Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ph5wq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-26T19:22:07.671Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Formation of Self-Assembled Nanowire Arrays on Ge(001): a DFT Study of Pt Induced Nanowire Arrays

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Danny Eric Paul Vanpoucke
Affiliation:
dannyvanpoucke@scholarone.net, University of Twente, Faculty of Science and Technology, Computational Materials Science, Enschede, Overijsel, Netherlands
Geert Brocks
Affiliation:
G.L.H.A.Brocks@tnw.utwente.nl, University of Twente, Faculty of Science and Technology, Computational Materials Science, Enschede, Overijsel, Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

Nanowire (NW) arrays form spontaneously after high temperature annealing of a sub monolayer deposition of Pt on a Ge(001) surface. These NWs are a single atom wide, with a length limited only by the underlying beta-terrace to which they are uniquely connected. Using ab-initio density functional theory (DFT) calculations we study possible geometries of the NWs and substrate. Direct comparison to experiment is made via calculated scanning tunneling microscope (STM) images. Based on these images, geometries for the beta-terrace and the NWs are identified, and a formation path for the nanowires as function of increasing local Pt density is presented. We show the beta-terrace to be a dimer row surface reconstruction with a checkerboard pattern of Ge-Ge and Pt-Ge dimers. Most remarkably, comparison of calculated to experimental STM images shows the NWs to consist of germanium atoms embedded in the Pt-lined troughs of the underlying surface, contrary to what was assumed previously in experiments.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Gürlü, O., Adam, O. A. O., Zandvliet, H. J. W. and Poelsema, B., Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 4610 (2003).Google Scholar
2 Oncel, N., Houselt, A. van, Huijben, J., Hallback, A. S., Gürlü, O., Zandvliet, H. J. W. and Poelsema, B., Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 116801 (2005).Google Scholar
3 Blöchl, P. E., Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994)Google Scholar
4 Kresse, G. and Joubert, D., Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999)Google Scholar
5 Kresse, G. and Hafner, J., Phys. Rev. B 47, (R)558 (1993)Google Scholar
6 Kresse, G. and Furthmüller, J., Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996)Google Scholar
7 Tersoff, J. and Hamann, D. R., Phys. Rev. B 31, 805 (1985)Google Scholar
8HIVE program, http://cmsdata.tnw.utwente.nl/̃danny/hive.htmlGoogle Scholar
9 Zandvliet, H. J. W., Private communication.Google Scholar
10 Fischer, M., Houselt, A. van, Kockmann, D., Poelsema, B. and Zandvliet, H. J. W., Phys. Rev. B 76, 245429 (2007)Google Scholar