Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T08:28:10.157Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aiming at self-deception: Deflationism, intentionalism, and biological purpose

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2011

David Livingstone Smith
David Livingstone Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of New England, Biddeford, ME 04005. dsmith@une.eduhttp://realhumanature.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Deflationists about self-deception understand self-deception as the outcome of biased information processing, but in doing so, they lose the normative distinction between self-deception and wishful thinking. Von Hippel & Trivers (VH&T) advocate a deflationist approach, but they also want preserve the purposive character of self-deception. A biologically realistic analysis of deception can eliminate the contradiction implicit in their position.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , February 2011 , pp. 37 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Mele, A. R. (2001) Self-deception unmasked. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Millikan, R. G. (1984) Language, thought and other biological categories. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millikan, R. G. (1993) White queen psychology and other essays for Alice. MIT Press.Google Scholar