. Acta 51, 27 (1990).Google Scholar
4. Lieser, K. H. and Hill, R., Radiochim. Acta 56, 141 (1992).Google Scholar
5. Ticknor, K. V. and Ruegger, B., A Guide to the NEA’s Sorption Data Base, Version 2.0, OECD/NEA(1989)Google Scholar
6. Pratopo, M. I., et al., J. Nucl. Technol. 30, 560 (1993).Google Scholar
7. Chambrd, P. L., Kang, C. H., and Pigford, T. H., Trans. Am. Nuc. Soc. 52, 77 (1986).Google Scholar
8. Ohe, T., Tsukamoto, M., Kinoshita, M., and Inoue, T., Waste Management 11, 191 (1991)Google Scholar
9. Ahn, J., et al., J. Atom. Energy Soc. Japan, to be appeared in 36 (1), (1994).Google Scholar
10. Ahn, J. and Suzuki, A., Nucl. Technol. 101, 79 (1993).Google Scholar