Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T21:28:03.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The interaction of entrepreneurship and institutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2010

MAGNUS HENREKSON  and
TINO SANANDAJI
MAGNUS HENREKSON*
Affiliation:
Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN), Stockholm, Sweden
TINO SANANDAJI*
Affiliation:
Harris School of Public Policy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN), Stockholm, Sweden
*
*Email: magnus.henrekson@ifn.se
**Email: tino@uchicago.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Previous research, notably Baumol (1990), has highlighted the role of institutions in channeling entrepreneurial supply into productive, unproductive, or destructive activities. However, entrepreneurship is not only influenced by institutions – entrepreneurs often help shape institutions themselves. The bilateral causal relation between entrepreneurs and institutions is examined in this paper. Entrepreneurs affect institutions in at least three ways. Entrepreneurship abiding by existing institutions is occasionally disruptive enough to challenge the foundations of prevailing institutions. Entrepreneurs sometimes have the opportunity to evade institutions, which tends to undermine the effectiveness of the institutions, or cause institutions to change for the better. Lastly, entrepreneurs can directly alter institutions through innovative political entrepreneurship. Like business entrepreneurship, innovative political activity may be productive or unproductive, depending on the incentives facing entrepreneurs.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , March 2011 , pp. 47 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © The JOIE Foundation 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, D. (1995), ‘Reward Structures and the Allocation of Talent’, European Economic Review, 39 (1): 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., and Robinson, J. A. (2005), ‘Institutions as the Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth’, in Aghion, P. and Durlauf, S. (eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 385–472.Google Scholar
Acs, Z. J. and Phillips, R. J. (2002), ‘Entrepreneurship and Philanthropy in American Capitalism’, Small Business Economics, 19 (3): 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aidis, R., Estrin, S., and Mickiewicz, T. (2008), ‘Institutions and Entrepreneurship Development in Russia: A Comparative Perspective’, Journal of Business Venturing, 23 (6): 656–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, K. J. (1962), ‘The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing’, Review of Economic Studies, 29 (3): 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Åslund, A., Bonne, P., and Johnson, S. (2002), ‘Escaping the Under-Reform Trap’, IMF Staff Papers, 48 (1): 88–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asoni, A. and Sanandaji, T. (2009), ‘Taxation and the Quality and Quantity of Entrepreneurship’, IFN Working Paper No. 813, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, Stockholm.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battilana, J. (2006), ‘Agency and Institutions: The Enabling Role of Individuals’ Social Position’, Organization, 13 (5): 653–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumol, W. J. (1990), ‘Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive’, Journal of Political Economy, 98 (5): 893–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumol, W. J. (2010), The Microtheory of Innovative Entrepreneurship, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Becker, G. S. and Murphy, K. M. (2000), Social Economics: Market Behavior in a Social Environment, Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bergh, A. and Erlingsson, G. Ó. (2009), ‘Liberalization without Retrenchment: Understanding the Consensus on Swedish Welfare State Reforms’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 32 (1): 71–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boettke, P. J. and Coyne, C. J. (2003), ‘Entrepreneurship and Development: Cause or Consequence?’, Advances in Austrian Economics, 6: 67–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boettke, P. J. and Coyne, C. J. (2009), ‘Context Matters: Institutions and Entrepreneurship’, Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 5 (3): 135–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boettke, P. J. and Leeson, P. T. (2009), ‘Two-Tiered Entrepreneurship and Economic Development’, International Review of Law and Economics, 29 (3): 252–259.Google Scholar
Boschini, A., Pettersson, J., and Roine, J. (2007), ‘Resource Curse or Not: A Question of Appropriability’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 109 (3): 593–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. (1980), ‘Rent Seeking and Profit Seeking’, in Buchanan, J. M. and Tollison, G. (eds.), Toward a Theory of the Rent-Seeking Society, College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press, pp. 3–15.Google Scholar
Calomiris, C. (2009a), ‘Financial Innovation, Regulation, and Reform’, Cato Journal, 29 (1): 65–91.Google Scholar
Calomiris, C. (2009b), ‘The Subprime Turmoil: What's Old, What's New, and What's Next’, Journal of Structured Finance, 15 (1): 6–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caplan, B. (2007), The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chong, A. and Calderón, C. (2000), ‘Causality and Feedback between Institutional Measures and Economic Growth’, Economics and Politics, 12 (1): 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coyne, C. J. and Leeson, P. T. (2004), ‘The Plight of Underdeveloped Countries’, Cato Journal, 24 (3): 235–249.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. (1961), Who Governs? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Daokui, Li D., Feng, J., and Jiang, H. (2006), ‘Institutional Entrepreneurs’, American Economic Review, 96 (2): 358–362.Google Scholar
