Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-7qhmt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T15:09:00.452Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Mössbauer Study of Iron in Vitrified Wastes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Oliver M. Hannant
Affiliation:
Immobilisation Science Laboratory, Department of Engineering Materials, University of Sheffield, Mappin Street, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK
Paul A. Bingham
Affiliation:
Immobilisation Science Laboratory, Department of Engineering Materials, University of Sheffield, Mappin Street, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK
Russell J. Hand
Affiliation:
Immobilisation Science Laboratory, Department of Engineering Materials, University of Sheffield, Mappin Street, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK
Sue D. Forder
Affiliation:
Materials and Engineering Research Institute, Sheffield Hallam University, Howard Street, Sheffield, S1 1WB, UK
Get access

Abstract

57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy has been used to study the environment and oxidation state of iron in a series of vitrified sewage sludge ash (SSA) wastes, which are broadly similar in composition and variability to some intermediate-level legacy wastes (ILLW). The SSA wastes studied here are incapable of forming an homogeneous glass when melted at 1450 °C although increasing additions of CaO reduce the crystalline content, which consists of Ca3(PO4)2 and Ca3Mg3(PO4)4. Bulk glass transition temperatures of 670–850 °C have been measured, the value decreasing with increasing CaO content. Tetrahedrally coordinated Fe3+ appears to exist in vitrified SSA only at high CaO contents (> ∼ 29 mol. %) and whilst broadly similar to our previous results for simulated vitrified SSA, behavioural differences have been noted between fitted Mossbauer parameters for real and simulated vitrified SSA. We suggest that these could be attributable to the buffering action of carbon and other reducing agents in the real SSA wastes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Donald, I.W., Metcalfe, B.L. and Taylor, R.N.J., J. Mater. Sci. 32, 5851 (1997).Google Scholar
2 Bingham, P.A. and Hand, R.J., J. Appl. Ceram. 100, 120 (2001).Google Scholar
5 Mysen, B.O., Virgo, D. and Seifert, F.A., Amer. Mineral. 69, 834 (1984).Google Scholar
6 Volf, M. B., Chemical Approach to Glass, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1984.Google Scholar
7 Dyar, M. D., Amer. Mineral. 70, 304 (1985).Google Scholar
8 Tomandl, G., in Glass: Science and Technology, 4B Ed. Uhlmann, D.R., Kreidl, N.J., Academic Press, New York, 1990, ch. 5.Google Scholar
9 RECOIL v.1.05, Intelligent Scientific Applications Inc., Ottowa, Canada.Google Scholar
10 Kilcoyne, S.H., Greig, D. and Gona, M.N., Hyperfine Interact. 165, 167 (2005).Google Scholar
11 Duffy, J. A., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 297 (2002). 275.Google Scholar
12 Rüssel, C. and Wiedenroth, A., Chem. Geol. 213, 125 (2004).Google Scholar
13 Antoni, E., Montagne, L., Daviero, S., Palavit, G., Bernard, J. L., Wattiaux, A. and Vezin, H., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 345&346, 66 (2004).Google Scholar
14 Hannant, O.M., Bingham, P.A., Forder, S.D. and Hand, R.J., Phys. Chem. Glasses: Eur. J. Glass Sci. Technol. B 48 (2007). (in press).Google Scholar
15 Hannant, O.M., Bingham, P.A., Forder, S.D. and Hand, R.J., Proc. XXIst Int. Congr. Glass, Strasbourg, France (2007), CD-ROM paper U30.Google Scholar
16 Merino, I., Arevalo, L.F. and Romero, F., Waste Man. 25, 1046 (2005).Google Scholar