Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T15:57:38.683Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adhesion Strength and Peeling Angle Measured on the Polyimide/Cr Interfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Jin-Won Choi ,
Kwang-Eung Lee  and
Tae-Sung Oh
Jin-Won Choi
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical Engineering and Materials Science, Hong Ik University, Seoul 121–791, Korea
Kwang-Eung Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical Engineering and Materials Science, Hong Ik University, Seoul 121–791, Korea
Tae-Sung Oh
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical Engineering and Materials Science, Hong Ik University, Seoul 121–791, Korea
Get access

Abstract

Adhesion strength of polyimide/Cr interfaces was measured using T-peel test on polyimide/Cr/Cu structures fabricated on BPDA-PDA polyimide, and correlation between adhesion strength and peeling angle has been investigated. Adhesion strength of BPDA-PDA/Cr interface decreased with increasing the thickness of Cr/Cu metal films to a critical value, and then increased with further increasing metal film thickness. When the thickness of Cr/Cu metal films was below a critical value, plastic bending of metal films mainly occurred during T-peel test. With metal films thicker than a critical thickness, however, plastic bending of polyimide film has been observed. A critical thickness of metal film, where transition from metal bending to polyimide bending occured, became thinner with decreasing the yield strength of metal film and increasing thickness of polyimide substrate. Without depending on the plastic bending of metal film or polyimide substrate, adhesion strength increased with increasing the peeling angle during T-peel test.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 629: Symposium FF – Interfaces, Adhesion and Processing in Polymer Systems , 2000 , FF5.10
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Tummala, R. R. and Rymaszewski, E. J. (Eds.), Microelectronics Packaging Handbook, p. 673, VNR, New York (1989).Google Scholar
2. Chao, C. C., Scholz, K. S., Leibovitz, J., Cobarruviaz, M., and Chung, C. C., IEEE Trans. Comp. Hybrids Manuf. Technol., 12, 180 (1989).Google Scholar
3. Ho, C. W., Chance, D. A., Bajorek, C. H., and Acosta, R. E., IBM J. Res. Develop., 26, 286 (1982).Google Scholar
4. Doane, D. A. and Franzon, P. D., Multichip Module Technologies and Alternatives, p. 403, VNR, New York (1993).Google Scholar
5. Lau, J. H., Handbook of Tape Automated Bonding, p. 1, VNR, New York (1992).Google Scholar
6. Jeong, H. S. and White, R. C., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A11, 1373 (1993).Google Scholar
7. Kim, J., Kowalczyk, S. P., Kim, Y. H., Chou, N. J., and Oh, T. S., Proc. Mat. Res. Soc. Symp., 167, 137 (1990).Google Scholar
8. Kim, K. S. and Kim, J., J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 110, 266 (1988).Google Scholar
9. Kim, J., Kim, K. S., and Kim, Y-H., J. Adhesion Sci. Technol., 3, 175 (1989).Google Scholar
10. Evans, A. G. and Faber, K. T., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 67, 250 (1984).Google Scholar
11. Oh, T. S., Rodel, J., Cannon, R. M., and Ritchie, R. O., Acta Metall., 36, 2083 (1988).Google Scholar
12. Gent, A. N. and Hamed, G. R., J. Appl. Polymer Sci., 21, 2817 (1977).Google Scholar