Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T23:07:49.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Oriented Growth of Thin Films of Samarium Oxide by MOCVD

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

K. Shalini
Affiliation:
Materials Research Centre, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore – 560 012, India.
S. A. Shivashankar
Affiliation:
Materials Research Centre, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore – 560 012, India.
Get access

Abstract

Thin films of samarium oxide, Sm2O3, have been grown on Si(100) and fused quartz by low-pressure MOCVD using an adducted β-diketonate precursor developed in house. It is found that the nature of the film grown is strongly dependent on substrate temperature. As examined by X-ray diffraction, the films of Sm2O3 grown at lower temperatures (∼550°C) on fused quartz are cubic and display a random grain orientation, while they become highly oriented in the (111) direction as the growth temperature is increased (to 625°C). On Si(100), highly oriented films of cubic Sm2O3 are obtained at a substrate temperature of 625°C. When the growth temperature is raised, the phase changes to monoclinic. The morphology of the films grown on both quartz and Si(100) substrates has been studied by scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy. The growth of strongly oriented Sm2O3 on the disordered surface of fused quartz may be interpreted as being driven by the minimization of surface energy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Rozhkov, V.A., Trusova, A.Yu., Berezhnoy, I.G., Thin Solid Films 325, 151 (1998).Google Scholar
2. Hong, M., Kwo, J., Kortan, A.R., Mannaerts, J.P., Sergent, A.M., Science 283, 1897 (1999).Google Scholar
3. Hogerheide, M.P., Boersma, J., van Koten, G., Coord. Chem. Rev. 155, 87 (1996).Google Scholar
4. Berry, A.D., Holm, R.T., Fatemi, M., Gaskill, D.K., J. Mater. Res. 5, 1169 (1990).Google Scholar
5. Mehrotra, R.C., Bohra, R., and Gaur, D.P., “Metal β-diketonates and Allied DerivativesAcademic, New York, 1978.Google Scholar
6. Drake, S.R., Lyons, A., Otway, D.J., Slawin, A.M.Z., Williams, D.J., J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2379 (1993).Google Scholar
7. Drake, S.R., Hursthouse, M.B., Malik, K.M.A., Miller, S.A.S., Otway, D.J., Inorg. Chem. 32, 4464 (1993).Google Scholar
8. Bradley, D.C., Chudzynska, H., Hursthouse, M.B., Motevalli, M., Polyhedron 13, 7 (1994).Google Scholar
9. Baxter, I., Drake, S.R., Hursthouse, M.B., Abdul Malik, K.M., McAleese, J., Otway, D.J., Plakatouras, J.C., Inorg. Chem. 34, 1384 (1995).Google Scholar
10. Belot, J.A., Wang, A., McNeely, R.J., Liable-Sands, L., Rheingold, A.L., Marks, T.J., Chem. Vap. Deposition 5, 65 (1999).Google Scholar
11. Bauer, E., in Trans. 9th Vac. Sym. AVS, edited by Bancroft, G.M. (Macmillan, New York, 1962), p. 35.Google Scholar