Utilitas

Research Article

Reply to Crisp

MICHAEL OTSUKAa1 and ALEX VOORHOEVEa2

a1 University College London m.otsuka@ucl.ac.uk

a2 London School of Economics a.e.voorhoeve@lse.ac.uk

We are grateful for, but unconvinced by, Roger Crisp's defence of the Priority View against our critique. In this reply, we show that Crisp fails to grapple with, much less defeat, the central claim of our critique. We also show that an example that Crisp offers in support of the Priority View in fact lends support to our critique of that view.

(Online publication February 15 2011)