Davis, S. J. and Henrekson, M. (1997), ‘Industrial Policy, Employer Size and Economic Performance in Sweden’, in Freeman, R. B., Topel, R., and Swedenborg, B. (eds.), The Welfare State in Transition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 353–397.Google Scholar
DiLorenzo, Thomas (1988), ‘Competition and Political Entrepreneurship’, Review of Austrian Economics, 2 (1): 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J. (1988), ‘Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory’, in Zucker, L. (ed.), Institutional Patterns and Organizations, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, pp. 3–22.Google Scholar
Djankov, S., Qian, Y., Roland, G., and Zhuravskaya, E. (2006), ‘Entrepreneurship in China and Russia Compared’, Journal of the European Economic Association, 4 (2/3): 352–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douhan, R. and Henrekson, M. (2010), ‘Entrepreneurship and Second-Best Institutions: Going Beyond Baumol's Typology’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 20 (4): 629–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenn, G. W., Liang, N., and Prowse, S. (1995), The Economics of the Private Equity Market, Washington, DC: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. B., Topel, R., and Swedenborg, B. (eds.) (1997), The Welfare State in Transition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaglio, C. M. and Katz, J. A. (2001), ‘The Psychological Basis of Opportunity Identification: Entrepreneurial Alertness’, Small Business Economics, 16 (2): 95–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilley, B. (2002), ‘Entrepreneurs and Politics in Rural China’, in Bonnell, V. E. and Gold, T. B. (eds.), The New Entrepreneurs of Europe and Asia, New York and London: M.E. Sharpe, pp. 66–82.Google Scholar
Glaeser, E. L. (2005), ‘Paternalism and Psychology’, NBER Working Paper No. 11789.Google Scholar
Gompers, P. A. and Lerner, J. (2004), The Venture Capital Cycle, 2nd edn, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Guriev, S. and Rachinsky, A. (2005), ‘The Role of Oligarchs in Russian Capitalism’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19 (1): 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurkan, C. (2005), ‘A Comparison of Veblen and Schumpeter on Technology’, STPS Working Paper No. 509.Google Scholar
Hall, R. E. and Jones, C. I. (1999), ‘Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output Per Worker Than Others?’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114 (1): 83–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heilmann, S. (2008), ‘From Local Experiments to National Policy: The Origins of China's Distinctive Policy Process’, China Journal, 59: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrekson, M. (2005), ‘Entrepreneurship – a Weak Link in the Welfare State?’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 14 (3): 437–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrekson, M. and Jakobsson, U. (2001), ‘Where Schumpeter was Nearly Right – the Swedish Model and Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 11 (3): 331–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrekson, M. and Sanandaji, T. (2010), ‘Entrepreneurship and the Theory of Taxation’, Small Business Economics, forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Högfeldt, P. (2005), ‘The History and Politics of Corporate Ownership in Sweden’, in Morck, R. K. (ed.), A History of Corporate Governance around the World: Family Business Groups to Professional Managers, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 517–590.Google Scholar
Holcombe, R. G. (2007), Entrepreneurship and Economic Progress, New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, H. and Powell, W. W. (2005), ‘Institutions and Entrepreneurship’, in Alvarez, S. A., Agarwal, R., and Sorenson, O. (eds.), Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research, Boston and Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 179–210.Google Scholar
Kalantaridis, C. and Labrianidis, L. (2004), ‘Rural Entrepreneurs in Russia and the Ukraine: Origins, Motivations, and Institutional Change’, Journal of Economic Issues, 38 (3): 659–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasper, W. and Streit, M. E. (1998), Institutional Economics, Cheltenham, UK, and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Kirzner, I. M. (1973), Competition and Entrepreneurship, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kirzner, I. M. (1992), The Meaning of the Market Process: Essays in the Development of Modern Austrian Economics, New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirzner, I. M. (2009), ‘The Alert and Creative Entrepreneur: A Clarification’, Small Business Economics, 32 (2): 145–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, F. H. (1921), Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. W. (1999), ‘The Quality of Government’, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 15 (1): 222–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, O. and Teets, J. (2009), ‘A China Model? Understanding the Evolution of a “Socialist Market Economy”’, Looking Glass Report, Glasshouse Forum, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Lindbeck, A. (1982), ‘Tax Effects versus Budget Effects on Labor Supply’, Economic Inquiry, 20 (3): 473–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindert, P. H. (2004), Growing