Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T02:36:57.234Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Creep characteristics of alumina, nickel aluminate spinel, zirconia composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

R. Peter Dillon
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine, Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Irvine, California 92697-2575
Dong-Kyu Kim
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Urbana, Illinois 61801
Joy E. Trujillo
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine, Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Irvine, California 92697-2575
Waltraud M. Kriven
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Urbana, Illinois 61801
Martha L. Mecartney*
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine, Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Irvine, California 92697-2575
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: martham@uci.edu
Get access

Abstract

Fine grained, three-phase ceramic composites that exhibit favorable toughness, hardness, and high room-temperature strength were evaluated for high-temperature mechanical stability. A 50vol%Al2O3–25vol%NiAl2O4–25vol%3 mol%yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (3Y–TZP) and a 33vol%Al2O3–33vol%NiAl2O4–33vol%3Y-TZP composite were compression creep tested at temperatures between 1350 and 1450 °C under constant stresses of 20–45 MPa. The three-phase microstructure effectively limited grain growth (average d0 = 1.3 μm, average df = 1.6 μm after 65% true strain). True strain rates were 10−4 to 10−6 s−1 with stress exponents n = 1.7 to 1.8 and a grain-size exponent p = 1.3. A method for compensating for grain growth is presented using stress jump tests. The apparent activation energy for high-temperature deformation for 50vol%Al2O3–25vol%NiAl2O4–25vol%3Y–TZP was found to be 373 kJ/mol-K.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Dudzinski, D., Devillez, A., Moufki, A., Larrouquere, D., Zerrouki, V., Vigneau, J.: A review of developments towards dry and high speed machining of Inconel 718 alloy. Int. J. Machine Tools Manufact. 44, 439 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Cain, M.Morrell, R.: Nanostructured ceramics: A review of their potential. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 15, 321 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Arunachalam, R.Mannan, M.A.: Machinability of nickel-based high temperature alloys. Mach. Sci. Technol. 4, 127 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Rice, R.W.: Ceramic tensile strength-grain size relations: Grain sizes, slopes, and branch intersections. J. Mater. Sci. 32, 1673 1997Google Scholar
5Lange, F.F.: Powder processing science and technology for increased reliability. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 72, 3 1989Google Scholar
6Krell, A.: A new look at grain size and load effects in the hardness of ceramics. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 245, 277 1998Google Scholar
7Rice, R.W.: Microstructural dependence of fracture energy and toughness of ceramics and ceramic composites versus that of their tensile strengths at 22 °C. J. Mater. Sci. 31, 4503 1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Smith, C.S.: Grains, phases, and interfaces: An interpretation of microstructure. Trans. Am. Inst. Mining Metall. Eng. 175, 15 1948Google Scholar
9Lee, S.J.Kriven, W.M. A submicron-scale duplex zirconia and alumina composite by polymer complexation processing.Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc.,20, 69 1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Kim, D.K.Kriven, W.M.: Processing and characterization of multi-phase ceramic composites: Part I. Duplex composites formed in-situ. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. (in press, 2007)Google Scholar
11Kim, D.K.Kriven, W.M.: Processing and characterization of multi-phase ceramic composites: Part II. Triplex composites with a wide sintering temperature range. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. (in press, 2007)Google Scholar
12Kim, D.K.Kriven, W.M.: Processing and characterization of multi-phase ceramic composites: Part III. Strong, hard and tough, high temperature, quadruplex and quintuplex composites. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. (in press, 2007)Google Scholar
13Chen, T.Mecartney, M.L.: Comparison of the high-temperature deformation of alumina-zirconia and alumina-zirconia-mullite composites. J. Mater. Res. 20, 13 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Kim, B.N., Hiraga, K., Morita, K.Sakka, Y.: A high-strain-rate superplastic ceramic. Nature 413, 288 2001Google Scholar
15Chen, T.Mecartney, M.L.: A high-strain-rate alumina-based ceramic composite. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 88, 1004 2005Google Scholar
16Gülgün, M.A., Nguyen, M.H.Kriven, W.M.: Polymerized organic-inorganic synthesis of mixed oxides. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 82, 556 1999Google Scholar
17Nguyen, M.H., Lee, S.J.Kriven, W.M.: Synthesis of oxide powders by way of a polymeric steric entrapment precursor route. J. Mater. Res. 14, 3417 1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Gülgün, M.A., Kriven, W.M.Nguyen, M.H. Processes for preparing mixed-oxide powders. U.S. Patent No. 6482387, November 19, 2002Google Scholar
19Thompson, A.W.: Calculation of true volume grain diameter. Metallography 5, 366 1972Google Scholar
20Chokshi, A.H.Porter, J.R.: Analysis of concurrent grain growth during creep of polycrystalline alumina. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 69, C37 1986Google Scholar
21Rosenblatt, J.: Independent two-sample Student t tests in Basic Statistical Methods and Models for the Sciences Chapman & Hall/CRC Boca Raton, FL 2002 195Google Scholar
22Owen, D.M.Chokshi, A.H.: The constant stress tensile creep-behavior of a superplastic zirconia-alumina composite. J. Mater. Sci. 29, 5467 1994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23de Arellano-Lopez, A.R., Melendez-Martinez, J.J., Cruse, T.A., Koritala, R.E., Routbort, J.L.Goretta, K.C.: Compressive creep of mullite containing Y2O3. Acta Mater. 50, 4325 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Venkatachari, K.R.Raj, R.: Superplastic flow in fine-grained alumina. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 69, 135 1986Google Scholar
25Kim, B.N., Hiraga, K., Morita, K., Sakka, Y.Yamada, T.: Enhanced tensile ductility in ZrO2-Al2O3-spinel composite ceramic. Scripta Mater. 47, 775 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Xue, L.A.Chen, I.W.: Deformation and grain-growth of low-temperature-sintered high-purity alumina. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73, 3518 1990Google Scholar
27Chen, T.D.Mecartney, M.L.: Superplastic compression, microstructural analysis and mechanical properties of a fine grain three-phase alumina-zirconia-mullite ceramic composite. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 410, 134 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28Ashby, M.F.Verrall, R.A.: Diffusion-accommodated flow and superplasticity. Acta Metall. 21, 149 1973Google Scholar
29Bernard-Granger, G., Guizard, C.Duclos, R.: Compressive creep behavior in air of a slightly porous as-sintered polycrystalline α-alumina material. J. Mater. Sci. 42, 2807 2007Google Scholar
30Kim, B-N., Hiraga, K., Sakka, Y.Ahn, B-W.: A grain-boundary diffusion model of dynamic grain growth during superplastic deformation. Acta Mater. 47, 3433 1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31Kottada, R.S.Chokshi, A.H.: The high temperature tensile and compressive deformation characteristics of magnesia doped alumina. Acta Mater. 48, 3905 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32Wang, Z.C., Davies, T.J.Ridley, N.: Net shape fabrication of ceramic specimens for superplastic tensile testing. Scripta Metall. Mater. 28, 301 1993Google Scholar
33French, J.D., Zhao, J.H., Harmer, M.P., Chan, H.M.Miller, G.A.: Creep of duplex microstructures. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 77, 2857 1994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34Oishi, Y., Ando, K.Sakka, Y.: Lattice and grain boundary diffusion coefficients of cations in stabilized zirconias in Advances in Ceramics, Vol. 7 edited by M.F. Yan and A.H. Heuer The American Ceramic Society Columbus, OH 1983 208Google Scholar