Public: Volume 1, The Story: Social Spending and Economic Growth Since the Eighteenth Century, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lu, C. (1994), Entrepreneurship in Suppressed Markets: Private-Sector Experience in China, New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Lucas, R. E. (1988), ‘On the Mechanics of Economic Development’, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22 (1): 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddison, A. (1982), Phases of Capitalist Development, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McClelland, D. C. (1961), The Achieving Society, Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meredith, M. (2002), Mugabe: Power and Plunder in Zimbabwe, London: Perseus Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, K. M., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. W. (1991), ‘The Allocation of Talent: Implication for Growth’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106 (2): 503–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D. C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D. C. and Weingast, B. R. (1989), ‘Constitutions and Commitment: Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth Century England’, Journal of Economic History, 49 (4): 803–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, M. (1965), The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, S. C. (2009), The Economics of Entrepreneurship, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peebles, G. and Wilson, P. (2002), Economic Growth and Development in Singapore: Past and Future, Cheltenham, UK, and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, T. and Tabellini, G. (2004), ‘Constitutions and Economic Policy’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18 (1): 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, T. and Tabellini, G. (2006), ‘Electoral Systems and Economic Policy’, in Weingast, B. R. and Wittman, D. A. (eds.), Handbook of Political Economy, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 723–738.Google Scholar
Polsby, N. (1984), Political Innovation in America, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pontusson, J. (2005), Inequality and Prosperity: Social Europe versus Liberal America, Ithaka, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauch, A. and Frese, M. (2000), ‘Psychological Approaches to Entrepreneurial Success: A General Model and an Overview of Findings’, in Cooper, C. L. and Robertson, I. T. (eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New York: Wiley, pp. 101–142.Google Scholar
Rodrik, D. (2008), ‘Second-Best Institutions’, American Economic Review, 98 (2): 100–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., and Trebbi, F. (2004), ‘Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions over Geography and Integration in Economic Development’, Journal of Economic Growth, 9 (2): 131–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogerson, R. (2007), ‘Taxation and Market Work: Is Scandinavia an Outlier?’, Economic Theory, 32 (1): 59–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, P. M. (1986), ‘Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth’, Journal of Political Economy, 94 (5): 1002–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, M., Teske, P., and Minton, M. (1995), Public Entrepreneurs: Agents for Change in American Government, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, R. W. (1995), Institutions and Organizations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Scott, R. W. (2004), ‘Institutional Theory: Contributing to a Theoretical Research Programme’, in Smith, K. G. and Hitt, M. A. (eds.), Great Minds in Management: The Process of Theory Development, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 460–485.Google Scholar
Slinko, I., Yakovlev, E., and Zhuravskaya, E. (2005), ‘Law for Sale: Evidence from Russia’, American Law and Economics Review, 7 (1): 284–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobel, R. S. (2008), ‘Testing Baumol: Institutional Quality and the Productivity of Entrepreneurship’, Journal of Business Venturing, 23 (6): 641–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinmo, S. H. (2010), The Evolution of Modern States: Sweden, Japan and the United States, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strömberg, D. (2004), ‘Radio's Impact on Public Spending’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119 (1): 189–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swedberg, R. (2000), Entrepreneurship: The Social Science View, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsai, K. (2006) ‘Informal Adaptive Institutions and Endogenous Institutional Change in China’, World Politics, 59 (1): 116–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Steen, M. and Groenewegen, J. (2009), ‘Policy Entrepreneurship: Empirical Inquiry into Policy Agents and Institutional Structures’, Journal of Innovation Economics, 2 (4): 41–61.Google Scholar
Walker, D. (1977), ‘Thorstein Veblen's Economic System’, Economic Inquiry, 15 (2): 217–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R. E. (1966), ‘Pressure Groups and Political Entrepreneurs: A Review Essay’, Public Choice, 1 (1): 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, T. B. (2004), ‘Cognition, Creativity and Entrepreneurship’, Journal of Business Venturing, 19 (2): 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, M. (2001 [1905]), The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Yu, T. F. L. (2001), ‘An Entrepreneurial Perspective of Institutional Change’, Constitutional Political Economy, 12 (3): 217–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar